Who cars?
TGRD
OPTC
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 0.45 2.04 | 227 114 398 | 18 5 13 | / 15 10 5 / | 0 0 0 | +3 -5 +8 | 75% 58% 100% | 132 70 225 | 28% 33% 27% | 5 2 3 | 4 4 0 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.87 0.74 1.06 | 215 159 300 | 15 6 9 | / 16 10 6 / | 1 1 0 | -1 -4 +3 | 80% 75% 88% | 128 95 178 | 36% 33% 38% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.86 0.52 1.37 | 161 117 226 | 11 5 6 | / 15 11 4 / | 5 1 4 | -4 -6 +2 | 65% 50% 88% | 137 113 174 | 31% 47% 19% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.82 0.89 0.71 | 172 207 120 | 12 8 4 | / 16 11 5 / | 4 4 0 | -4 -3 -1 | 75% 67% 88% | 108 129 78 | 29% 33% 20% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.80 0.93 0.60 | 144 184 85 | 9 8 1 | / 14 10 4 / | 7 2 5 | -5 -2 -3 | 60% 58% 63% | 102 128 64 | 23% 28% 13% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.49 0.68 2.03 | 304 196 376 | 23 5 18 | / 12 7 5 / | 2 1 1 | +11 -2 +13 | 80% 75% 83% | 193 141 227 | 38% 15% 52% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.36 1.64 1.17 | 225 282 188 | 17 8 9 | / 11 5 6 / | 7 2 5 | +6 +3 +3 | 75% 75% 75% | 147 171 131 | 30% 26% 33% | 2 2 0 | 2 0 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
0.98 0.05 1.60 | 206 50 311 | 12 0 12 | / 14 8 6 / | 9 4 5 | -2 -8 +6 | 65% 50% 75% | 151 43 222 | 29% 17% 31% | 2 0 2 | 4 3 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.94 1.21 0.76 | 184 253 139 | 13 8 5 | / 12 6 6 / | 5 0 5 | +1 +2 -1 | 70% 50% 83% | 127 176 94 | 22% 16% 36% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.76 0.59 0.87 | 163 105 202 | 11 3 8 | / 16 7 9 / | 6 3 3 | -5 -4 -1 | 65% 63% 67% | 104 67 129 | 26% 29% 25% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 1.83 1.46 | 282 243 337 | 68 32 36 | / 39 26 13 / | 7 2 5 | +29 +6 +23 | 78% 69% 89% | 173 149 203 | 32% 32% 31% | 15 7 8 | 10 9 1 | +5 -2 +7 | |
|
0.88 1.23 1.03 | 209 178 249 | 49 22 27 | / 43 27 16 / | 5 5 0 | +6 -5 +11 | 73% 64% 86% | 132 118 150 | 34% 36% 31% | 7 1 6 | 5 4 1 | +2 -3 +5 | |
|
0.57 1.31 0.90 | 165 120 221 | 39 15 24 | / 44 29 15 / | 13 3 10 | -5 -14 +9 | 67% 50% 89% | 115 87 151 | 29% 33% 26% | 5 1 4 | 6 6 0 | -1 -5 +4 | |
|
0.85 0.97 0.90 | 167 172 162 | 36 20 16 | / 46 29 17 / | 31 18 13 | -10 -9 -1 | 78% 69% 89% | 101 97 107 | 23% 25% 21% | 3 2 1 | 4 3 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.73 0.91 0.81 | 162 165 160 | 35 20 15 | / 45 32 13 / | 17 8 9 | -10 -12 +2 | 72% 69% 75% | 111 110 111 | 25% 25% 25% | 4 2 2 | 5 1 4 | -1 +1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.82 1.33 1.10 | 237 185 272 | 52 16 36 | / 45 23 22 / | 7 4 3 | +7 -7 +14 | 77% 71% 81% | 147 124 165 | 27% 11% 38% | 9 4 5 | 6 5 1 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
1.01 1.18 1.10 | 203 188 221 | 46 18 28 | / 43 21 22 / | 23 10 13 | +3 -3 +6 | 73% 68% 78% | 129 116 138 | 27% 30% 25% | 5 2 3 | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.83 1.12 0.99 | 200 172 228 | 44 17 27 | / 46 23 23 / | 19 6 13 | -2 -6 +4 | 67% 61% 72% | 130 107 147 | 22% 20% 24% | 9 0 9 | 3 1 2 | +6 -1 +7 | |
|
0.22 1.48 0.93 | 207 101 294 | 44 7 37 | / 46 27 19 / | 14 7 7 | -2 -20 +18 | 64% 50% 75% | 143 72 198 | 28% 19% 31% | 5 1 4 | 15 10 5 | -10 -9 -1 | |
|
