LETS GO NV 26-0
NV
SRG
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.46 1.54 1.30 | 313 356 228 | 20 14 6 | / 13 10 3 / | 5 5 0 | +7 +4 +3 | 83% 83% 83% | 178 209 117 | 25% 25% 25% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.40 1.37 1.45 | 290 315 242 | 20 15 5 | / 11 7 4 / | 3 1 2 | +9 +8 +1 | 83% 75% 100% | 187 197 167 | 40% 42% 30% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.31 1.53 0.88 | 210 227 177 | 13 10 3 | / 9 5 4 / | 7 2 5 | +4 +5 -1 | 78% 83% 67% | 149 161 126 | 28% 32% 17% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.30 1.17 1.56 | 237 203 305 | 16 9 7 | / 8 5 3 / | 4 2 2 | +8 +4 +4 | 83% 83% 83% | 160 140 201 | 37% 48% 24% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.85 0.27 2.02 | 146 78 283 | 10 4 6 | / 11 9 2 / | 5 1 4 | -1 -5 +4 | 67% 50% 100% | 99 61 177 | 56% 67% 50% | 3 0 3 | 4 4 0 | -1 -4 +3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.96 1.05 0.92 | 221 227 218 | 13 5 8 | / 16 5 11 / | 2 0 2 | -3 0 -3 | 67% 67% 67% | 151 149 152 | 24% 18% 26% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.85 0.50 1.03 | 201 162 221 | 14 4 10 | / 16 6 10 / | 3 0 3 | -2 -2 0 | 72% 67% 75% | 114 95 124 | 35% 67% 28% | 3 0 3 | 3 1 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.76 0.02 1.17 | 186 19 271 | 12 0 12 | / 16 6 10 / | 4 2 2 | -4 -6 +2 | 67% 67% 67% | 114 19 162 | 32% 0% 35% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.63 1.10 0.40 | 154 259 103 | 8 6 2 | / 16 5 11 / | 7 0 7 | -8 +1 -9 | 61% 50% 67% | 117 181 84 | 38% 60% 25% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.34 0.12 0.46 | 103 61 126 | 5 1 4 | / 15 5 10 / | 4 1 3 | -10 -4 -6 | 39% 33% 42% | 68 38 83 | 20% 0% 25% | 0 0 0 | 5 3 2 | -5 -3 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 1.86 1.68 | 311 317 303 | 41 19 22 | / 16 8 8 / | 6 1 5 | +25 +11 +14 | 88% 80% 94% | 182 206 162 | 27% 41% 19% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.74 0.87 1.27 | 218 276 169 | 24 15 9 | / 17 6 11 / | 15 5 10 | +7 +9 -2 | 79% 87% 72% | 154 192 122 | 33% 38% 27% | 5 1 4 | 1 0 1 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.17 1.27 1.22 | 218 211 226 | 27 12 15 | / 14 7 7 / | 6 4 2 | +13 +5 +8 | 82% 87% 78% | 143 144 142 | 32% 38% 28% | 2 2 0 | 3 2 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.46 1.82 1.20 | 276 93 408 | 31 6 25 | / 22 10 12 / | 12 3 9 | +9 -4 +13 | 76% 60% 89% | 179 64 275 | 39% 50% 37% | 7 0 7 | 6 4 2 | +1 -4 +5 | |
|
1.40 0.82 1.08 | 211 294 160 | 27 15 12 | / 21 11 10 / | 7 5 2 | +6 +4 +2 | 82% 87% 78% | 130 172 96 | 26% 27% 24% | 4 3 1 | 2 1 1 | +2 +2 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.55 1.09 0.80 | 177 134 234 | 21 8 13 | / 30 17 13 / | 8 4 4 | -9 -9 0 | 67% 61% 73% | 107 88 131 | 31% 42% 23% | 4 1 3 | 4 2 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.75 0.77 0.76 | 171 167 185 | 18 10 8 | / 30 16 14 / | 4 1 3 | -12 -6 -6 | 55% 50% 60% | 123 114 132 | 25% 20% 30% | 4 3 1 | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.55 0.94 0.71 | 178 139 229 | 19 7 12 | / 30 17 13 / | 6 4 2 | -11 -10 -1 | 55% 50% 60% | 114 92 142 | 28% 24% 32% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.72 0.49 0.62 | 169 194 126 | 18 12 6 | / 29 16 13 / | 4 1 3 | -11 -4 -7 | 48% 50% 47% | 101 122 76 | 39% 46% 30% | 0 0 0 | 7 5 2 | -7 -5 -2 | |
|
0.61 0.35 0.49 | 140 174 104 | 14 11 3 | / 31 17 14 / | 7 0 7 | -17 -6 -11 | 55% 44% 67% | 104 124 80 | 33% 37% 29% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
NV
SRG
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.02 1.85 2.06 | 332 327 334 | 21 4 17 | / 5 1 4 / | 3 0 3 | +16 +3 +13 | 93% 100% 92% | 176 242 160 | 20% 38% 17% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.62 1.25 1.72 | 406 152 471 | 21 2 19 | / 11 1 10 / | 7 2 5 | +10 +1 +9 | 87% 100% 83% | 275 79 324 | 34% 33% 34% | 4 0 4 | 2 0 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.21 2.57 0.87 | 225 469 165 | 11 5 6 | / 8 1 7 / | 8 3 5 | +3 +4 -1 | 80% 100% 75% | 159 317 120 | 41% 50% 33% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.13 1.16 1.12 | 198 243 187 | 11 3 8 | / 6 2 4 / | 2 2 0 | +5 +1 +4 | 80% 100% 75% | 122 160 113 | 26% 18% 30% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.64 0.84 0.58 | 109 45 125 | 7 1 6 | / 8 1 7 / | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | 80% 100% 75% | 73 25 85 | 26% 100% 23% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.95 1.02 0.64 | 234 261 126 | 13 11 2 | / 14 11 3 / | 0 0 0 | -1 0 -1 | 60% 58% 67% | 141 164 50 | 54% 55% 50% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.73 0.58 1.33 | 153 120 286 | 7 4 3 | / 14 11 3 / | 5 4 1 | -7 -7 0 | 60% 58% 67% | 99 84 160 | 27% 35% 10% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.64 0.82 0.02 | 170 198 61 | 7 7 0 | / 14 11 3 / | 2 2 0 | -7 -4 -3 | 40% 42% 33% | 114 128 61 | 25% 26% 20% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.52 0.61 0.19 | 120 137 54 | 5 5 0 | / 14 11 3 / | 2 1 1 | -9 -6 -3 | 40% 42% 33% | 89 97 54 | 27% 21% 50% | 2 2 0 | 3 2 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.32 0.37 0.14 | 126 131 111 | 6 5 1 | / 15 12 3 / | 0 0 0 | -9 -7 -2 | 47% 42% 67% | 89 95 64 | 27% 24% 40% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 |
What these guys did to flor is crazy man. Straight up backstabbers the second she got accused. Turned their back on her instantly. Turns out the accuser was batshit crazy.
