https://x.com/florscnt/status/1923797866344075396
there's hope she isn't a terrible person
It's for sure strange.
She's going to lawyer up and deal with this legally to avoid saying the wrong things? That sounds like she did something. Innocent people have nothing to hide. If a girl accused me of SA right now I'd laugh and deny it at the top of my voice because I know I've never done that.
I should've rephrased what I meant. Getting a lawyer is the correct thing to do, her initial response is just wishy-washy.
She says she strongly denies accusations of SA. What does that actually mean? She might just not believe what happened was SA. The question is did that stuff happen tho? At which point, it doesn't matter what she thinks it was. It's a very safe answer, yeah, but it also makes it a bit suspect.
I don't know. We aren't going to get clear answers until either side actually gives evidence anyways.
Then you are going to face charges for slander because she wasn't "completely" lying. Maybe she didn't get SA'ed, but she did took the uber home that day? Sounds ridiculous but a good prosecutor can use your initial response to muddy the details and take the case absolutely nowhere. "Your honor, my client might have been lying, but the offender's response hurt her feelings and led to trauma!". I've seen this happen in court so many times. Its a little gross but it can happen, so its better to play safe and issue out the "legally correct" response. Hope this helps
even if it's not true and you know it isn't you would probably want to sue for defamation. PR response is always correct even if you didn't do it cuz either way someone could be in legal trouble.
also cuz shooting yourself in the foot is just dumb and you want to avoid that all costs especially if you're innocent.
That’s generally not true.
It’s fine to share facts, things that will show up in discovery, pre-trial. Things like DMs (assuming they’re not doctored).
I generally advise not giving any testimony or recounting of events without having it vetted by an attorney. Opposing counsel with often try to twist your words, and if you’re not careful with specific wording, they might lead a jury to read something that didn’t happen into your words.
Security camera. GPS data says she wasn’t home at the night in question, etc…
There’s many things that could be examples. The likely case is that she has evidence that at best calls into question whether or not there was an expectation of sex when the girl came to Flor’s house. (Would be my guess at least) which, while it doesn’t necessarily preclude a finding of sexual assault, it would be pretty strong evidence
I don't disagree but it's not like the accuser didn't basically imply the same.
It's still kinda important to be careful cuz people interpret shit wrong and run away with it regardless, look what happened with the scrim sharing drama after frost no fist bump, people just hallucinated shit from nothing. Always pays to be careful.
The accuser provided a timeline of events, and claims that can be proven/disproven. Flor has stated that it didnt happen, she has evidence that it didnt happen, but doesn’t want to share it for”safety reasons”.
This doesn’t mean that what the accuser has said are facts, they’re still only allegations, but I don’t really see them as the same.
Edit: to be precise, Flor doesn’t claim sex didn’t happen, but that she has evidence that it was consensual
Yoo! That's a good point, the fact the accuser gave a date means evidence around that specific day is huge. She also talked about calling her mother and taking an uber.
All of these events will have receipts or some type of witness, if not at least picked up by nearby cameras and GPS tracking. It won't mean SA took place but it means the accuser can be proven (or disproven) to have visited Flor that day. Anything else comes down to word of mouth.
What strikes me is Flor didn't deny the events, just that it was SA. This is very PR but like people are saying, it might be the best answer a person can give if they aren't 100% clean.
While it is tragic that the first trans player to cross into vct proper is like this I hope it doesn't lead to people being even more transphobic.
I'm of the opinion that we should pretty much believe these victims because what exactly does flor even have to lose she already retired its not like this victim is taking them down at the heigh of their popularity (top GC runs)
I think there is a chance of her not being a Rapist, of her not being a terrible person however with this seems harder to believe https://x.com/Miho45TangTang/status/1923743358897328373 Unless it's fake ofc