Proof that VLR is full of dumbasses when basically all of you talked shit and said stuff like XLG is a free win and China should lose international spots. Where are all of you dumbasses now?
Proof that VLR is full of dumbasses when basically all of you talked shit and said stuff like XLG is a free win and China should lose international spots. Where are all of you dumbasses now?
wont even give XLG their flowers. always GE/pacific is throwing instead of China did good
You can chalk it up to throwing all you want, but that's just an excuse that weak teams use.
can't forget how quickly people devolved into saying EDG winning champs was a fluke after they lost ONE series in kickoff
that + ppl switch up like crazy on this site. the amount of APAC flairs suddenly turning heel and trying to claim XLG's win shows how shameless ppl on this site are
yup xlg did so well ge suddenly forgot how to read, can't believe i was watching the same team that avoided primmie for two whole maps during attack.
U can tell when vlr on certain timezone, posts about international spots would come up.
Both teams were awful....XLG had better luck in the draw, both they and Global lost against FUT or NRG.
You don't get it. GE is a much higher ceiling team than xlg ever showed in this tournament. Simply looking at the LEV or FS game is enough to know that. They just couldn't bring it out today, probably cuz of XLG being their scrim partner and they mightve overcooked some stuff. Deserved win for XLG but GE would've been a better team to be in the playoffs for sure. XLG will be blown out of the water by a more pricipled team, whereas GE has the strats and shooters to punch above their weight sometimes.
yeah, losing to the same breeze attack round back to back multiple rounds in a row is inexcusable but the team that only has one breeze attack round isn't making it deeper in the event either. This is kinda lose-lose.
Happywei and Rarga have better mechanics than anyone in GE imo, but as a team I can see GE being slightly better.
Also, XLG could've definitely made it closer against NRG, but Keiko decided to have a life game, honestly hella unfortunate for them.
I dont think China should loose their spot, but I start to think we should redraw the APAC-CN boundary. APAC is too big and China too small, maybe Eastern Asia T1 should be a thing and the rest of APAC with maybe MENA should be the other T1
China accounts for 30% of all of Asia's population, and have some of the highest revenue in Valorant they definitely aren't too small. Also there are way too many logistical complications in China not being its own region.
Exactly, 30% of Asia population, not 50% this is the problem (And seems the data are kinda overestimate), if they share one tier 1 with Japan and Korea you can have a balanced population boundaries.
The problem with trying to expand China is that:
Not going to happen, China will never ever lose their own region it's a pointless discussion
Never is never sure, China have a terrible demographic change in the 10 next year (especially since population number in China have something fishy in it), they are probably safe for the next 8 year, but it's hard to predict what the scene will look like in 10 years, when India will have twice their population (and maybe even x3) and start to gap close China GDP, this is a long term talk
I actually think XLG played pretty well today, I liked some of their stuff on Breeze, they actually played with sum balls unlike usually. Don't change that I think they will go 0-2 in playoffs but whatever
I think XLG is a pretty good team, but they're facing off against teams that are like 1-2 tiers above them. Hopefully they can pull of an upset.
i for one always believed that cn was not totally cooked at this tournament, xlg have a lotus that on their day is one of the best itw and edg i assume will be strong, at least better than most of the swiss teams
I was in this boat, but based on the past 2-3 internationals it was a conversation that may have had to happen based on day 1 results. Obviously now that swiss is over this is not the case.