BBL 3-0 EZ
Phoenix, Yoru and KAY/O utility changes
M3C
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.73 0.91 | 282 347 197 | 20 14 6 | / 13 6 7 / | 5 2 3 | +7 +8 -1 | 81% 75% 89% | 187 234 125 | 17% 22% 8% | 6 4 2 | 4 2 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.37 0.82 2.11 | 273 149 438 | 20 6 14 | / 11 6 5 / | 7 3 4 | +9 0 +9 | 81% 83% 78% | 166 93 264 | 40% 38% 41% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.29 1.40 1.13 | 190 198 181 | 15 9 6 | / 10 5 5 / | 1 0 1 | +5 +4 +1 | 71% 67% 78% | 126 143 104 | 38% 38% 36% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.00 0.80 1.28 | 200 158 256 | 15 6 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 6 1 | +1 -2 +3 | 71% 67% 78% | 128 98 169 | 42% 33% 50% | 2 1 1 | 3 3 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.80 0.99 0.55 | 113 136 83 | 8 6 2 | / 10 5 5 / | 6 2 4 | -2 +1 -3 | 71% 75% 67% | 73 87 55 | 16% 12% 25% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 1.33 1.05 | 226 255 205 | 17 9 8 | / 16 6 10 / | 1 0 1 | +1 +3 -2 | 52% 56% 50% | 135 146 128 | 26% 29% 23% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.13 1.12 1.14 | 217 213 221 | 16 7 9 | / 14 7 7 / | 5 3 2 | +2 0 +2 | 71% 78% 67% | 127 136 121 | 38% 46% 34% | 3 0 3 | 3 1 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.69 0.83 0.58 | 147 220 93 | 11 7 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 3 3 0 | -4 -2 -2 | 71% 67% 75% | 91 147 49 | 28% 29% 25% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.38 0.53 0.26 | 78 131 40 | 6 4 2 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 1 2 | -11 -4 -7 | 52% 67% 42% | 46 84 17 | 42% 44% 33% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.35 0.02 0.65 | 112 43 165 | 8 1 7 | / 16 9 7 / | 0 0 0 | -8 -8 0 | 52% 44% 58% | 75 30 110 | 37% 14% 50% | 1 1 0 | 7 5 2 | -6 -4 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 1.53 1.29 | 248 224 284 | 75 39 36 | / 55 32 23 / | 32 14 18 | +20 +7 +13 | 79% 77% 81% | 161 140 188 | 34% 39% 29% | 5 5 0 | 7 5 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.05 0.90 0.99 | 208 220 192 | 62 36 26 | / 64 35 29 / | 13 6 7 | -2 +1 -3 | 71% 67% 76% | 135 148 117 | 24% 25% 20% | 20 11 9 | 17 7 10 | +3 +4 -1 | |
|
1.11 0.78 0.96 | 191 209 175 | 54 34 20 | / 60 32 28 / | 34 18 16 | -6 +2 -8 | 72% 71% 73% | 132 142 120 | 31% 34% 28% | 4 1 3 | 8 3 5 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.96 0.87 0.92 | 179 182 180 | 41 25 16 | / 42 23 19 / | 13 9 4 | -1 +2 -3 | 72% 72% 71% | 117 120 112 | 36% 38% 34% | 3 1 2 | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.72 0.82 0.76 | 180 174 190 | 51 27 24 | / 70 39 31 / | 20 13 7 | -19 -12 -7 | 69% 69% 70% | 120 111 132 | 37% 45% 31% | 4 2 2 | 8 6 2 | -4 -4 0 | |
|
0.40 1.05 0.68 | 151 106 213 | 11 4 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 2 1 | -5 -6 +1 | 62% 42% 89% | 93 69 124 | 28% 33% 23% | 1 0 1 | 4 4 0 | -3 -4 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.37 1.39 | 303 330 283 | 91 44 47 | / 60 30 30 / | 12 5 7 | +31 +14 +17 | 80% 81% 79% | 199 210 191 | 45% 50% 40% | 20 8 12 | 13 7 6 | +7 +1 +6 | |
|
1.37 1.24 1.30 | 267 283 256 | 80 38 42 | / 58 24 34 / | 13 3 10 | +22 +14 +8 | 68% 73% 65% | 170 171 169 | 25% 26% 24% | 18 10 8 | 9 3 6 | +9 +7 +2 | |
|
