Naos 2-0
NAOS
FCY
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.96 1.44 0.39 | 179 207 146 | 13 9 4 | / 15 5 10 / | 8 6 2 | -2 +4 -6 | 77% 83% 70% | 126 149 98 | 30% 33% 25% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.91 1.03 0.76 | 192 175 213 | 14 7 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 2 0 2 | -3 0 -3 | 73% 75% 70% | 134 124 145 | 25% 25% 26% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.86 1.11 0.56 | 242 280 198 | 20 14 6 | / 19 9 10 / | 2 1 1 | +1 +5 -4 | 68% 75% 60% | 141 145 137 | 19% 17% 21% | 5 3 2 | 5 2 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.85 0.95 0.73 | 201 189 218 | 15 8 7 | / 18 8 10 / | 9 6 3 | -3 0 -3 | 73% 75% 70% | 154 153 155 | 25% 21% 30% | 2 1 1 | 3 3 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.78 0.98 0.54 | 156 164 147 | 12 7 5 | / 17 7 10 / | 9 6 3 | -5 0 -5 | 64% 75% 50% | 111 124 96 | 19% 20% 19% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 1.45 1.46 | 296 256 330 | 24 11 13 | / 16 6 10 / | 4 1 3 | +8 +5 +3 | 73% 80% 67% | 197 167 222 | 38% 38% 38% | 5 1 4 | 3 2 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
1.13 1.67 0.69 | 226 341 130 | 19 14 5 | / 13 6 7 / | 3 2 1 | +6 +8 -2 | 64% 80% 50% | 161 226 107 | 27% 29% 25% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.11 1.29 0.95 | 228 263 200 | 18 9 9 | / 18 7 11 / | 7 5 2 | 0 +2 -2 | 77% 80% 75% | 149 180 123 | 45% 33% 59% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.08 1.27 0.91 | 181 248 126 | 14 11 3 | / 13 6 7 / | 8 2 6 | +1 +5 -4 | 82% 80% 83% | 136 191 91 | 37% 42% 31% | 3 1 2 | 2 2 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.87 1.35 0.46 | 148 191 113 | 11 7 4 | / 14 6 8 / | 14 7 7 | -3 +1 -4 | 86% 100% 75% | 106 145 74 | 39% 33% 50% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.42 1.23 1.32 | 213 203 217 | 50 14 18 | / 36 9 15 / | 27 9 13 | +14 +5 +3 | 80% 74% 86% | 134 142 127 | 27% 33% 24% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.13 0.89 1.00 | 215 217 210 | 39 13 17 | / 47 13 18 / | 11 1 3 | -8 0 -1 | 73% 68% 77% | 140 142 139 | 19% 26% 13% | 5 2 3 | 3 1 2 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.68 1.15 0.93 | 207 143 263 | 51 9 20 | / 48 14 19 / | 35 8 16 | +3 -5 +1 | 78% 68% 86% | 148 119 174 | 23% 19% 26% | 2 1 1 | 5 5 0 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
1.04 0.81 0.91 | 210 183 226 | 46 13 18 | / 50 13 21 / | 18 9 4 | -4 0 -3 | 78% 84% 73% | 134 133 135 | 19% 20% 18% | 5 0 5 | 0 0 0 | +5 0 +5 | |
|
1.10 0.69 0.88 | 205 242 179 | 43 20 12 | / 51 14 19 / | 11 1 8 | -8 +6 -7 | 78% 79% 77% | 132 128 135 | 18% 13% 23% | 9 5 4 | 8 3 5 | +1 +2 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.23 1.31 1.26 | 266 240 301 | 52 21 21 | / 47 17 15 / | 13 4 3 | +5 +4 +6 | 73% 73% 74% | 179 161 201 | 35% 40% 31% | 5 1 4 | 6 4 2 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
1.20 1.24 1.22 | 250 233 267 | 55 18 17 | / 47 17 16 / | 33 15 9 | +8 +1 +1 | 85% 86% 84% | 161 155 168 | 31% 27% 35% | 5 2 3 | 3 1 2 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.10 0.90 1.01 | 198 241 145 | 40 21 7 | / 44 18 11 / | 23 6 8 | -4 +3 -4 | 83% 86% 79% | 136 165 102 | 37% 37% 38% | 3 1 2 | 3 3 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.10 0.51 0.83 | 188 273 96 | 51 23 6 | / 45 18 12 / | 7 3 1 | +6 +5 -6 | 59% 68% 47% | 132 178 80 | 32% 35% 25% | 4 4 0 | 8 5 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.92 0.71 0.82 | 155 151 159 | 21 11 10 | / 30 17 13 / | 28 17 11 | -9 -6 -3 | 88% 95% 79% | 108 111 106 | 30% 20% 46% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
13 | / 16 / | 6 | -3 |
NAOS
FCY
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.73 1.39 1.93 | 246 197 275 | 19 5 14 | / 9 4 5 / | 14 3 11 | +10 +1 +9 | 84% 57% 100% | 143 129 152 | 25% 31% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.11 1.31 0.99 | 237 288 208 | 16 6 10 | / 14 6 8 / | 2 1 1 | +2 0 +2 | 74% 57% 83% | 148 171 134 | 14% 28% 7% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.07 1.13 1.04 | 263 216 292 | 19 6 13 | / 17 6 11 / | 4 3 1 | +2 0 +2 | 95% 100% 92% | 162 150 169 | 19% 21% 18% | 5 0 5 | 0 0 0 | +5 0 +5 | |
|
1.03 0.22 1.50 | 213 66 300 | 14 1 13 | / 15 6 9 / | 15 2 13 | -1 -5 +4 | 84% 57% 100% | 142 60 190 | 21% 11% 23% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.90 1.08 0.80 | 168 178 163 | 12 6 6 | / 14 5 9 / | 7 0 7 | -2 +1 -3 | 89% 86% 92% | 121 100 133 | 17% 5% 25% | 4 2 2 | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.12 1.74 | 272 208 383 | 17 9 8 | / 15 10 5 / | 17 10 7 | +2 -1 +3 | 95% 92% 100% | 175 134 245 | 22% 21% 22% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.04 1.05 1.04 | 236 228 251 | 18 10 8 | / 16 11 5 / | 3 3 0 | +2 -1 +3 | 74% 67% 86% | 159 156 164 | 32% 43% 19% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.93 0.96 0.87 | 214 235 180 | 14 10 4 | / 16 12 4 / | 6 4 2 | -2 -2 0 | 84% 92% 71% | 135 143 121 | 38% 33% 46% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.77 0.55 1.13 | 162 117 239 | 10 4 6 | / 16 11 5 / | 14 10 4 | -6 -7 +1 | 89% 92% 86% | 111 82 160 | 23% 11% 44% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.47 0.63 0.20 | 149 216 36 | 10 9 1 | / 17 12 5 / | 1 1 0 | -7 -3 -4 | 53% 58% 43% | 99 138 32 | 48% 53% 25% | 2 2 0 | 5 4 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
