BYE BYE S0N
SEN
XLG
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.32 1.08 1.61 | 236 191 292 | 19 7 12 | / 13 7 6 / | 9 5 4 | +6 0 +6 | 82% 83% 80% | 142 132 154 | 21% 28% 16% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.27 1.48 1.01 | 278 352 190 | 20 13 7 | / 14 8 6 / | 5 5 0 | +6 +5 +1 | 82% 83% 80% | 180 239 110 | 27% 24% 35% | 8 5 3 | 1 0 1 | +7 +5 +2 | |
|
1.14 1.03 1.26 | 212 151 287 | 16 7 9 | / 12 6 6 / | 7 1 6 | +4 +1 +3 | 82% 92% 70% | 123 87 168 | 30% 26% 31% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.08 0.95 1.24 | 152 155 151 | 13 8 5 | / 11 7 4 / | 13 4 9 | +2 +1 +1 | 64% 50% 80% | 98 104 91 | 24% 40% 11% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.83 0.48 1.25 | 150 122 184 | 11 5 6 | / 15 9 6 / | 3 0 3 | -4 -4 0 | 77% 75% 80% | 110 87 137 | 20% 24% 19% | 0 0 0 | 4 4 0 | -4 -4 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.01 0.98 1.03 | 204 204 204 | 17 8 9 | / 16 7 9 / | 5 3 2 | +1 +1 0 | 77% 80% 75% | 132 144 121 | 37% 50% 27% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.96 0.63 1.24 | 200 146 246 | 13 4 9 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 2 2 | -3 -4 +1 | 55% 50% 58% | 140 108 167 | 20% 21% 19% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.95 0.43 1.39 | 149 90 199 | 12 3 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -5 +3 | 73% 70% 75% | 96 55 129 | 28% 30% 27% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.76 1.00 0.56 | 154 229 91 | 12 8 4 | / 16 8 8 / | 7 3 4 | -4 0 -4 | 68% 90% 50% | 97 150 54 | 33% 35% 30% | 2 1 1 | 4 0 4 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.59 0.49 0.66 | 141 141 142 | 11 5 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 4 1 3 | -6 -3 -3 | 45% 40% 50% | 86 83 90 | 22% 20% 23% | 3 2 1 | 5 4 1 | -2 -2 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.43 1.25 | 232 188 280 | 51 22 29 | / 40 22 18 / | 27 10 17 | +11 0 +11 | 80% 79% 81% | 148 113 187 | 27% 26% 29% | 6 1 5 | 6 2 4 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.94 1.43 1.18 | 217 172 268 | 53 20 33 | / 42 23 19 / | 30 16 14 | +11 -3 +14 | 80% 76% 84% | 132 105 161 | 25% 26% 25% | 9 4 5 | 2 2 0 | +7 +2 +5 | |
|
1.12 1.19 1.15 | 252 262 245 | 57 29 28 | / 46 25 21 / | 14 10 4 | +11 +4 +7 | 78% 71% 87% | 154 169 139 | 31% 32% 29% | 18 10 8 | 8 5 3 | +10 +5 +5 | |
|
0.73 1.12 0.92 | 166 156 176 | 37 19 18 | / 43 26 17 / | 8 1 7 | -6 -7 +1 | 71% 62% 81% | 119 106 133 | 27% 24% 30% | 1 0 1 | 7 6 1 | -6 -6 0 | |
|
0.97 0.70 0.84 | 133 143 124 | 30 18 12 | / 40 20 20 / | 35 14 21 | -10 -2 -8 | 65% 62% 68% | 88 98 78 | 22% 25% 17% | 4 2 2 | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.90 1.52 1.22 | 207 156 251 | 51 18 33 | / 37 20 17 / | 9 2 7 | +14 -2 +16 | 77% 71% 82% | 130 100 158 | 34% 33% 34% | 3 0 3 | 5 3 2 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
1.32 1.03 1.17 | 233 268 200 | 56 30 26 | / 46 23 23 / | 16 10 6 | +10 +7 +3 | 69% 71% 68% | 151 174 131 | 51% 55% 48% | 6 3 3 | 7 4 3 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.45 1.12 0.80 | 167 92 236 | 34 8 26 | / 49 26 23 / | 24 12 12 | -15 -18 +3 | 68% 58% 76% | 112 66 154 | 22% 22% 22% | 5 0 5 | 9 5 4 | -4 -5 +1 | |
|
