ggwp zeta :)
ZETA
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.61 1.47 1.71 | 298 237 340 | 22 7 15 | / 12 6 6 / | 8 1 7 | +10 +1 +9 | 85% 88% 83% | 187 164 203 | 25% 50% 19% | 3 0 3 | 2 0 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.22 1.33 1.15 | 158 191 138 | 11 5 6 | / 9 5 4 / | 6 4 2 | +2 0 +2 | 80% 75% 83% | 119 139 105 | 39% 43% 36% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.19 0.91 1.38 | 189 178 198 | 15 5 10 | / 12 7 5 / | 6 2 4 | +3 -2 +5 | 80% 75% 83% | 116 94 131 | 28% 15% 35% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.97 0.54 1.25 | 190 139 225 | 14 4 10 | / 13 7 6 / | 3 0 3 | +1 -3 +4 | 65% 38% 83% | 117 94 132 | 15% 8% 18% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.96 0.07 1.55 | 231 105 315 | 15 3 12 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 3 3 | 0 -4 +4 | 75% 50% 92% | 184 66 262 | 19% 13% 20% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.19 1.33 0.98 | 214 264 139 | 16 12 4 | / 14 10 4 / | 2 1 1 | +2 +2 0 | 80% 75% 88% | 136 154 109 | 28% 29% 25% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.82 0.41 1.44 | 208 115 349 | 15 4 11 | / 17 11 6 / | 1 1 0 | -2 -7 +5 | 60% 42% 88% | 136 86 212 | 34% 31% 36% | 4 2 2 | 2 2 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.66 0.86 0.36 | 128 200 20 | 9 8 1 | / 14 10 4 / | 3 3 0 | -5 -2 -3 | 60% 58% 63% | 92 132 32 | 56% 62% 33% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.59 0.15 1.26 | 176 71 334 | 12 2 10 | / 17 12 5 / | 5 4 1 | -5 -10 +5 | 55% 42% 75% | 121 54 223 | 24% 11% 33% | 3 1 2 | 6 4 2 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.56 0.24 1.04 | 112 56 198 | 8 2 6 | / 15 11 4 / | 2 2 0 | -7 -9 +2 | 70% 50% 100% | 80 46 131 | 29% 11% 40% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.81 1.04 1.32 | 242 288 219 | 52 24 28 | / 36 10 26 / | 10 2 8 | +16 +14 +2 | 72% 86% 64% | 157 191 138 | 24% 31% 20% | 3 0 3 | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.06 1.14 1.11 | 197 188 205 | 39 14 25 | / 38 14 24 / | 12 6 6 | +1 0 +1 | 72% 86% 64% | 126 125 127 | 43% 41% 44% | 5 1 4 | 6 2 4 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.12 0.83 0.93 | 173 221 154 | 37 16 21 | / 42 16 26 / | 18 10 8 | -5 0 -5 | 72% 86% 64% | 119 137 108 | 29% 30% 29% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.88 0.90 0.90 | 210 237 196 | 40 18 22 | / 43 16 27 / | 14 7 7 | -3 +2 -5 | 70% 62% 75% | 141 144 139 | 21% 25% 18% | 10 4 6 | 10 6 4 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.61 0.73 0.68 | 149 135 163 | 31 10 21 | / 42 15 27 / | 7 2 5 | -11 -5 -6 | 58% 57% 58% | 94 81 101 | 18% 9% 22% | 5 3 2 | 10 3 7 | -5 0 -5 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.59 0.80 1.30 | 229 272 158 | 50 39 11 | / 35 19 16 / | 4 2 2 | +15 +20 -5 | 77% 83% 67% | 151 174 111 | 33% 31% 36% | 5 3 2 | 2 1 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.16 1.28 1.20 | 279 245 327 | 54 29 25 | / 43 25 18 / | 10 8 2 | +11 +4 +7 | 75% 69% 86% | 176 168 190 | 36% 43% 28% | 13 6 7 | 3 3 0 | +10 +3 +7 | |
|
0.78 1.11 0.91 | 216 171 297 | 41 21 20 | / 43 26 17 / | 14 9 5 | -2 -5 +3 | 74% 69% 81% | 152 123 201 | 25% 27% 23% | 6 4 2 | 13 7 6 | -7 -3 -4 | |
|
0.92 0.51 0.77 | 123 156 60 | 24 19 5 | / 35 22 13 / | 22 18 4 | -11 -3 -8 | 68% 72% 62% | 82 102 47 | 49% 58% 27% | 3 3 0 | 3 2 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.81 0.54 0.70 | 158 173 128 | 31 21 10 | / 43 26 17 / | 8 7 1 | -12 -5 -7 | 65% 64% 67% | 103 113 87 | 23% 25% 19% | 4 3 1 | 4 4 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
ZETA