0.83 0.79 0.81 | 148 152 144 | 48 21 27 | / 56 25 31 / | 14 6 8 | -8 -4 -4 | 68% 76% 63% | 99 112 88 | 34% 29% 39% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.86 0.79 | 151 118 174 | 46 15 31 | / 59 26 33 / | 28 16 12 | -13 -11 -2 | 73% 76% 71% | 102 77 121 | 36% 40% 35% | 5 1 4 | 8 3 5 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.72 0.70 | 144 147 142 | 42 20 22 | / 62 30 32 / | 22 12 10 | -20 -10 -10 | 75% 81% 71% | 97 102 93 | 32% 33% 31% | 3 1 2 | 3 3 0 | 0 -2 +2 |
M3C
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.50 1.36 | 267 285 250 | 23 12 11 | / 16 9 7 / | 13 5 8 | +7 +3 +4 | 96% 92% 100% | 163 165 162 | 24% 31% 17% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.20 1.33 1.06 | 248 270 227 | 20 12 8 | / 16 8 8 / | 13 6 7 | +4 +4 0 | 88% 92% 83% | 173 185 161 | 38% 36% 39% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.86 0.69 1.03 | 190 158 223 | 16 9 7 | / 16 8 8 / | 9 6 3 | 0 +1 -1 | 71% 75% 67% | 117 90 144 | 31% 33% 30% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.80 0.46 1.15 | 193 167 221 | 16 6 10 | / 20 12 8 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -6 +2 | 83% 75% 92% | 121 117 126 | 18% 18% 19% | 6 2 4 | 5 4 1 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.74 0.85 0.63 | 182 190 175 | 15 8 7 | / 20 10 10 / | 3 2 1 | -5 -2 -3 | 75% 75% 75% | 132 132 132 | 31% 44% 23% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 1.85 1.19 | 357 411 304 | 28 18 10 | / 20 9 11 / | 7 3 4 | +8 +9 -1 | 79% 83% 75% | 245 278 212 | 33% 47% 22% | 7 2 5 | 3 1 2 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.29 1.35 1.22 | 269 281 257 | 22 11 11 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 3 2 | +4 +2 +2 | 67% 67% 67% | 186 186 186 | 26% 29% 23% | 5 3 2 | 3 2 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.94 0.50 1.39 | 179 112 246 | 17 5 12 | / 16 9 7 / | 1 0 1 | +1 -4 +5 | 71% 67% 75% | 113 73 152 | 35% 21% 45% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.64 0.80 0.48 | 118 155 81 | 10 7 3 | / 17 9 8 / | 7 3 4 | -7 -2 -5 | 71% 83% 58% | 94 123 65 | 27% 37% 17% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.51 0.27 0.74 | 122 54 191 | 11 2 9 | / 20 10 10 / | 7 4 3 | -9 -8 -1 | 63% 67% 58% | 80 35 125 | 28% 29% 27% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 |
M3C
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 0.85 1.90 | 234 165 354 | 15 7 8 | / 14 9 5 / | 10 5 5 | +1 -2 +3 | 68% 58% 86% | 159 112 241 | 30% 26% 35% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
1.01 1.20 0.70 | 204 234 153 | 14 10 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 1 0 1 | -1 +1 -2 | 53% 58% 43% | 120 135 94 | 32% 33% 29% | 6 4 2 | 4 1 3 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
0.75 0.79 0.69 | 173 164 189 | 9 5 4 | / 16 9 7 / | 7 3 4 | -7 -4 -3 | 68% 50% 100% | 128 123 136 | 24% 40% 12% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.61 0.80 0.27 | 157 188 105 | 10 7 3 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 3 0 | -6 -3 -3 | 74% 75% 71% | 106 128 67 | 44% 43% 50% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.48 0.47 0.51 | 131 139 119 | 7 5 2 | / 18 11 7 / | 6 2 4 | -11 -6 -5 | 53% 58% 43% | 90 83 102 | 20% 28% 14% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.78 2.02 1.64 | 368 472 308 | 26 12 14 | / 11 5 6 / | 4 1 3 | +15 +7 +8 | 95% 100% 92% | 230 276 203 | 50% 70% 38% | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