NAOS
FCY
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
22 | / 15 / | 11 | +7 | |||||||||
|
18 | / 12 / | 5 | +6 | |||||||||
|
15 | / 16 / | 5 | -1 | |||||||||
|
11 | / 18 / | 2 | -7 | |||||||||
|
9 | / 16 / | 7 | -7 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
22 | / 15 / | 3 | +7 | |||||||||
|
20 | / 14 / | 9 | +6 | |||||||||
|
13 | / 16 / | 6 | -3 | |||||||||
|
12 | / 15 / | 9 | -3 | |||||||||
|
10 | / 15 / | 6 | -5 |
It's only the end of Map 1, but I have a good idea of how NAOS operates, and it reminds me of the old TS roster: very strong gameplan at the start, but when the enemy gets a good read on their stats or uses their own stats against them, they just fall apart and feel lost. Hence, the 3 - 9 curse turning into a 13 - 9 win for FCY. Here's to hoping Map 2 will be a better showing.
Finally, someone woke these NAOS guys up. Map 3 can go either way, so I'll accept whoever wins this.
fancy still look so 1 dimensional but wouldnt be surprise if they just win this whole event with their aim alone.
VN so obviously I want Fancy to win but tbh NAOS just have a depth that most VN teams dream of having so NAOS wins 2-1
both and NAOS and FCY are dominant in their regions but might give it to NAOS since they have depth and players w/ international experience
Praying for a map 3
I have exams that finish an hour after bonk v sz
PLZ DELAY
n1zzy goes on demon mode drops 50 annihilates naos and take their souls out of them😈
FCY 2-0 NAOS 😈
okay someone from ph please if naos release some statement about this gameplay let me know, cause wtf is happening broo
what are these comps? is this region that far behind LOL legit looks like both teams all hovered the same agent so it would give them random ones
This is the Valorant content I live for: the desk talking about who lifts weights the most.
Actually not a joke, I like it when the desk just gets to talk about whatever.
https://twitter.com/FaydeVLR/status/1674035049388228610, how is this TOs fault? naos player just completely braindead lol
Regardless why the hell would you let them cook for 3 rounds of hell? That was a pain in the eyes.
Good tourney so far I fall asleep to tech from xerxia game and wake up to tech cause naos thinks ping check lobby lul
idk how lans usually work but is there a ping check before every match? if there is then i could understand why Naos would be confused but if there isn't then lol.
thats why im asking im not sure how lans work. obviously there was a miscom somewhere between naos and the t.o.
naos should just own to their mistakes and give the 3 rounds, they gonna get rolled by fcy anways
Absolute joke from riot. We come on stage at our schedule match time live on stream … but we thought it was practice after our comp clearly isn’t working. Unbelievable.
VCT Pacific statement: Due to a miscommunication between a team and tournament officials, the first 3 rounds before the break were incorrectly assumed to be test rounds. The map will be remade with new picks and restarted from Round 1.
event in Thai, Indo production, officials turnament staff on stage is thai, pinoy team using tagalog..nice GLHF wkwkwk
gave them a whole new comp, no penalties, lobby remake, 9 rounds, and yet still cant win
When it was 9 - 10 already, NAOS should've told the organizers that they thought it was still ping check / test rounds xD
Brother chill with the overhating, have some hope for your region
you can't convince a typical self loathing filipino to have some hope bro
im so excited for this event purely because some of the agent compositions these teams run are absolutely bonkers
fr, SEA has always just been entertaining because of all the different wild comps and playstyles, even more so w SA, OCE, JP and KR here now
fancy comeback faster than my ejaculation bro wtf. NAOS didn't trying to slow tempo down
I'm not even going to blame the crowd if at the end of the match the seats are empty and the only people there are the players and casters. This has been a rough one, can we just call it a day and fix the issues overnight? This kills momentum for the players, the on-site fans are just going to get pissed, and this is just giving whoever's producing this a bad look.
dude this is the biggest annual T2 competition and shit is horrendous as fuck
done commenting cause they won? HAHSHHSHSHSHA tangina ambaho mo pre nagco-comment kada kumikiliti yung bulate sa pwet mo kadiri amputa HAHSHHSHAHAHAHAHHA
Scarz Vs Bonkers match was supposed to start at 2:00 (in EU Time) and now it is 7:00
senyorcarL replace ndg tho. but papichulo has been performing every lan. Lanimal
bro can't believe i stayed awake till 1 AM watching this shit haha.. but papichulo 6 clutches 😯