mibr 2-0 on sentinels
cope for toronto qual <3
MIBR
SEN
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.08 1.40 0.86 | 199 200 199 | 16 7 9 | / 15 4 11 / | 0 0 0 | +1 +3 -2 | 60% 75% 50% | 126 136 119 | 56% 67% 50% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.07 0.58 1.39 | 191 79 267 | 13 2 11 | / 13 5 8 / | 4 4 0 | 0 -3 +3 | 55% 63% 50% | 134 64 181 | 52% 29% 60% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.85 0.73 0.93 | 146 142 150 | 10 4 6 | / 14 5 9 / | 3 2 1 | -4 -1 -3 | 65% 75% 58% | 93 75 105 | 35% 20% 44% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.64 1.13 0.31 | 182 297 105 | 11 8 3 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 2 1 | -6 +1 -7 | 60% 75% 50% | 128 207 76 | 25% 28% 20% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.52 0.76 0.36 | 134 177 106 | 7 4 3 | / 16 6 10 / | 9 2 7 | -9 -2 -7 | 55% 50% 58% | 89 105 78 | 24% 25% 23% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.57 1.58 1.54 | 211 209 214 | 15 9 6 | / 7 4 3 / | 13 10 3 | +8 +5 +3 | 95% 100% 88% | 146 126 177 | 44% 45% 43% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.52 1.85 1.03 | 346 430 222 | 25 19 6 | / 13 7 6 / | 3 1 2 | +12 +12 0 | 70% 75% 63% | 209 244 157 | 26% 30% 17% | 7 6 1 | 3 1 2 | +4 +5 -1 | |
|
1.09 1.03 1.18 | 158 123 210 | 11 5 6 | / 10 5 5 / | 6 3 3 | +1 0 +1 | 95% 92% 100% | 102 85 127 | 23% 36% 16% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.95 0.98 0.91 | 194 227 145 | 16 11 5 | / 13 8 5 / | 4 2 2 | +3 +3 0 | 60% 58% 63% | 116 133 91 | 39% 36% 50% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.58 0.51 0.68 | 112 98 133 | 8 4 4 | / 14 8 6 / | 5 4 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 60% 42% 88% | 68 67 71 | 24% 20% 28% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.97 1.17 1.08 | 174 166 187 | 27 11 16 | / 29 13 16 / | 10 5 5 | -2 -2 0 | 68% 65% 71% | 124 113 133 | 27% 17% 36% | 1 0 1 | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.15 1.01 1.07 | 200 185 212 | 35 16 19 | / 31 13 18 / | 4 1 3 | +4 +3 +1 | 66% 70% 63% | 134 124 141 | 38% 37% 38% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.99 0.92 | 215 228 210 | 34 16 18 | / 36 18 18 / | 8 3 5 | -2 -2 0 | 66% 65% 67% | 147 157 138 | 21% 25% 18% | 10 5 5 | 8 5 3 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.49 1.18 0.87 | 172 90 236 | 26 6 20 | / 33 15 18 / | 17 7 10 | -7 -9 +2 | 59% 50% 67% | 112 57 157 | 32% 18% 38% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.63 0.51 0.56 | 129 159 103 | 16 10 6 | / 35 18 17 / | 21 7 14 | -19 -8 -11 | 64% 60% 67% | 84 92 78 | 19% 18% 20% | 3 3 0 | 6 3 3 | -3 0 -3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 1.45 1.49 | 313 349 265 | 49 30 19 | / 27 16 11 / | 9 4 5 | +22 +14 +8 | 70% 71% 70% | 186 198 172 | 28% 32% 23% | 12 9 3 | 7 4 3 | +5 +5 0 | |
|
1.15 1.41 1.27 | 204 184 227 | 32 16 16 | / 23 14 9 / | 20 13 7 | +9 +2 +7 | 86% 92% 80% | 132 109 160 | 32% 32% 31% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.86 1.47 1.13 | 218 184 262 | 36 16 20 | / 28 17 11 / | 20 9 11 | +8 -1 +9 | 66% 58% 75% | 133 109 161 | 36% 39% 33% | 7 4 3 | 4 2 2 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.11 1.16 1.13 | 200 186 225 | 33 16 17 | / 27 14 13 / | 16 9 7 | +6 +2 +4 | 84% 83% 85% | 125 119 131 | 20% 24% 16% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.51 0.44 0.48 | 102 111 88 | 14 9 5 | / 33 18 15 / | 14 6 8 | -19 -9 -10 | 66% 54% 80% | 68 75 60 | 34% 42% 26% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 |