1.32 1.74 1.08 | 211 285 168 | 16 8 8 | / 9 3 6 / | 6 2 4 | +7 +5 +2 | 84% 100% 75% | 146 218 104 | 31% 28% 35% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.19 1.16 1.21 | 180 134 207 | 13 3 10 | / 10 3 7 / | 12 6 6 | +3 0 +3 | 89% 71% 100% | 135 87 163 | 41% 33% 43% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.01 0.93 1.05 | 235 230 238 | 15 6 9 | / 13 5 8 / | 6 0 6 | +2 +1 +1 | 74% 71% 75% | 146 137 151 | 25% 31% 19% | 3 1 2 | 5 1 4 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.82 0.52 1.00 | 136 81 168 | 9 2 7 | / 12 5 7 / | 7 5 2 | -3 -3 0 | 79% 86% 75% | 75 42 95 | 41% 40% 41% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
M3C
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.10 1.26 0.89 | 219 295 119 | 17 14 3 | / 14 8 6 / | 2 1 1 | +3 +6 -3 | 67% 75% 56% | 153 189 106 | 55% 68% 33% | 3 3 0 | 2 2 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.06 1.33 0.69 | 230 264 186 | 17 11 6 | / 18 10 8 / | 8 7 1 | -1 +1 -2 | 57% 67% 44% | 148 173 116 | 38% 41% 33% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.80 0.76 0.85 | 205 210 199 | 14 8 6 | / 18 10 8 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -2 -2 | 76% 75% 78% | 127 132 120 | 68% 85% 50% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.79 0.84 0.71 | 152 132 181 | 12 6 6 | / 16 8 8 / | 3 1 2 | -4 -2 -2 | 62% 58% 67% | 111 108 114 | 47% 42% 57% | 2 1 1 | 4 0 4 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.68 0.40 1.05 | 151 106 213 | 11 4 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 2 1 | -5 -6 +1 | 62% 42% 89% | 93 69 124 | 28% 33% 23% | 1 0 1 | 4 4 0 | -3 -4 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.92 1.81 2.00 | 374 398 356 | 29 13 16 | / 13 7 6 / | 1 1 0 | +16 +6 +10 | 95% 100% 92% | 243 248 239 | 59% 48% 73% | 7 3 4 | 3 1 2 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.70 1.78 1.65 | 338 355 325 | 26 12 14 | / 11 4 7 / | 1 0 1 | +15 +8 +7 | 81% 100% 67% | 208 205 211 | 22% 13% 29% | 6 4 2 | 0 0 0 | +6 +4 +2 | |
|
0.69 0.53 0.81 | 176 115 224 | 12 4 8 | / 18 7 11 / | 5 1 4 | -6 -3 -3 | 81% 89% 75% | 125 74 163 | 39% 38% 39% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.62 0.87 0.43 | 122 122 123 | 9 4 5 | / 14 5 9 / | 4 3 1 | -5 -1 -4 | 67% 78% 58% | 93 109 81 | 33% 29% 38% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.39 0.47 0.33 | 85 95 79 | 6 3 3 | / 15 6 9 / | 4 3 1 | -9 -3 -6 | 71% 89% 58% | 72 68 76 | 38% 50% 29% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
They benched Paura for Cyder. It's like benching TenZ for a player from girl kissers. No way BBL wins
The teams here will be either:
Guild (75% chance)
M3C (75%)
Acend (50%)
Liquid (40% or 75% if they get IGL)
the rest so bad
TL won last year's LCQ because tbf there were not ANY good teams playing LCQ it was just TL, G2 and Guild. This time it has M3C 'and' Acend. Gonna be way close than last years. But I still think TL vs Ace in the finals since M3C are still orgless and having an org is like a big role in pro play
M3C 3 - 1 GUILD
They were unlucky, they deserve to reach the final and win.
that is the worst logic ive ever seen. why dont everyone not play the game then because everyone whos not pro are worse, so why even play? were bad so it doesnt even matter
G2 3-1 M3C
G2 is looking amazing individually, and M3C are quite strong as well. Anyway I found the russian team very irregular.
M3C could pop off in some maps but that won't be enough
G2 3-1 M3C/TL
TL and M3C could win as well, but if g2 maintains the same level than vs NAVI then no way he loses.
