Who would win, tier 2 EU teams eg(case, mouz, wave) or tier 2 NA eg (t1, akrew, 100t, tsm acad)
Who would win, tier 2 EU teams eg(case, mouz, wave) or tier 2 NA eg (t1, akrew, 100t, tsm acad)
is tier 2 EU all the teams in the VRL? and what counts as tier 2 in NA because i would say that 100T isn't quite tier 2 NA according to my standards.
@bananabread: Trying to find people with an iq below room temp
u found the first one already.
I guess if you consider all teams in EMEA Vct tier 1, then all NA teams in vct have to be considered tier 1 too
If not what do we consider tier 1, playoffs? Is Acend tier 2
i thought that tier 1 EU and NA were all the teams in the group stages.
Teams in playoffs tier 1
Teams in groups tier1.5
Teams that out from groups to EMEA promotion tier 2(2 teams with 0-5)
if he puts tsm acad as tier 2, does that mean he considers tsm tier 1? π
the acad>main joke is long dead, so much roster turnover and result difference since.
I hate to break it to you but mouz isn't beating C9 or Optic when they're fired up. They'd probably beat LG or Knights though.
you are right though i think for LG/Knights vs mouz/XL/Rebels i think its more 50/50, it might go either way
i see T1 as the teams that made it to playoffs in NA while nrg 100t eg rise are all T2 imo. in that case i think the tier 2 NA teams will win against the VRL teams. but if you count teams that made groups in EMEA like navi and ldn utd they would beat T2 NA
navi and ldn utd would beat knights, lg, sentinels, xset, mb even v1.
I STILL THINK OPTIC IS BETTER THAN V1
Its not too far off, obviously hard to tell. Considering that M3C is in same group with them who are arguably best in the world and then you have both FPX and TL who are pretty comparable to top NA teams (Guard, V1, Optic, C9). So LDN UTD and NaVi are pretty comparable to SEN and XSET.
No see Optic isn't nearly as consistent as V1 but they have moments of pure excellence. Take their game against V1 (for example), they POUNDED on Bind. 13-2 for fucks sake. Then on Haven and Icebox they got 13-5'd twice. That's the lacking consistency, and a main reason why I think they shouldn't go to masters because they're super unreliable.
There is no way ur saying Case, mouz and wave are t2. You really have no clue about the EU scene
You really think NA tier 2 teams would stand a chance against bonkar using just a very small fraction of his power? not a chance
i think eu is way better in tier 1 but the tier 2 there is far behind tier 1 teams
in na tier 2 teams are much closer to the level of tier 1 na teams and often put up a good number of rounds ro upset them
na tier 2 better than eu tier 2
na tier 1 worse than eu tier 1
SOME t2 eu teams could beat SOME t1 na teams, but it depends on the teams. There's a huge disparity between t1 eu and t2 eu
I think the fact that 100T ignored ec1s igling shows that NA is all tier 2 and tier 2 NA is just tier 3 valorant