terrible take

8/8. Br0nzils are gonna fall for this so hard

you can still do these 2 (frag movies, VOD review) in the released version.

ok

sage's pick rate will go down to 0% then

@Jinxypoo

welcome to 100t

maybe

yeah its dogshit ngl

tsm already qualified, doesnt matter if they win or lose.
if qor win against tsm then they qualify but if qor lose then winthrop make it instead.

cya tmmr cutie

tbd 2-0 sen

prx clears

my goat

idk bout th, the chance they make it out of groups is prob over 50%

r we real. look at ur link

no bias like 5/10 with bias like 7/10 for me

congrats prx

classic TH vs china. TH win 2-1 (2 OTs)

drx how did u lose this one

bye bye brazil

prx fnc rematch

NRG 3-2 PRX

DRG 2-0 G2

NRG 2-1 TL

FNC 2-1 BLG

PRX 2-1 SEN

bc of roles

no

bro what

meteor, alfa and maybe nats

If lev win next map we'll see 10 posts about how great Sato is and that lev should be grateful for him. all these rage bait posts are getting too repetitive that they are no longer funny 🥀

bro u gotta be diamond max

0/8 how r people fallin for this

yeah but 1 game doesnt define a teams skill. mibr probably would have played better against g2 but its just a shit game from 100t. teams are bound to have terrible games every now and then but using their bad game to define their current skill level is ridiculous unless they have been playing terribly consistently

0/8

dropping zikz will not fix all our problems. the agent pool isnt even the biggest issue

i mean bro they were shit in the sean gares season like even worse than rn

its bc he is fun to watch so people just glaze him even tho he aint good

urango aint good

1st seed is only bad for masters but it doesnt rlly matter for champs

i just didnt find t1 vs g2 enjoyable mainly bc it felt so flukey with the new tejo meta and teams not really knowing how to play properly. Just felt like the quality of val wasn't as high as the other grand finals in the past which affects the enjoyability of the tournament for me

kaajak zekken t3xture.

prob kaajak first

buddy i dont need random ahh advice from you, it just sounds privlidged and yeah I didnt realise it was the same person so my mistake there but my point still stands since #9 isnt wrong and so why would n1lf give a negative reply in #11 if he didnt disagree?

r u basing ur info off that stage 1 tiebracker?? bc there is another method that would end with the same result and its by doing it one by one and so in the 4 way tie bracker there is no clear winner for h2h so it goes to maps, rrq then win first seed from maps. then its a 3 way tiebracker by talon make 2nd seed bc they have clear h2h advantage and then final 2 h2h and t1 has that advantage.

this method is prob wrong but im just wondering if yk this for a fact or ur just basing it off stage 1 pacific

the latter is easily the more likely event

yeah but my point is that its possible for 100t to lose and yet still make first seed which u said was impossible in ur original post

yeah when i was thinking about it I wasnt sure if they would do it in rounds where its a subgroup h2h so u seperate teams based on how many h2hs they have won in the tiebracker or if they just sort the tiebracker with the entire context in mind

holy shit no way u are this dumb. the diff is +9 so 100t just can't go down more than 4. so if the scoreline is 13-5, 12-14, 9-13. and 100t loses then 100t have won a total of +2 rounds leaving them with +23 rounds and so they are above lev in rounds and tied on maps. and so in a 4 way tie where 100t loses to lev and nrg loses to kru then 100t would be first even tho they lost to lev.

r u restarted?? 100t are +21 and +3 on maps whereas lev are +12 and +1 on maps so if they win 1 map then they are tied on maps and so they just gotta make sure they dont lose many rounds

also 3 way tie is impossible, it would be a 4 way tie