Ez for PRX 🌊
PRX
GE
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.32 1.33 | 268 274 263 | 23 11 12 | / 14 6 8 / | 1 1 0 | +9 +5 +4 | 78% 91% 67% | 172 168 175 | 29% 22% 38% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.19 0.79 1.55 | 210 151 265 | 17 6 11 | / 14 8 6 / | 3 1 2 | +3 -2 +5 | 83% 91% 75% | 149 101 193 | 27% 21% 30% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.09 1.51 0.70 | 264 330 204 | 20 12 8 | / 17 7 10 / | 10 8 2 | +3 +5 -2 | 74% 91% 58% | 176 221 134 | 42% 38% 50% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.84 0.84 0.83 | 191 192 191 | 16 8 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 0 3 | -1 0 -1 | 65% 55% 75% | 128 137 120 | 36% 41% 31% | 3 1 2 | 5 2 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.77 0.86 0.69 | 150 133 167 | 12 5 7 | / 15 5 10 / | 4 2 2 | -3 0 -3 | 78% 82% 75% | 104 83 124 | 41% 71% 30% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.08 1.24 0.91 | 239 250 227 | 20 11 9 | / 18 9 9 / | 3 2 1 | +2 +2 0 | 78% 83% 73% | 164 183 142 | 43% 57% 31% | 6 3 3 | 2 1 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.95 0.71 1.21 | 169 153 187 | 14 7 7 | / 16 9 7 / | 6 4 2 | -2 -2 0 | 74% 75% 73% | 120 105 136 | 39% 54% 30% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.91 0.71 1.13 | 188 157 223 | 15 7 8 | / 19 10 9 / | 4 1 3 | -4 -3 -1 | 65% 67% 64% | 125 110 141 | 20% 20% 20% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.88 1.01 0.73 | 171 212 127 | 13 9 4 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 1 2 | -4 0 -4 | 70% 83% 55% | 126 143 108 | 17% 21% 13% | 4 4 0 | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | |
|
0.87 1.15 0.57 | 186 222 149 | 15 9 6 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 4 0 | -3 0 -3 | 57% 75% 36% | 125 150 97 | 50% 63% 30% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.12 0.98 1.04 | 228 243 227 | 49 22 27 | / 50 21 29 / | 31 16 15 | -1 +1 -2 | 75% 82% 69% | 151 162 143 | 35% 42% 28% | 4 1 3 | 6 2 4 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.83 1.16 1.00 | 206 181 233 | 51 19 32 | / 45 20 25 / | 3 2 1 | +6 -1 +7 | 66% 68% 64% | 143 115 165 | 22% 16% 27% | 6 3 3 | 6 4 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.92 1.04 0.98 | 198 197 205 | 45 19 26 | / 48 22 26 / | 12 5 7 | -3 -3 0 | 66% 64% 67% | 134 134 134 | 27% 36% 20% | 8 3 5 | 11 4 7 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.87 1.08 0.98 | 190 198 190 | 44 20 24 | / 44 22 22 / | 10 3 7 | 0 -2 +2 | 70% 71% 69% | 128 121 134 | 31% 31% 30% | 3 2 1 | 4 1 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.81 0.87 0.84 | 179 152 194 | 39 15 24 | / 48 19 29 / | 11 4 7 | -9 -4 -5 | 73% 71% 75% | 111 92 127 | 37% 35% 38% | 10 4 6 | 6 4 2 | +4 0 +4 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.02 1.22 | 250 283 205 | 59 39 20 | / 44 25 19 / | 15 6 9 | +15 +14 +1 | 84% 83% 86% | 160 177 139 | 32% 47% 19% | 13 9 4 | 7 4 3 | +6 +5 +1 | |
|
0.90 1.08 0.98 | 209 205 216 | 47 25 22 | / 47 27 20 / | 10 5 5 | 0 -2 +2 | 75% 78% 71% | 144 146 140 | 28% 30% 27% | 7 5 2 | 4 2 2 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.87 1.12 0.98 | 190 173 205 | 43 23 20 | / 46 26 20 / | 23 13 10 | -3 -3 0 | 80% 83% 75% | 124 116 133 | 24% 26% 23% | 3 0 3 | 4 3 1 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.90 1.08 0.98 | 210 186 234 | 49 25 24 | / 47 28 19 / | 9 9 0 | +2 -3 +5 | 66% 67% 64% | 126 112 145 | 31% 41% 22% | 8 3 5 | 9 4 5 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.70 1.05 0.85 | 156 145 175 | 37 19 18 | / 44 27 17 / | 10 5 5 | -7 -8 +1 | 72% 69% 75% | 112 103 123 | 24% 19% 31% | 2 1 1 | 7 5 2 | -5 -4 -1 |
PRX
GE
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.13 1.34 1.02 | 227 274 204 | 14 6 8 | / 14 5 9 / | 3 1 2 | 0 +1 -1 | 72% 83% 67% | 130 142 124 | 52% 31% 75% | 5 2 3 | 1 0 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.84 0.03 1.27 | 162 40 224 | 10 0 10 | / 15 6 9 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -6 +1 | 50% 17% 67% | 108 40 142 | 13% 0% 16% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.72 0.02 1.14 | 160 53 214 | 11 1 10 | / 14 6 8 / | 1 1 0 | -3 -5 +2 | 61% 50% 67% | 121 33 165 | 17% 0% 22% | 1 0 1 | 3 3 0 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.62 0.44 0.71 | 159 153 163 | 9 3 6 | / 17 6 11 / | 8 1 7 | -8 -3 -5 | 61% 67% 58% | 92 87 94 | 17% 75% 9% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.57 0.32 0.69 | 152 140 158 | 9 3 6 | / 15 6 9 / | 2 0 2 | -6 -3 -3 | 50% 33% 58% | 92 77 100 | 29% 29% 29% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.01 1.99 | 257 210 352 | 18 10 8 | / 11 9 2 / | 3 3 0 | +7 +1 +6 | 83% 83% 83% | 157 115 241 | 17% 27% 5% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.31 1.25 1.43 | 269 278 254 | 18 13 5 | / 11 8 3 / | 6 2 4 | +7 +5 +2 | 94% 92% 100% | 162 160 167 | 25% 41% 12% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.22 1.16 1.34 | 232 233 231 | 15 10 5 | / 12 8 4 / | 6 5 1 | +3 +2 +1 | 94% 100% 83% | 149 150 147 | 17% 16% 18% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.12 0.82 1.71 | 211 174 288 | 15 7 8 | / 11 8 3 / | 4 3 1 | +4 -1 +5 | 78% 67% 100% | 144 129 174 | 26% 29% 24% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.92 0.78 1.19 | 133 137 126 | 9 6 3 | / 8 7 1 / | 4 2 2 | +1 -1 +2 | 78% 67% 100% | 98 105 82 | 19% 17% 25% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 |