0.97 0.63 0.79 | 157 205 114 | 34 22 12 | / 47 24 23 / | 25 9 16 | -13 -2 -11 | 71% 77% 65% | 98 125 74 | 24% 30% 17% | 4 2 2 | 9 2 7 | -5 0 -5 | |
|
0.47 0.81 0.65 | 146 151 143 | 36 17 19 | / 49 27 22 / | 6 2 4 | -13 -10 -3 | 62% 65% 59% | 96 95 97 | 29% 34% 25% | 9 5 4 | 8 7 1 | +1 -2 +3 |
SEN
XLG
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.36 1.07 1.73 | 271 233 323 | 20 9 11 | / 16 10 6 / | 8 4 4 | +4 -1 +5 | 76% 67% 89% | 181 141 234 | 36% 29% 43% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.01 1.15 0.83 | 196 218 168 | 15 10 5 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | 67% 58% 78% | 133 138 126 | 29% 24% 35% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.73 0.63 0.86 | 176 151 210 | 13 6 7 | / 18 10 8 / | 8 5 3 | -5 -4 -1 | 76% 67% 89% | 118 94 150 | 30% 25% 35% | 4 2 2 | 1 1 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.66 0.95 0.27 | 109 118 100 | 8 5 3 | / 15 8 7 / | 13 9 4 | -7 -3 -4 | 67% 67% 67% | 68 81 50 | 9% 10% 8% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.56 0.31 0.88 | 189 149 244 | 14 6 8 | / 20 12 8 / | 4 3 1 | -6 -6 0 | 67% 50% 89% | 108 83 142 | 33% 43% 27% | 4 2 2 | 6 4 2 | -2 -2 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.81 2.05 1.64 | 313 331 300 | 25 12 13 | / 10 4 6 / | 3 0 3 | +15 +8 +7 | 90% 78% 100% | 191 207 180 | 45% 41% 48% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.64 1.60 1.68 | 321 349 301 | 25 11 14 | / 14 8 6 / | 4 2 2 | +11 +3 +8 | 71% 67% 75% | 206 207 205 | 66% 71% 63% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.99 1.20 0.83 | 188 214 169 | 13 7 6 | / 15 6 9 / | 12 3 9 | -2 +1 -3 | 81% 78% 83% | 116 125 109 | 17% 25% 11% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.62 0.19 0.93 | 141 48 211 | 11 1 10 | / 16 8 8 / | 9 5 4 | -5 -7 +2 | 76% 56% 92% | 86 35 124 | 25% 14% 29% | 3 0 3 | 6 4 2 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
0.60 0.23 0.88 | 130 111 146 | 11 4 7 | / 15 8 7 / | 1 0 1 | -4 -4 0 | 71% 78% 67% | 94 78 105 | 27% 57% 16% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
SEN
XLG
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.61 1.68 1.56 | 289 288 290 | 23 10 13 | / 12 5 7 / | 5 2 3 | +11 +5 +6 | 86% 80% 92% | 173 188 160 | 33% 42% 27% | 6 3 3 | 1 1 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
1.47 1.16 1.72 | 239 175 293 | 21 7 14 | / 11 6 5 / | 13 6 7 | +10 +1 +9 | 82% 80% 83% | 135 86 176 | 26% 25% 27% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.27 1.17 1.35 | 213 178 243 | 15 6 9 | / 12 6 6 / | 12 5 7 | +3 0 +3 | 82% 80% 83% | 142 112 167 | 17% 21% 14% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.92 0.54 1.24 | 152 124 176 | 11 4 7 | / 12 7 5 / | 1 0 1 | -1 -3 +2 | 68% 50% 83% | 115 90 136 | 35% 24% 47% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.77 1.01 0.57 | 137 158 120 | 9 5 4 | / 14 5 9 / | 9 1 8 | -5 0 -5 | 64% 70% 58% | 99 112 88 | 32% 29% 36% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.93 0.43 1.53 | 158 80 254 | 14 3 11 | / 13 8 5 / | 3 1 2 | +1 -5 +6 | 68% 67% 70% | 107 57 167 | 25% 20% 27% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.88 1.40 0.26 | 175 260 74 | 14 11 3 | / 16 8 8 / | 7 5 2 | -2 +3 -5 | 59% 67% 50% | 118 173 52 | 50% 48% 57% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.81 0.49 1.19 | 159 80 254 | 10 3 7 | / 17 10 7 / | 11 5 6 | -7 -7 0 | 73% 67% 80% | 108 53 173 | 22% 30% 19% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.76 0.63 0.91 | 167 190 141 | 14 8 6 | / 17 11 6 / | 1 1 0 | -3 -3 0 | 68% 75% 60% | 108 118 97 | 40% 33% 57% | 5 3 2 | 2 2 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.64 0.78 0.47 | 130 177 75 | 9 7 2 | / 16 10 6 / | 6 3 3 | -7 -3 -4 | 64% 67% 60% | 82 104 56 | 27% 29% 22% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