I mean theres no way M3c lose esp with map bans?? They ban split and haven maybe they lose bind but thats it. G2 doesnt have the best map pool
m3c up 2-0, map 3 goes to 50 rounds, nAts drops 60 frags in 3rd map, m3c champions revenge arc continues
bro i predicted a M3C vs TL final except I had TL beating M3C and M3C winning lowerfinals
what's the possibility of m3c got signed if they qual to champs if it high then I root for m3c if not then #LetsGoLiquid
INSHALLAH M3C WIN LCQ, WIN CHAMPS AND GET ALL 5 SIGNED BY ORG NEXT YEAR INSHALLAH
i wrote the script
https://www.vlr.gg/126199/emea-lcq-prediction
thank me later
im worry about m3c. they might have vetoes advantage, but jady need to turn on a little bit. if dimasick keep diff him as a new player, TL might take this series.
because nAts might not having such a good day again...
i believe this goes to 5th map. whoever wins, EMEA should be happy.
It's actually quite fair. You didn't get to play 1 extra hard eliminator on the same day. What do you want a free win?
why is this retard chronicle peeking during post plant when they will have to come towards your OP when they have to kill you or try to defuse? easily could've gotten 2 kills if he didnt peek, and they didnt even tap it.
someone please explain how this dogshit liquid team made it to finals, holy shit they are fucking terrible. Literally plat NA lobbies aim better than these dogs
how this guy "Nivera" is a pro player is beyond me. Its like they found a random french retard off the street selling sandwiches and had him join the team
m3c and their milliseconds
i already predict that this moment will be a turning point in this series
sadly
Russian mental collapse from .15 second defuse. 13-0 Liquid then 3-1 Liquid
After M3C experience bitter moments, like that throw on Icebox round 23, they start to crumble
Same was in M3C-Fnatic Stage 1
yup looking like a gg for m3c for the whole series imo. unless nAts gets 3k or 4k, they're not winning rounds
unvelivable....
seriously, i cant anymore
TL on champions would be a disaster
With new coach they look better than before, but yeah they mostly rely on individual pop offs, if Scream or Jamppii don't hit it's done
out of curiosity does anyone know why didn't m3c get a map ban advantage since they won the upper bracket ?
Different ruling, or they just make up rules as the tournament progresses, wouldn't be surprised, Freaks4U is dogshit
Liquid had to play 2 matches yesterday while M3C had a nice rest. Enough advantage
Why are you saying it meant nothing?
That win is what gave them more time to prepare and rest for today's game. And it also forced Liquid to play two games yesterday. It's quite simple.
2+2=4
Ok let's be real, this is the grand finals which decides if m3c will get into biggest vct of the year and they bet it on this random guy called purple purp0 . Wtf is wrong with em?
one of the easiest bets on liquid m4 :) if you cant see that happening after m3 you are clueless
fuck off... scream never did 300 acs in a bo5 or even bo3 on all maps combined, but yes in the most important game to qualify against god nats he carrys that dead team to LAN..
COPE HARDER BOZO
Stats say you're full of shit
https://www.vlr.gg/6869/team-liquid-vs-team-heretics-first-strike-europe-main-event-qf
if you just count kills, a duelist opens site, i think he did a good job.
he just lose to scream, he did good. Seems like u r the one who never trying duelist in competitive high rank diamond++
Jampii showing why you should never overpeek. He will hold one angle with awp for literally the entire round scoped in and allow liquid man advantage
HOLY, Now the champions will be fun. Masters 2 without Liquid was so boring
[edit] and I noticed TL pulls some viewers
Scream Daddy save the day ! Thanks to everyone in TL , I hecking love you guys ! LETS GO LIQUID ~~~~
cant wait to see the content from tl, so many crazy moments and in the end, they qualified. crazy. cant imagine how it feels from their pov
respect for m3c, they did well throughout the year but just always so so so close. i really like liquid but with m3c being free agents there is more at stake for them. gl and support both teams!
So fucking sad bro...
Once again a shameful performance from Liquid internationally
:(
Scream really went 91/60kd, 20-13 first kill to first death, 300acs/200adr on 45hs% to deny M3C from qualifying. Actually one of the GOAT performances in Val history. Sad for my M3C boys 😞