we will do vlr#1 in every year
2021: nats
2022: yay
2023: alfajer
2024: texture
2025: kaajak
vlr awards
posted in
Valorant Discussion
I mean you can do a solid case for Alfajer Leo and demon1 I wouldnt mind if any one of them is the best player of 2023
love kaajak and all but not winning a trophy isn’t a good look as the only outlier on this list
i dont see any other possible contenders other than alfa and kaajak, or maybe even meteor
f0rsaken. you might hate him but he is def in contention for best player in 2025 if not the winner.
how did u get meteor for 2025 😭
Yeah he could be in the contention but personally idk
Kaajak was insane plus he was a rookie
im sorry but forsaken wasn't even the best player on prx and never had pop-off perfomances. i might be a bit biased but he was always a middle of the pack player in tournaments.
we are talking 2025 here? unless smth happened to ur eyes, he was by far prx best player in 2025
who was prx best player at kickoff? f0rsaken
did kaajak qualify for bangkok? no
he played horrendous at champs? wait he just played to a normal standard
Normal to his standard lmao, far below kaajak’s standard. Also yeah basically the conversation is forsaken’s one good event vs Kaajak’s two good events. There isn’t any world where you can look at the two and say forsaken is better
i think u have some misconception that kaajak performed insanely good at toronto or smth when he played at the level of f0rsaken at champs. it was alfajer in toronto.
kaajak was great, but f0rsaken was flexing,igling and he won a trophy. kaajak was just playing duelist and he didn’t win despite his great performances
The only misconception is that you think forsaken was anymore than an average to below average player at champs
flexing is good but he wasn't the best at anything, kaajak was the best at every agents he played
it wasnt that he was by far the best it was just the first time he wasnt mid on average, classic flukerx flair take
he was by far the best in 2025 because he was the most consistent.
everyone played average or horribly in kickoff except f0rsaken.
f0rsaken was flexing while igling(say what u want about the team calling rn but back then, he was named as the clear caller) and led prx to toronto win
something heated up alot in stage2 but he wasn’t doing that great at start of the year.
f0rsaken declined by champs but it wasn’t like he was dropping stinkers. he just played above average
lol yes, this dude is just saying random stuff and hoping we don’t fact check it
im not saying random stuff. you guys just have some hate against f0rsaken. he was good in 2025. why u acting like he was horrible for that year from the bias u have from other years
If we’re talking purely about consistent, it’s objectively kaajak. You can look at the stats, kaajak was more consistent than forsaken. Trent was also more consistent.
did u read the chain of events of the comments?
The guy said f0rsaken wasn’t prx best player which made no sense in 2025. I responded by saying he was and u confused it with me saying he was more consistent than kaajak.
did u not read???
My argument for f0rsaken > kaajak is that he flexed, igled, and won
flexed: was forsaken the best at any agents?
igled: bro forsaken shared that work with his teammates it def dont matter
that's so weird no statspas no bumnicle no cheathan i thought they were the goats :((
Its almost like they were shit(relatively) every year of play
ok they've never been shit this is a horrible take 😭
they've just never been the best itw for lengthy periods of time (i could see an argument for aspas for certain periods of time tho)
shit(relatively)
Relatively compared to the true peaks doesn't mean they're bad, they're overshadowed
alright so when you use the word relatively you typically have to specify what exactly you're comparing them relative to
you still haven't done that
relative compared to their "true peaks?" then every player's average performance over a large enough sample size is shit if you're comparing them to their peaks
this makes no sense, so i can't believe this is what you mean
doesn't mean they're bad, they're overshadowed
...by their own peaks?
you don't compare a goat candidate's performance to what they could be performing like, you just look at how they have been performing
ur claim makes no sense there is no world where any of these players are "shit" relative to any metric except maybe how vlr treats them
Nvm..
Let me clarify one more time
Compared to the considered "best of the year" Peaked players. They're shit relative to them
Never knew this got so offensive
Discord