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.06 1.12 1.03 | 205 167 221 | 12 3 9 | / 13 3 10 / | 1 1 0 | -1 0 -1 | 59% 60% 58% | 135 121 141 | 26% 43% 23% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.80 2.15 0.23 | 205 442 106 | 12 9 3 | / 14 3 11 / | 3 1 2 | -2 +6 -8 | 59% 60% 58% | 117 254 60 | 33% 29% 44% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.67 0.71 0.65 | 181 244 155 | 11 5 6 | / 16 5 11 / | 1 0 1 | -5 0 -5 | 59% 80% 50% | 109 139 96 | 45% 50% 42% | 2 1 1 | 3 0 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.44 0.45 0.43 | 105 88 113 | 5 1 4 | / 14 3 11 / | 2 1 1 | -9 -2 -7 | 53% 80% 42% | 74 62 79 | 14% 0% 20% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.33 0.55 0.23 | 83 105 74 | 3 1 2 | / 14 3 11 / | 6 4 2 | -11 -2 -9 | 53% 80% 42% | 61 67 59 | 13% 20% 11% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.65 1.56 1.84 | 365 335 438 | 21 13 8 | / 11 7 4 / | 3 3 0 | +10 +6 +4 | 88% 92% 80% | 229 226 237 | 54% 57% 46% | 5 3 2 | 1 1 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.44 1.82 0.52 | 216 247 141 | 14 12 2 | / 7 2 5 / | 2 1 1 | +7 +10 -3 | 76% 92% 40% | 130 150 84 | 19% 13% 67% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.24 1.16 1.45 | 203 172 280 | 14 9 5 | / 7 4 3 / | 1 0 1 | +7 +5 +2 | 82% 83% 80% | 142 129 173 | 43% 50% 33% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.21 1.29 1.02 | 164 183 118 | 10 8 2 | / 7 5 2 / | 12 10 2 | +3 +3 0 | 88% 92% 80% | 103 113 78 | 67% 71% 50% | 3 3 0 | 0 0 0 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.90 1.33 0.02 | 191 266 12 | 12 12 0 | / 11 6 5 / | 1 1 0 | +1 +6 -5 | 59% 67% 40% | 114 157 12 | 29% 29% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 |
ZETA
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 1.02 1.61 | 253 151 321 | 17 4 13 | / 13 4 9 / | 5 2 3 | +4 0 +4 | 75% 100% 58% | 148 101 179 | 45% 33% 50% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.25 2.58 0.37 | 223 414 97 | 18 14 4 | / 11 1 10 / | 1 0 1 | +7 +13 -6 | 70% 100% 50% | 147 262 69 | 21% 22% 18% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.20 1.69 0.87 | 248 335 191 | 19 10 9 | / 16 6 10 / | 6 4 2 | +3 +4 -1 | 80% 100% 67% | 170 224 134 | 38% 38% 38% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.91 0.89 0.93 | 195 242 165 | 13 6 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | 75% 75% 75% | 119 152 97 | 16% 29% 11% | 4 1 3 | 2 2 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.61 0.78 0.51 | 153 160 150 | 12 5 7 | / 15 5 10 / | 2 1 1 | -3 0 -3 | 55% 63% 50% | 88 81 93 | 24% 15% 29% | 2 2 0 | 5 1 4 | -3 +1 -4 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.30 1.63 0.80 | 257 303 188 | 20 15 5 | / 14 7 7 / | 0 0 0 | +6 +8 -2 | 75% 83% 63% | 183 218 131 | 44% 48% 36% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.21 1.50 0.76 | 265 285 236 | 18 12 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 4 2 | +3 +5 -2 | 80% 75% 88% | 171 192 139 | 25% 35% 17% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.93 1.05 0.76 | 270 270 271 | 15 10 5 | / 19 10 9 / | 8 5 3 | -4 0 -4 | 85% 83% 88% | 190 185 197 | 18% 24% 10% | 3 3 0 | 6 3 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.67 0.86 0.37 | 170 196 131 | 11 7 4 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 4 1 | -6 -2 -4 | 65% 75% 50% | 118 136 90 | 15% 24% 7% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.51 0.63 0.33 | 76 85 64 | 5 3 2 | / 14 7 7 / | 7 5 2 | -9 -4 -5 | 60% 67% 50% | 53 60 43 | 26% 36% 13% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
respect for ZETA but liquid water don't evaporate just yet
liquid 2-1 ZETA (close series)
13-10
12-14
13-11
Potential, and likely, regional matchup here in BR/BR or EMEA/EMEA in whatever crazy world we live in.