Im not gonna cry over a match that my team plays with a sub :)
Probably its common for corny indians who name themselves "valgod23", but definitely not for someone like me. Pretty sure u dropped more tears over my message than I did through my entire existence. sad to realise that
"sit the f down" coming from a guy whose favourite team struggled against a team with coach playing. morrocan flag and "qt" in the end of your name ring a bell that you are johnqt's fan. sad to realise your goat has worse stats than xlg's head coach in this match right? :)
yeah, whatever
however I believe xlg showed a decent game considering they are not playing their main roster (again and again LOL)
yeah, no, they looked pretty miserable
a coach stepping in and outperforming Rarga on every map is laughably bad.
you are correct on hvoya playing better than rarga, rarga been looking disappointing compared to his stats in stage 1.
sen barely looked any better though, dont know if u are fine with your team struggling against coach
even though im a hater, let's be real, this is a sen 2-0, like zero chance xlg even gets to double digits
xlg got unlucky 2 times in masters Toronto and ewc, playing with a sub. crazy shit bro. imagine this shit happening again if they make it to champs
How do people still think Lotus is T sided in the big 2025 just because you don't know how to play CT in ranked?
It was literally by far the most CT sided map at Toronto.
that's why yesterday were like 3 comebacks on Lotus from 10-4 to OT on T side.
Ragebait 10\10.
Happy for your comebacks.
55% defense WR at Toronto still stands. More than any other map in the game.
Ascent at Toronto was actually the third most T sided map, funnily enough (behind Icebox and Pearl), with only 43% defense win rate.
But Ascent was only played 7 times, Lotus 12 times, so the Lotus data is a bit more robust.
Obviously it mostly depends on team comps. Some comps favour defense, others favour attack a bit more, and with meta shifts, the sided-ness of any map can shift pretty drastically.
Out of all 10 tier 1 tournaments this year (Kickoff x4, Bangkok, Stage 1 x4, Toronto), the lowest defense WR was EMEA stage 1 at 44%.
All other tourneys hovered in the 48-52% range.
I picked Toronto because it was the most recent one and reflects the current meta the best, plus was the highest level of play due to being an international tournament, so the data is less skewed by shit teams who just don't know how to play the game.
By and large, teams have figured out how to play defense on this map by fighting for A main or C mound, which mitigates a lot of the inherent advantage that T side seems to have on the surface (it being a 3 site map and all, with easy pivots through Hobbit or C door).