0.66 0.61 0.63 | 138 160 119 | 31 17 14 | / 47 24 23 / | 14 3 11 | -16 -7 -9 | 66% 50% 78% | 93 101 87 | 30% 25% 38% | 2 0 2 | 6 3 3 | -4 -3 -1 |
TGRD
OPTC
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.91 1.86 1.98 | 318 313 329 | 23 13 10 | / 8 6 2 / | 3 2 1 | +15 +7 +8 | 80% 75% 88% | 216 212 222 | 41% 34% 59% | 6 3 3 | 2 1 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.21 1.23 1.17 | 208 188 240 | 16 9 7 | / 10 6 4 / | 2 2 0 | +6 +3 +3 | 80% 75% 88% | 138 136 141 | 36% 44% 20% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.08 0.86 1.41 | 185 177 198 | 15 8 7 | / 11 8 3 / | 2 1 1 | +4 0 +4 | 70% 58% 88% | 110 101 123 | 42% 33% 58% | 2 0 2 | 4 4 0 | -2 -4 +2 | |
|
1.03 0.98 1.09 | 162 174 145 | 11 7 4 | / 12 8 4 / | 16 8 8 | -1 -1 0 | 85% 75% 100% | 86 87 84 | 15% 9% 27% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.75 0.40 1.26 | 172 105 273 | 12 4 8 | / 15 12 3 / | 5 4 1 | -3 -8 +5 | 90% 83% 100% | 110 65 178 | 26% 21% 29% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.03 0.89 1.12 | 217 218 217 | 15 6 9 | / 16 8 8 / | 1 0 1 | -1 -2 +1 | 70% 50% 83% | 137 143 132 | 27% 15% 35% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.92 0.97 0.88 | 192 191 193 | 12 5 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 10 3 7 | -2 -1 -1 | 65% 63% 67% | 112 100 120 | 15% 17% 14% | 4 0 4 | 2 0 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.76 0.50 0.94 | 144 92 180 | 9 2 7 | / 15 7 8 / | 8 3 5 | -6 -5 -1 | 70% 63% 75% | 79 56 94 | 28% 38% 24% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.69 0.07 1.09 | 168 61 241 | 11 1 10 | / 15 7 8 / | 3 1 2 | -4 -6 +2 | 55% 38% 67% | 114 48 158 | 35% 29% 37% | 1 0 1 | 5 3 2 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.43 0.21 0.58 | 122 109 132 | 9 3 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 1 2 | -8 -5 -3 | 60% 38% 75% | 82 56 99 | 56% 75% 50% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
TGRD
OPTC
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 1.18 1.60 | 302 302 302 | 27 14 13 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 0 4 | +11 +4 +7 | 79% 75% 83% | 170 165 176 | 23% 28% 19% | 4 2 2 | 4 4 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.03 0.68 1.38 | 203 185 221 | 18 7 11 | / 17 11 6 / | 2 2 0 | +1 -4 +5 | 63% 42% 83% | 130 122 138 | 30% 30% 29% | 3 0 3 | 2 2 0 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.87 0.85 0.89 | 169 204 136 | 14 8 6 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 2 3 | -2 -2 0 | 67% 67% 67% | 118 138 99 | 25% 23% 28% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.87 0.68 1.06 | 167 135 200 | 13 5 8 | / 18 10 8 / | 11 6 5 | -5 -5 0 | 75% 67% 83% | 108 76 141 | 25% 40% 19% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.33 1.22 | 149 66 232 | 13 2 11 | / 18 10 8 / | 6 1 5 | -5 -8 +3 | 67% 42% 92% | 100 46 154 | 19% 17% 20% | 3 1 2 | 2 2 0 | +1 -1 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.25 0.89 1.60 | 246 205 288 | 21 9 12 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 0 3 | +5 -1 +6 | 71% 58% 83% | 166 138 193 | 26% 20% 31% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.18 0.93 1.42 | 241 190 294 | 20 8 12 | / 17 9 8 / | 8 5 3 | +3 -1 +4 | 75% 67% 83% | 155 120 190 | 25% 30% 21% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.09 0.44 1.73 | 246 163 330 | 21 6 15 | / 17 12 5 / | 2 2 0 | +4 -6 +10 | 71% 58% 83% | 160 107 213 | 23% 17% 27% | 2 1 1 | 6 4 2 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.86 0.83 | 189 156 223 | 14 5 9 | / 17 8 9 / | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 | 79% 83% 75% | 118 100 135 | 12% 0% 21% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.55 0.59 0.50 | 108 131 85 | 9 6 3 | / 18 10 8 / | 6 2 4 | -9 -4 -5 | 67% 58% 75% | 74 80 67 | 27% 26% 27% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 |