Let me put it this way. She was their team mate, they knew her better than most. So them 'backstabbing' her is not 'backstabbing' its means whatever that came out has some truth, are We ignoring what sarah had posted? SRG knew what they were doing, and they did the Right thing
I donât think you know how betting works buddy. NV had a 1.02 which means they were the ones that got better on more. SRG had a higher return which means that they got betted on less.
yeah ive got no clue how betting works because ive never done one, but i thought higher odds was bad. But surely im right, you should bet on SRG since they were betted on less, so if they win, $100 would turn to $1100
ambrosia and m80/Chets pets blew up and didn't keep their slots - guess they were filled from the promo/relegation teams that didn't qquite make it
geeza went back to maryville
marved was just a sub i dont think he wants to play t2 lol
kyu went to cubert acad
sato/oke dipped to LEV
chet aint wasting his time coaching rebuilding and coaching a unpaid t2 team
Canezera lives for these moments quite literally
Part of the shanks mooda group for a reason
Btw how is SRG still getting shots after losing badly the splits before đ
Ambrosia and m80/chets pets disbanded so Iâm guessing the spots went to the promo/relegation teams
Bullied out by allowing stalkers to set the narrative is now called retiring? Ok, Mr. 1984.
bahahahahahahhahah
Eggster vs Girl pros lol.
Any na t2 team losing to SRG should disband..
radiant vs diamonds ahh matchup
envy 26-2, giving 1 honour round for every map
It would be nice for a GC team to become good enough for T1, but this year ain't it maybe 2026/2027
the current GC talent pool doesn't have 5 T1 worthy players, a few T2 stragglers but that's about it imo
if you made an international super team and they magically had good chemistry, I could see a gamechangers team get wins in tier 1. But it's unrealistic.
Nah, there's nobody mechanically in GC playing right now ready for tier 1. From what I know not a single GC player has reached top 3 on ladder outside of flor. First we need them to conquer that, then they need to play well in tier 2.
Incredibly unrealistic scenario but I think we will get another GC player in Tier 1 by having some turkish 15yo girl prodigy that stomps GC, stomps ladder and then gains T2 experience aged 16-18, and picked up by a team, but that would basically require her to be the next kaajak
I can't wait for the eggster "I dropped 50 on girl pros" video after NV 26-0 SRG
Genuinely curious, why is the T2 team, ENVY of all teams, allowed to play a GC team? We're gonna see back-to-back 13-0s lmao.
They didn't win open quals. They only got in because teams dropped out/left challengers all together.
cane is gonna drop 30 both maps gg ff how did girls even make it its not gonna be fair đ€Šââïž
not saying srg is going to win, but they aren't that bad, (as a envy supporter) ENVY 2-1 srg
And they will make our SAGE main Grimmy apologies for calling them Female Pros. Make me sick.
Youâre acting like ENVY didnât just do this to Maryville a month ago
SRG should be held to a higher standard than MU imo, the standards they impose upon themselves
By being a female team in valorant? Wdym?
No shade or anything I wanna understand from your pov
i get you
the players only seem to want to use GC as a means to reach t2/t1. they often say that winning GC is cool and all but the ultimate goal is to reach t2/t1, and thus not doing that is by them considered a failure. so if they can't fulfil their own expectations, it's easy for the viewers to have similar expectations too
So MU's goal wasn't to go to tier 2, and instead rot in tier 3? Also SRG's goal was to make it to tier 2. They didn't say anything about making it to tier 1
Ah ok I see where youâre coming from, although I think every teamâs âgoalâ is to make tier 1, not just SRG
i agree, and if those teams similarly think they're ready and agree to be held to the standards of tier 1 teams, then i think it's fair to do so. SR are org backed tho, probably get better scrims than other teams and prob have a lot more time to prac in general, so i think it's fair to hold them to a higher standard
Canezerra revealed he sat alone in his room, crying for what he was going to do to SRG the night before the match
canezzera, the greatest mechanical valorant player right now, is in tier 2 đ„
"nah guys the gap between gc and t2 isnt that big"