I'll take the BR/BR matchup, LOUD stomp their regional blood again.
LOUD 2-0 NIP
liquid looks overrated in this tournament, I believe in Zeta in a tight fight 2/1
Wtf? they literally are not rated at all since they did not properly qualify for the tournament after a poor Challengers season. Now that they have arrived, however, they look great... so your take is just so uninformed and absurd, lol.
after the match vs Xerxia, it was clear to me that this is not the same team as it was a year ago, at the most decisive moments neither jamppi or screams look confident, todays match with the Loud was an exemplary execution of this team, even if they win Zeta, I dont see a chance for them against other tier1 teams from Eu or boyz from Korea
TL is different in terms of player dependance. There is no dedicated duelists. Jamppi plays initiator and duelist, ScreaM plays that and Sentinel, Soulcass plays similar to Jamppi. They have a unorthodox approach to team comp. Which in my opinion is cool.
This guy is an FPX fan, AKA a Team Liquid hater.
TL proved everyone wrong and showed how they deserved the spot
I’m not a hate team, but Im stating the fact that 2 stars of this roster, the guys who performed on tier in cs and showed a good result last year are now in terrible shape, if this is a hatred for you, then yes
Team Liquid literally didn't deserve the spot lmao. It was because FPX couldn't appear, they got the spot. I don't hate any of these teams but your statement that Team Liquid deserves this is soo wrong.
so what dude , they did well in playoffs if they win master will you still be saying they didnt deserve spot , ya they they didnt qualify but they got a chance which was not there fault they didnt attacked on ukraine to get spot in masters so why decredit them . its just disrespectfull
Your take is terrible my guy im sorry to say. Zeta 2-1d liquid because they are kinda washed right now. They arent looking as good as their champions team last year, probably have to work on that, but also fpx DESERVED number 1 emea, and team liquid werent meant to qualify. They 2-0d TL and fnatic and 3-1d g2. The only reason they do now is because the ukraine incident and also the fnatic roster losing half their members, making team liquid look like 2nd in Europe.
looks like you were wrong. Liquid didn't really qualify for this tournament and it showed in this match why they need to make significant changes. 2-1 Zeta against a champion top 4. Sadge
Not Overrated but favourites because they were the consistent EU team to progress to International level. Zeta were the overall better team of the day, that's it.
Yo, but they didn't and honest to god props on them that was some amazing ass Valorant to watch. I don't have a specific team I want to win all I know is that I want EMEA to lose so it's cool seeing Zeta pull this.
DRX is gonna win the entire thing if they beat optic which I think they will
Actually don't know what to expect. If Zeta is in form as when they face G2, liquid is in trouble.
i think the same , zeta played better than liquid
G2 13-4x2 - liquid , G2 13-7,13-10 Zeta
Liquid 2-0 Mid diff c'mon it's Japan Based on their recent games they are good prob gonna challenge 1 game to it but. I believe Liquid still wins here
ZETA 2-0 Fnatic
ZETA 0-2 G2
...then
ZETA 2-0 Liquid
as a Japanese EMEA fan, it is heartbreaking to watch these matches
I hecking love TENNN, zeta division wins 2-1 by wire thin margins. (Hopium) Nivera/Jammpii/ScreaM has been so fun to watch but I will always root for a "minor region" team over NA/EU.
I was horribly wrong
I will be atoning for the sin of underestimating '//,
gg
TL 2-0 ZETA
competitive first map but TL will wrap up the second map fast
13-11
13-4
I know Liquid is really superior to ZETA, but I loved their showings in this tournament. IMO if they ever play Icebox I think ZETA has a chance of winning a map, and MAYBE on Split.
So 2x1 for Liquid here, close maps cause ZETA has improved a lot and will fight for their lives!
If TENNN And Dep Show Up it's an Easy 2-0
but if they don't then Team Liquid takes this Easily.
The way zeta has been playing so far, they could very realistically win this.
dep < scream
sugarz3ro > l1nk
tennn > soulcas
laz >= nivera
crow < jamppi
toss up but i favor liquid slightly
I'd like to see a TL 2-0 but they are looking a little sloppy so probably 2-1 or very close 2-0 if they get it
ZETA mainly centers their strategy around their aiming alongside a few set-pieces which is the opposite to Liquid where I believe runs a more set-piece heavy play-style. ZETA’s play-style can be seen struggling in the initial match against DRX who contains both the aim AND the strategies as seen in the match against Paper Rex and more but this is much further into the tourney now thus I strongly believe that ZETA’s aim would play a massive role in this matchup against Liquid with how shaky Liquid looked with their strats. I think a scoreline of ZETA 2:1 Liquid, ZETA boldly choosing Split, Liquid choosing Icebox and Fracture left over.