Obviously it depends a lot on team comps and stuff, but the current meta does favour the comps that shine a bit more on defense, so currently it does tend to be more CT sided.
with YOU, yes. but losing to xlg with hvoya is a no-no, considering they should have way less team chemistry than sen
how long is this tech pause, also so many of them; I quit defending ewc, this setup is mickey
bruh why tf their coach is playing...someone get xlg a proper player to fill in for you
they have one but they didnt get him soon enough to be able to bring him to this tournament
Riot's organization is top notch as always. Pauses every game.
They should learn from another indie company, Valve. 0 pauses during a Dota tournament.
The last CS major - also 0 pauses, delays.
What's ur argument? Delays between games there were lower then pauses here during 1 map :D
So, you admit there were delays then. That makes your statement "0 pauses, delays" grammatically and logically false. But that's boring so let's dig in with the insults and nonsense then, shall we?
Yes, ofc, i do admit we've got delays betwenn games, as in any disciplin. Common 10-20 min delays to let guys make their setup comfortable. There was't 1-2 hours TECHNICAL delays or 1-2 hours pauses during one map. Can't u just admit it?
val isn't organizing this, although agreed the entire thing being online and not lan is sad
This is already an embaressing result from s0n, losing 1 map to a cn team with a coach
Last two rounds entirely carried by hpw and viva on 2v4 and 2v3 clutches is crazy
sen lost to a cn team with their coach playing and their main duelist sleeping AND this team has come from Ascension with 0 international exp
CN team with a coach subbed in does better than america best team also playing with coach in
blg is not that bad of a team, considering their performance against prx. both g2 and xlg tried their best against sen and blg, which are both solid teams
In the last 8 matches. Sen only won 4 and all of them are against Chinese teams.
So embarrassing constantly calling tech pauses to break the momentum, and then they nearly lose anyway, even though XLG is playing with their coach. NA might honestly be the worst region.
Go first find a good 5th player after that cry about it and tech pause were org fault not the team and how long you are gonna use the same excuse of not having 5th player for xlg loss
Are you stupid? They do have a fifth player he just couldn't travel. And the tech pauses were from Sentinels they even confirmed it on X.
Fifth player couldn't travel bruh 😂 . And accusing sentinels like they were in very big lead like 9-3 or 10-2 all I see is sentinels back to back 5-6 wins.
Bro, how dumb can you be? I was complaining about the tech pauses breaking the momentum. And wow SEN can only win against Chinese teams, and even that just barely, which doesn’t exactly speak well for their performance. Especially considering XLG had to play with their coach, and it was still a close game.
You are clearly hating sen even if they win Blg also almost lost to g2 with their coach playing.
So you're saying BLG isn't good just because they almost lost to G2, even though they had their coach playing? Interesting. But when it comes to SEN, that doesn't apply, huh? Haha.
Not good as Sen and how much you hate sen is still the top 5 best teams and has 2 master trophies.G2 with leaf would have destroyed blg easily.
I never said anything against that. I know they've won two Masters tournaments. But that was with a different roster. Their current performance with this roster just doesn't look good. And right now, they are definitely not a Top 5 team.
Why don't you read your comment yourself first (So embarrassing constantly calling tech pauses to break the momentum, and then they nearly lose anyway, even though XLG is playing with their coach. NA might honestly be the worst region.)
What a tech mess, but good for SEN to close it out in the end. zekken more and more shows he's the best Neon.
XLG still clutched some crazy rounds with coach. happywei and Viva are shooters. Rarga sadly again with the communication issues... xD At this point with all the Jemkins, Rargas and vo0kashus we might see a all Russian team again at some point... under Chinese flag... xD
Nah it's actually genius, depending on the buy he's a drone that has a cam and 150 health and it sometimes even shoots back. The drawback is you play one man down 70% of the rounds
With how many tech pauses happened during SEN's matches, it can be assumed that they're cheating by abusing it.
I never understood how xi lai gaming got so shit if they just lost one player that wasn't even close of being their best player or most impactful one. Did Rarga lost the will to play because the YOU player is out?