what riot, why are there the opportunity for 2 teams from the same region to already face each other in the first playoffs match?
yeah, its stupid, if optic make it then its guaranteed that one of NA goes to lowers in round 1, which is stupid, it shouldn't be seeded like that.
But it also means that one of the NA teams are at least guaranteed to get to the Upper Semifinals.
:\
There's no way to balance the bracket where it was guaranteed to avoid any intraregional matches in round one. It could have happened to NA or EU, and if you swapped the seeding around to avoid it, it would have made it possible in BR and APAC.
Its not stupid its perfect for NA regions...if you still cant figure why....you are the real stupid
Hello fracra, when is Xerxia playing? I don't see them in the bracket, can you please tell me. Thank you
Xerxia is already eliminated. They didn't advance to playoffs along with KRU, Fnatic and NIP.
XERXIA/OPTIC 2 x 0 GUARD
Why? The Guard will have a slow start. XERXIA and OPTIC are both incredible teams, both can win against GUARD here, but I'm certain that even if they lose they can come back in lowers though.
agree, TGRD is a team with an amazing potential but is their first international event so they could feel nervous in the first match
Optic is yay and friends, I dont know how fns is in an international competition, he seems to be playing on silver
GUARD 2 - 1 OPTIC
LOUD 1 - 2 LIQUID
DRX 2 - 0 PRX
G2 2 - 0 ZETA
calling it rn
man...
one of the NA teams is guaranteed to go to lowers after the first round. assuming optic even makes it.
i hope Optic looses against xerxia because i don't wan't to see an NA vs NA match
Optic look absolutely terrible right now - sloppy game for XIA, whatever the controversy might be - also a super messy bind against KRU & a much better ascent, but KRU did not look anywhere near what they did at previous events.
XIA likely win that rematch today, and either way, Guard should be beating either.
LAN debut however, might be rough.
Guard 2-1 XIA
XERXIA 2-1 TGRD
XERXIA is NA"s kryptonite
EMEA Teams is XERXIA's kryptonite
however tf w this match…
if xia win optc yeah its APAC v NA again?
and if optc win xia is NA rematch again?
rito messed up their master’s brackets again.
Whoever is against guard should win
I hate the guard for what they did to my team and I bet 200% that the guard won’t win this masters.
Kinda sucks for The Guard that they come to an international tournament and their first match up is against OpTic. I wanna see this team against international competition, not a fucking regional match up.
Guard 2-1 Optic
this seeding putting two NA teams against each other first round of playoffs is crazy boring tho, even if it’s a rematch
man OPTC/XER should have been seeded to G2 and NIP/ZETA to here. Why the 2 na teams playing first round?
