Bye bye Liquid
TL
MIBR
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.27 1.00 1.42 | 193 97 250 | 14 3 11 | / 10 3 7 / | 3 0 3 | +4 0 +4 | 63% 71% 58% | 122 69 153 | 44% 50% 42% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.16 1.34 1.06 | 242 296 212 | 15 7 8 | / 13 5 8 / | 5 3 2 | +2 +2 0 | 79% 86% 75% | 158 190 139 | 25% 25% 25% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.12 1.02 1.18 | 198 201 197 | 15 6 9 | / 12 4 8 / | 3 0 3 | +3 +2 +1 | 84% 86% 83% | 124 124 124 | 20% 36% 13% | 6 3 3 | 0 0 0 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
0.95 1.08 0.88 | 187 183 189 | 13 5 8 | / 13 4 9 / | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | 63% 86% 50% | 126 120 129 | 31% 17% 40% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.82 1.09 0.66 | 154 240 105 | 11 6 5 | / 11 4 7 / | 2 1 1 | 0 +2 -2 | 74% 86% 67% | 105 164 70 | 36% 33% 40% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.26 1.42 1.00 | 231 242 214 | 16 11 5 | / 12 7 5 / | 6 3 3 | +4 +4 0 | 74% 75% 71% | 155 164 139 | 21% 25% 13% | 3 3 0 | 0 0 0 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.00 1.00 0.99 | 183 150 240 | 12 7 5 | / 13 7 6 / | 8 5 3 | -1 0 -1 | 79% 75% 86% | 125 106 158 | 27% 32% 22% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.87 0.90 0.81 | 169 175 159 | 12 7 5 | / 14 8 6 / | 4 3 1 | -2 -1 -1 | 74% 67% 86% | 125 113 145 | 37% 35% 40% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.63 0.77 0.38 | 156 213 58 | 10 9 1 | / 14 9 5 / | 2 1 1 | -4 0 -4 | 68% 67% 71% | 101 133 46 | 23% 33% 0% | 2 2 0 | 4 2 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.53 0.51 0.57 | 158 147 178 | 9 5 4 | / 15 10 5 / | 4 3 1 | -6 -5 -1 | 53% 58% 43% | 105 104 107 | 14% 13% 15% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.15 1.50 1.33 | 201 169 232 | 31 13 18 | / 20 10 10 / | 9 4 5 | +11 +3 +8 | 72% 79% 65% | 130 110 150 | 51% 52% 50% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.13 1.23 1.18 | 240 259 223 | 33 18 15 | / 27 15 12 / | 12 7 5 | +6 +3 +3 | 77% 79% 75% | 162 176 149 | 29% 32% 26% | 5 3 2 | 2 0 2 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.02 1.18 1.12 | 198 201 197 | 15 6 9 | / 12 4 8 / | 3 0 3 | +3 +2 +1 | 84% 86% 83% | 124 124 124 | 20% 36% 13% | 6 3 3 | 0 0 0 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.11 0.90 1.02 | 176 240 82 | 14 11 3 | / 10 7 3 / | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | 80% 83% 75% | 107 143 54 | 29% 32% 22% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.91 1.11 1.01 | 199 205 195 | 28 14 14 | / 26 14 12 / | 8 3 5 | +2 0 +2 | 79% 84% 75% | 132 135 130 | 29% 32% 26% | 7 4 3 | 5 3 2 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.95 0.87 0.91 | 185 164 206 | 25 11 14 | / 29 12 17 / | 12 7 5 | -4 -1 -3 | 69% 79% 60% | 129 117 139 | 31% 27% 33% | 4 2 2 | 2 0 2 | +2 +2 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 1.32 1.31 | 258 263 253 | 35 19 16 | / 28 14 14 / | 15 5 10 | +7 +5 +2 | 82% 85% 79% | 176 177 175 | 27% 29% 24% | 3 3 0 | 1 0 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
0.79 0.96 0.88 | 183 170 197 | 27 12 15 | / 30 15 15 / | 8 5 3 | -3 -3 0 | 74% 70% 79% | 118 107 128 | 33% 28% 37% | 1 0 1 | 7 3 4 | -6 -3 -3 | |
|
0.74 0.82 0.78 | 168 185 151 | 22 12 10 | / 28 14 14 / | 7 2 5 | -6 -2 -4 | 67% 65% 68% | 122 116 127 | 33% 31% 36% | 4 2 2 | 7 3 4 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.66 0.72 0.69 | 163 125 202 | 21 9 12 | / 30 14 16 / | 14 6 8 | -9 -5 -4 | 74% 70% 79% | 113 94 134 | 24% 31% 19% | 2 1 1 | 5 2 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.65 0.50 0.58 | 153 161 145 | 19 10 9 | / 30 16 14 / | 7 4 3 | -11 -6 -5 | 64% 60% 68% | 103 112 93 | 14% 17% 12% | 3 2 1 | 6 4 2 | -3 -2 -1 |
TL
MIBR
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 1.24 1.62 | 208 210 206 | 17 10 7 | / 10 7 3 / | 6 4 2 | +7 +3 +4 | 80% 83% 75% | 138 135 144 | 57% 53% 67% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.20 0.81 1.79 | 243 185 331 | 17 8 9 | / 15 10 5 / | 6 2 4 | +2 -2 +4 | 85% 83% 88% | 159 118 219 | 26% 30% 21% | 6 3 3 | 3 3 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.19 1.01 1.47 | 238 238 238 | 18 11 7 | / 14 10 4 / | 7 4 3 | +4 +1 +3 | 75% 75% 75% | 166 167 164 | 32% 36% 28% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.02 1.11 0.90 | 176 240 82 | 14 11 3 | / 10 7 3 / | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | 80% 83% 75% | 107 143 54 | 29% 32% 22% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.87 0.87 0.86 | 183 153 231 | 12 6 6 | / 16 8 8 / | 10 6 4 | -4 -2 -2 | 75% 75% 75% | 131 116 154 | 30% 36% 25% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.10 1.52 | 284 295 277 | 19 8 11 | / 16 7 9 / | 9 2 7 | +3 +1 +2 | 90% 100% 83% | 196 197 196 | 33% 35% 31% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.92 0.69 1.08 | 179 142 205 | 12 3 9 | / 14 5 9 / | 5 1 4 | -2 -2 0 | 65% 63% 67% | 141 92 174 | 43% 27% 53% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.88 0.62 1.05 | 196 162 219 | 15 5 10 | / 16 7 9 / | 4 2 2 | -1 -2 +1 | 75% 75% 75% | 111 98 119 | 30% 20% 36% | 1 0 1 | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.62 0.85 0.46 | 148 182 126 | 10 5 5 | / 15 6 9 / | 3 1 2 | -5 -1 -4 | 75% 63% 83% | 100 125 84 | 16% 25% 10% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.40 0.16 0.56 | 143 88 180 | 9 2 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 6 1 5 | -8 -5 -3 | 70% 63% 75% | 102 76 120 | 19% 29% 17% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 |