MIBR
SEN
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.28 1.14 1.42 | 202 181 224 | 17 7 10 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 3 4 | +2 -1 +3 | 71% 58% 83% | 149 138 160 | 23% 16% 31% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.15 0.64 1.66 | 248 182 315 | 23 8 15 | / 19 11 8 / | 5 1 4 | +4 -3 +7 | 71% 58% 83% | 163 124 201 | 18% 21% 17% | 8 4 4 | 5 4 1 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.07 0.99 1.16 | 200 176 225 | 19 9 10 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 1 3 | +3 0 +3 | 71% 67% 75% | 140 117 163 | 28% 24% 31% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.70 0.43 0.98 | 152 98 206 | 13 4 9 | / 20 10 10 / | 13 3 10 | -7 -6 -1 | 63% 42% 83% | 94 53 134 | 20% 13% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.60 0.54 0.66 | 124 148 101 | 9 6 3 | / 19 12 7 / | 12 5 7 | -10 -6 -4 | 71% 67% 75% | 81 84 77 | 15% 12% 18% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.46 1.19 1.73 | 280 267 294 | 24 11 13 | / 14 9 5 / | 6 3 3 | +10 +2 +8 | 71% 67% 75% | 167 152 183 | 30% 34% 27% | 5 3 2 | 4 3 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.29 0.74 1.84 | 241 142 341 | 20 5 15 | / 15 9 6 / | 16 7 9 | +5 -4 +9 | 71% 58% 83% | 146 85 208 | 34% 44% 30% | 4 2 2 | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.17 1.19 1.15 | 241 249 234 | 22 11 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 10 6 4 | +5 +2 +3 | 75% 75% 75% | 144 153 134 | 18% 19% 17% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.02 0.72 1.32 | 197 159 235 | 17 7 10 | / 16 10 6 / | 7 3 4 | +1 -3 +4 | 79% 83% 75% | 121 92 150 | 22% 19% 24% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.39 0.51 0.27 | 91 125 57 | 6 5 1 | / 19 10 9 / | 9 2 7 | -13 -5 -8 | 71% 67% 75% | 68 83 52 | 50% 73% 22% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
im happier for sen winning. i just said mibr win cuz it was already cope enough for me to have sen beating g2. Still happy both teams made it tho, verno my goat
cant delete messages on VLR
and im not humiliated, since i didnt need to change my prediction.
earlier last year in champs it took me 5 tries to predict a match, and in NA ascension 5 times as well
didnt get a single one right. and im still not humiliated because its a prediction
u think MIBR is winning against sen?😂mibr couldnt even beat G2, they aint even touching sen, goodluck and 14-12? no map is gonna get so close, sen are gonna dominate mibr, mark my words
SEN shit on EG and EG 2-0 KRU 2 times in the same split.
ur statement has 0 logic ( so does the other guy )
I think he just Said it to point the invonsistency on the logic of the othere guy
SEN won against MIBR 2-0 whats ur point? G2 almost lost to even EG whats your point?🤡 and I said SEN are gonna dominate MIBR, and they did, the match was not even 10% as close as the scores show🤡
MIBR stronger than current SEN? nice joke😂Made in brazil❌ Made with noobs✅ fkin noobs got dominated by SEN.
This is literally a 50-50 match. Both teams ban Fracture, the team that starts banning a map will win the game.