Optic has LAN experience from before, also pretty sure they weren't aware that the qualifier finals would have given them a by. Still feel like it will be a very close match up.
OG 2-1 TGRD
they don't want to see us succeed
braindead format
braindead scheduling
go fuck yourself riot
anytime 2+ teams from NA make it to playoffs they always face each other. so dumb.
it's happens to emea in multiple times, smb and acend paired 3 time in just a series... rito sucks
for sure this will go for Optic. Guard won't make it in their first LAN game.
Optic 2-0 or maybe 2-1. Optic is looking warmed up compared to Guard who have yet to play a map on lan but only time will tell
The only thing that i'm worried about is the lack of LAN experience from The Guard, besides that, i think they can go really far this tournament
BANGER!! i think Optic will be more prepared this time but could go either way. Deserves another Map 3 !
2-1 optic, guard have a free win on icebox tho so wouldnt be surprised if they win
NA is so lucky with the brackets again…
they got a guaranteed spot in the semis
Guard 2-1 Optic
Guard will change all their comps and Optic will struggle to adapt
Could go either way. I definitely favor Optic from a betting perspective though. They have better odds and I still think they are the better team despite losing that last bo5
Crashies actually a picie of shit for not killing the last guy. Like wtf, Yay gave you 1 sec advantage.
OG against The Guard in matches that matter versus seeding matches. Looks like upper bracket final optic is back.
I knew OpTic gonna win this 100%
They have already have beaten TGRD with a 2-0 and lost a close match with a 2-3, let's just call that last map a fluke.
DRX also lost their map pick and did a reverse sweep. Guard can pull this off. No way they choke on playoffs
They have been running this all year, it's what got them here in the first place
mce is talking to his team the whole tact timeout while chet is like (-_-)
lol Optic got 50% win rate on Fracture while Guard is 100%. Too free for Sayaplayer
yikes Optic needs to grind aimlab more. The number of times they lost a rifle vs pistol duel is crazy
EVERY GAME THAT GUARD PLAYS AND HE POPS OFF I GET REMINDED THAT T1 MADE SAYA CHANGE HIS NAME TO SPYDER AND THEN JUST DROPPED HIM OMEGA-FUCKING-LUL
I am an Optic fan but don't hate The Guard. They put up a really good fight. Good luck on The Guard in the lower brackets and Optic in the upper.
GGs OpTic, what a last map from FNS. GL to Guard in the lower bracket though.
Saya's timing is so unlucky man.. He scope, no enemy.. Unscopes then enemy appears.. Smh..
Optic's Icebox comp is my favorite right now. The Sova Recon and KO Knife make it really difficult to out-rotate them, especially in conjunction with the Sage Wall they use on Defense. Team's really need to prioritize breaking that wall early to deny info, and not having the whole team stacked there to be tagger by the recon / knife when they finally do. It's so readable and just puts Yay in these beautifully advantaged positions from which to absolutely dominate.
I don't like the Optic's Fracture comp at all though. I feel like the Zeta Division comp would just farm Victor. I think Raze is really strong on Fracture, and after watching Xeria (against Optic) and Kru (against Liquid) completely fail to shut down the Neons without Raze, I'm just even more convinced that Raze is a must-pick if you can't run the Neon yourself.
I really hope we get OPTC vs TL on Fracture, which might happen if TL beat Zeta and OPTC lose to DRX. Fingers crossed!!
Lol well the Zeta Division comp beat the Neon comp on Fracture so at least I was right about that part lol
sayaplayer +29 and lose feels bad man
also one of the best matches so far in this Masters. NA is always fun to watch
Trent so sucks on LAN. Maybe because he scares to aimboting here. 0 crazy-ass smoke headshot.
Saya is the real deal! Epic lower bracket run by the guard, epic upper bracket run by optic.. NA is back
I gotta a feeling there will be a rematch in the lower bracket and it's gonna be 2-0 for The Guard.