i love mibr but you gotta think its impossible with the goat nATS back
tl 2-1 mibr sadly
TL downgrading from penny to shAts is only going to decrease their chances of winning this game
Oh yeah your right. I could never disagree with another sen flair. KING ASPAS
Nevermind my goat penny is playing replacing s0ri0l on some maps TL might actually have a chance now
oh yeah thats true, the comps liquid prepped for with penny is also gone as well. Will be rough but I still feel they have a shot
LMAO MIBR frauds got demolished, nats the goat, Asspas lives up to his name 💀
TL 2-0 MIBR, if third map then MIBR 2-1. Nats cooked SEN so idk if Aspas can do it all alone vs TL + Nats
Hard to predict on this one, MIBR looks worse than expected and TL looks better than expected
I slightly favor TL, but it's still 55-45 for me
hoping nAts is well rested and prepared for the match day
nAts' aura alone blasts through MIBR's pcs and sends them to NearestAirport like the 1-13 they are.
nAts comes back to save the horse. Mibr are being weird consistency-wise lately
i dont believe nats would make much a difference here since penny was the reason they went 3 maps to blg.
aspas will wake up mibr 2-1 tl
by far the worst insight I've seen on chat lol penny was expected to perform well despite of what Tier he is playing on NA
and nAts as the captain of TL playing again, definitely different and higher caliber than what they had against BLG
yea penny was good - as a fragger, u know there is much difference when you have the best igl in the world in the team between having 3 players who call every round.
nAts is my only GOAT, so I'll cope TL losses by blaming his teammates for potential crypto throwing.
I give them a 0-5% chance of winning. Although that number seems familiar, cant remember tho..
Se o MIBR ganhou da Falcons no CS, também é possível ganhar essa partida.
VAMOS MIBR.
aspas almost beat him in that regard (wait aspas literally did bot frag 😭)
Mibr bans Haven TL bans Pearl
Mibr picks Icebox TL picks Lotus
Mibr bans Split TL bans Sunset
Ascent remains
That's true. Mibr might first ban that too. I'm still shaken that I almost had the TH vs Wol prediction correct.
Liquid. Showed great game play wha' mibr seemed. Clues less and nats is so consistent as an igl caise yes he is the liquid igl which means they battle without or with a diff igl + penny was on fire soo liquid gonna spread mibr apart
they werent clueless, 4 of their players werent even shooting back lol, never in my life seen 4 of the same team be the worst 4 rated players at an event before
mibr got icebox i think they'll win map 1 and once they get their first win they'll lose their nervousness and be able to warm up into winning the series
MiBR 2-0 TL
Guys is there any answer why Serial is not playing today?! He played last game against BLG
Playing serial when they need a senti other than nAts and penny when they need 2 duelists, they're experimenting in the middle of Masters bruh.
Based on the circumstances, So limited prac i guess it's fine to try so. They won't really care if they lost
has a team in masters and champs history EVER swapped players mid match in between maps? Obviously they can swap players with subs for certain games but ive never seen mid match before wtf
Vision Strikers (now DRX) at Masters Berlin and Champions 2021?
They ran a six-man roster, with K1ng in the main lineup while Lakia only played on Bind and Icebox.
Aside from the fact that Team Liquid is playing very well today, the worst thing the American teams (KRU, EG, C9 or 100T) have done is give "wings" to MIBR, they don't play at all, they want to play with pure aim, Liquid reads them like a book and Aspas has been missing all Masters, they just show up without any use... what a piece of garbage of a team
TH 🤝 MIBR
TH PRX 3 MAPS ❌
GENG PRX 3 MAPS ❌
GENG MIBR 3 MAPS ❌
TL MIBR 3 MAPS ❌
SEN BLG 3 MAPS ✅
BLG TL 3 MAPS (with stand in no nats) ✅
WOLVES 2-0 TH ✅ (largest upset of the tournament )
totally not a scripted DEI e-sport
wow i've never seen a team sub in a player for a specific map that is genuinely so dope.
Vision Strikers (now DRX) had done it before at Masters Berlin and Champions 2021, but it had definitely been a while.
I had a feeling when MIBR lost super badly to SEN/G2 they would bomb out of swiss. Unfortunately Americas is a 2 team region :/