Laz is japanese yay
ten is japaneas tenZ
sugarz3ro is japanese nats
dep sometimes becomes Ladiff
crow? idk lol
ZETA cannot beat 7 teams that qualified
But it was great job ZETA
Liquid 2-0 ZETA
idk man realistically TL win this one but Zeta's run reminds me a lot of Kru's run during champion
TL ban Bind
Zeta ban Ascent
TL pick Split
Zeta pick Icebox
TL ban Fracture
Zeta ban Breeze
Haven remains
Split: Liquid 13 – 9 Zeta
Icebox: Liquid 10 – 13 Zeta
Haven: Liquid 13 – 5 Zeta
not saying zeta is a bad team but if liquid lose I'm changing my flair to global esports
TL ban Fracture
Zeta ban Split
TL pick Ascent
Zeta pick Haven
TL ban Icebox
Zeta ban Breeze
Bind remains
If Icebox or Fracture is on the map pool, Zeta could very possible take the W here.
With this veto, 2-1 Liquid.
Fracture - 13 - 10 Zeta
Haven - 13 - 7 Liquid
Split - 13 - 10 - Liquid
TL easy 2-0 if Nivera is perma chamber and no ScreaM kay/o. 2-1 TL if the same shit as last time
hello zeta division. i am your new coach. this is the strat to beat liquid tomorrw.
5 duelist
unplug jampi computer
find site that soulcas is holding and 5 rush
EZ 13-0.
You're welcome, i expect my $300000 bonus by next week.
WHY ARE THEY PLAYING SO FUCKIN SCARED????
Jett and neon comp and they're just holding angles until 20 seconds left. 0 head
Laz moves waait tooo much when oping. He already lost 3 easy duels because he moved the second someone peeked.
For Zeta on Defense, the strat was to spam utilities and play angles with shorty. I wanna see if they also have a unique offense strat lol.
Liquid should've never went to Iceland in the first place, how tf Guild lost to these bots
Not to mention undeserved 4th seed above Gambit
TL hasn't really played much fracture in their latest series and it was ZETA map pick. I wouldn't be surprised if it's going to be 2-1 for TL as they are more confident on haven and split.
"g2 aLmoSt loSt to ZetA, so baD!"
Convincingly won 2-0
Meanwhile TL dropping a map to them and struggling in 3rd map
G2 played well. But "convincingly" is how TL just won Haven on ZETA, not how G2 2-0'd them.
Yes I agree. They convincingly lost fracture and split while they convincingly won haven. However, I'm still saying G2 played well but they didn't 2-0'd ZETA convincingly. And I'm neither rooting for TL or G2, I sympathize with both teams but don't have any preference if one or the other proves to be better. I'd just like one of them to be convincingly consistent. I hope tomorrow G2 will be that team.
⢸⣿⡿⠛⠁⠀⠀⣰⣿⡿⠁⠀⣼⣿⡟
⢸⠟⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⡿⠁⠀⣼⣿⡟
⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⡟⠀⠀⣼⣿⡟
⠀⣰⣿⡟⠀⠀⣼⣿⡟
⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⡟⠀⠀⣼⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⡄
⠀⠀⣼⣿⡟⠀⢀⣾⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⡇
⠀⣼⣿⡟⠀⢀⣾⣿⠏⠀⠀⣀⣤⣾⣿⡇
Bottom frag and down 7-12 and instead of dropping your rifle to your best player you just hold onto it lmao that's a coaching issue
I WON 5000 EUROS, WE DESERVE IT ZETA IS BESTTTTTTTTTTT, SHIBUYA DRUNKKKKKKK ALL NIGHT LESSSS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Huge respect to Zeta they really played so well, nt Team Liquid comeback stronger
โง่แบบช่วยไม่ได้
กูลงZeta+1.5
กูขอรับเงินมึงไปแทนละกัน
อดซื้อ Skin Nightmarket ไปนะไอควาย!!!!
มึงควรจะหาข้อมูลให้มากกว่านี้นะ
Zeta แนวโน้มที่จะชนะแม่งโครตมีโอกาส
เสือกโง่ แทงพนันแบบไม่รู้ไม่เตรียมข้อมูล
มึงก็แค่ Rank IRON ที่รู้จักแค่ทีมไม่กี่ทีม
มึงเห็น TL ดังกว่าแล้วคิดว่าZETA จะสู้ไม่ได้??