SEN aint banning fracture now, Johnqt said they are keeping it as ace, and no better way to use ace than win upperfinals and gain veto advantage in grandfinals to skip swiss stage in toronto
Exactly Sen will ban ice box and mibr might ban haven or ascent the sen pick haven or ascent whatever is open and mibr will pick lotus or split then Sen will ban either lotus or split whatever is open and mibr will ban fracture leaving pearl as decided
mibr 2-1 sen
impossible to sen win against mibr on icebox playing without harbor.
sen will smash mibr on ascent
mibr wins on split
SEN 1-2 MIBR
sen take ascent
mibr smash on icebox
pearl finale, mibr win in ot
SEN ban Fracture, MIBR ban Ascent, SEN pick Haven, MIBR pick Icebox, SEN ban Lotus, MIBR ban Pearl, Split Remains
SEN win Haven 13-9
MIBR win Icebox 13-7
SEN win Split 16-14
SEN win 2-1
i think it gonna be closer, cant believe in 13-9 and 13-7. maybe 13-11 or 14-12 and 13-11 or 13-10
dude sen will ban icebox (if they dont ban icebox gg mibr icebox they cant beat) , mibr ban ascent/haven , sen pick haven/ascent , mibr pick lotus (since sen is 0-2 on lotus currently), sen ban split mibr ban fracture , pearl decider
SEN ban Lotus
MIBR ban fracture
SEN pick Pearl
MIBR pick Icebox
SEN ban Ascent
MIBR ban Split
Haven remains
2x1 either way
In the SEN G2 game, when both teams practically perma-banned Fracture, SEN was the one who ended up banning it, so I don't see why it would be different here. I'd say SEN picking Pearl makes sense, or Haven both have a 50/50 chance of getting picked, SEN banning Ascent makes 0 sense, though? MIBR has a 0% win rate on that map, losing to Furia and G2, while SEN has a 100% win rate. MIBR banning Split also doesn't make much sense over Haven because SEN have a 75% win rate on Haven and MIBR have a 67% win rate on it, while on Split, SEN have a 67% win rate and MIBR have a 100%.
I do agree that it will be a 2-1 either way.
Close game. Sentinels is a prety good team, but for me, feels inconsistent. I think MiBR is a better team currentily, and I support them, so....
MiBR 2-1 SEN
#MiBRJoga
This is a hot take but Sen 2-0 Mibr
I don't hate em but 13-0 on one map and I hope they break map length record again
What makes you think that? Is it rational or just a wish?
Not hating btw I'm just curious
watch sentinels choke hard to MIBR, they will get too complacent from beating G2
i don't think SEN is gonna complacent as this match is a must win for them, for map ban advantage as well as qualification in EWC.
did you see how arrogant sentinels got after their 11-2 lead against G2 on ascent. They would have choked so hard against G2. the way they play in big lead situations is actually very horrible and concerning. I cannot imagine a world where sen will catch up to mibr
The only thing here is how about not judge other teams about their inconsistency and you might as well judge your team
GODS MIBR
VERNO GOD-LIKE MACHINE
PACK OF GREEK GODS
ASPASES
VERNUS
CORTEZIUS
XENOMES
ARTZINUS
THUNDER OF GODS
MIBR 2-0 SEN
LET THE STORM BEGIN
imo..its a close matchup but sen will come through:
SEN 2-1 MIBR
13-9 10-13 13-11
I am kind of afraid of this match's result. Gringos are putting MIBR as the winner, and that is never a good sign
Mibr vai pipocar cai pro lower, EG vai ganhar da G2, mete pau no mibr e por ganhar da Sentinels indo como mabaken para os masters
wtf are these tech pauses
mafia trying to change the script or what xd
end this clownfiesta faster
paid actors are tired 🙂↕️
They fkn replaced EMEA gear with americas gear and america have old emea tech pause fiesta rn xD
That win against G2 awakened something in Sentinels — that confidence is dangerous. Jinx maybe
every round when mibr have advantage they keep play aggressive to peek, try to catch timing then throw the round.
scripted as always
SEN had to sell all handicaps and scam more bettors on their map pick
how people still believe these games are legit in 2025 💀💀💀
Aspas needs to learn Yoru, every good team knows how to play him. TH/T1/G2/ ETC all the top teams in the world are playing him for a reason.
this region is a joke, suddenly mibr doesn't know how to play the game. how are people supposed to take this region seriously when sentiluls is one of their representatives? people know sentiluls is not going to do much and be the first one eliminated
NOTICE HOW ZEKKEN WENT BACK TO HIS PRIME TIME MOUSEPAD(ARTISAN) INSTEAD OF USING A SPONSORED RAZER STRIDER MOUSEPAD AND STARTED TO DOMINATE AGAIN.