ทีงี่ชัดเจนแล้วนะ นี้Valorant อะไรก็เกิดขึ้นได้
จำไว้ซะด้วย ไอโง่!
กูแทงสูงครับไอโง่ อีกแค่ round เดียวกูก็ได้แล้ว แต่ไม่คิดว่ามันโง่เหมือนมึงที่กันได้แค่ round เดียว ส่วนกูได้ prx มากกว่าเงินเดือนแม่มึงทั้งชีวิตมึงอีก
ได้ครั้งแรกอย่าดีใจไอควายกูแทงก่อนมึงโหลดวาโรมาเล่นอีก
สาเหตุของโรคติดการพนัน (Pathological Gambling)
-โรคทางสมอง : จากงานวิจัย พบว่า สมองของผู้ที่ติดการพนันจะมีความแตกต่างจากคนทั่วไป เช่น ระบบการควบคุมหรือยับยั้งชั่งใจตัวเอง นอกจากนี้ยังพบว่าปริมาณสารสื่อประสาทที่ชื่อเซโรโทนินลดลงต่ำกว่าปกติ สมองบางส่วนทำงานน้อยลง มีการหลังของสารโดปามีนมากขึ้น ทำให้ต้องพึ่งพากิจกรรมที่มีความตื้นเต้นเพื่อสร้างความสุข
-พันธุกรรม : หากคนในครอบครัวมีประวัติติดการพนัน พบว่าอาการเหล่านี้จะส่งผลทางพันธุกรรมด้วย
-สิ่งแวดล้อม : สิ่งแวดล้อมมีส่วนสำคัญที่ทำให้ติดการพนันเป็นอย่างมาก เช่น มีบ่อนพนันอยู่ในชุมชน คนรอบตัวเล่นการพนัน เป็นต้น
-สิ่งยั่วยุและสื่อ : ปัจจุบันเราอินเทอร์เน็ตมีอิทธิพลต่อเราอย่างมาก เรามักเห็นโฆษณาคาสิโนออนไลน์หรือแอปพลิเคชันเล่นพนันออนไลน์อยู่ทั่วไปบนเว็บไซต์ และนี่ก็คืออีกหนึ่งสาเหตุที่ทำให้เกิดความอยากรู้อยากลองจนนำไปสู่การติดการพนันและต้องหาวิธีเลิกการพนันเด็ดขาด
แทงแพ้ไปไอควาย เดวซักวันมึงก็โดนแดกหมด 5555 โคตรโง่ดูเกมก็ไม่เป็น เดวกุฟ้องพ่อแม่มึงแน่ ว่ามึงมันเป็นไอเด็กเหี้ยติดพนัน หิวเงินมาก มาขอเงินกุได้น่ะ แต่ว่ามีข้อแลกเปลี่ยนคือ กุขอเย็ดหีแม่มึงก่อน เดวกุให้เงินน่ะ 5555555555
มึงมากกว่าที่โง่ไอควายอย่ามาพูด โง่ถึงขนาดตั้งชื่อด่า โง่ที่แทงเสีย
ไอควาย ควายแท้ๆ
ไอเหี้ยนี้ มันโง่ 55555 ทำมาพูดกูแทงได้เงินเดือนมากกว่าพ่อแม่มึง ควาย ไม่มีไรจะด่าแล้งรึไง KEKW KEKW
มึงอยากดูที่กูแทงมั้ย
กูเริ่มแทงเมื่อวานตั้งแต่ บ่ายโมง DOTA2 , VALORANT , CSGO
10คู่กูแทงถูกหมดมึงจะได้รู้ว่ามึงกระจอก
ถ้ามึงทำได้10คู่ไม่มีแพ้แบบกูแล้วค่อยมาพูดนะไอควาย User โง่ๆมึงอ่ะ
if na does not play against himself they would not pass from quarterfinals, just Yay and Marved are top tier players from NA.
Today TL played so slow with bad tactics while ZETA prepared every skill setups so well. ZETA deserve this win, and I hope they go as far as they can. A team always trying hard to overcome their enemy
Your take is terrible my guy im sorry to say. Zeta 2-1d liquid because they are kinda washed right now. They arent looking as good as their champions team last year, probably have to work on that, but also fpx DESERVED number 1 emea, and team liquid werent meant to qualify. They 2-0d TL and fnatic and 3-1d g2. The only reason they do now is because the ukraine incident and also the fnatic roster losing half their members, making team liquid look like 2nd in Europe.
my preds are wrong now.
anyway i wonder who's getting dropped after this event, im betting on either sliggy or soulcas ? sliggy i think.