PRX
GE
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.31 1.09 1.51 | 262 206 314 | 20 7 13 | / 16 8 8 / | 13 7 6 | +4 -1 +5 | 87% 82% 92% | 174 145 200 | 40% 43% 38% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.24 1.47 1.03 | 241 287 200 | 19 11 8 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 4 1 | +3 +3 0 | 78% 100% 58% | 159 182 138 | 30% 41% 17% | 3 2 1 | 3 1 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.11 1.24 0.98 | 209 276 148 | 18 11 7 | / 15 8 7 / | 5 2 3 | +3 +3 0 | 74% 73% 75% | 136 165 109 | 36% 39% 32% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.90 0.77 1.01 | 191 159 222 | 17 7 10 | / 17 8 9 / | 1 0 1 | 0 -1 +1 | 57% 55% 58% | 131 106 153 | 21% 17% 25% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.69 0.46 0.89 | 160 105 211 | 13 4 9 | / 19 9 10 / | 4 1 3 | -6 -5 -1 | 70% 55% 83% | 104 72 133 | 23% 18% 25% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 1.64 0.91 | 242 322 156 | 21 15 6 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 2 4 | +6 +7 -1 | 83% 75% 91% | 155 186 121 | 30% 44% 14% | 4 4 0 | 3 2 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.97 0.87 1.08 | 246 228 266 | 19 9 10 | / 19 10 9 / | 3 1 2 | 0 -1 +1 | 78% 83% 73% | 161 166 155 | 41% 40% 42% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.81 0.73 0.90 | 169 133 209 | 14 6 8 | / 18 9 9 / | 11 4 7 | -4 -3 -1 | 74% 75% 73% | 108 94 122 | 25% 24% 26% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.81 0.55 1.10 | 187 127 253 | 16 6 10 | / 18 10 8 / | 2 2 0 | -2 -4 +2 | 61% 42% 82% | 104 71 139 | 34% 36% 33% | 4 1 3 | 4 2 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.74 0.60 0.89 | 148 142 154 | 13 6 7 | / 17 10 7 / | 2 2 0 | -4 -4 0 | 74% 75% 73% | 110 95 126 | 34% 21% 47% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 |
Supporting GE makes no sense tbh just cus he's indian. They have 0 representation of India in the game anyway
fr, ever since that "Forsaken", I don’t know why, but India just hasn’t had a new generation of rosters
oh yeah forsaken lmfao. but to be fair he isnt the reason esports died in india. it just never existed. they were exceptions, though not so much after the word.exe reveal lol. india simply doesnt have the esports culture which is a shame cus mumbai server do be havin some aim demons. even the one indian org that made into pacific ascension this year, even having a run to the playoffs disbanded their valorant roster after failing to ascend
oh yeah dont get me wrong i love this ge roster too and am lowk supporting it. but not cus its indian but cus of patmen frost n udotan. lol
PRX 2-1 GE
Mini definitely gets them a map with antistratting against his former team
Oh yeah this is gonna be a great match
I would be shocked if PRX destroy GE considering how well they played against VL
I do want PRX to win, but can I have a Patmen sheriff thrifty ace just to see everyone's reactions
Patmen and Invy play the skirmish; Pat 5-4 Invy.
PRX 2-1 GE
GE ban abyss
PRX ban haven
GE pick split
PRX pick bind
GE ban pearl
PRX ban corrode
Breeze remains.
GE 13-10 PRX
PRX 13-7 GE
PRX 14-12 GE
(source: trust me)
Edit:
I think a lot of people are missing the joke here, lmao.
i think prx will ban either abyss or breeze and pick bind or pearl as their first map
something and kristal will be in skirmish kristal said on his stream when duo with smth few days ago
ge best map abyss pearl split and u ban abyss pearl wow
PRX 2-0
Invy is going to destroy PatMen and Xavi8k's asses to prove that he is the strongest PH Valorant player.
#GEFighting ❤️💙
Hosting a VR watchparty in the BIGSCREEN BETA app (free on steam and meta store)
DM me if interested is joining 😀
we are known for suprises
https://www.vlr.gg/508839/paper-rex-vs-zeta-division-vct-2025-pacific-stage-2-w3
true + the players were sick + meaningless game win or lose they’d still enter playoffs as the first seed
each team taking the other team's respective map picks but damn GE demolished PRX on SPLIT. one more for Patmen's revenge?
GE looking strong but every year starts the same... PRX and Fnatic doing hella long vacation time and struggle in their first matches. xD Still nothing to worry about.
I don't defend their Breeze - it was yikes. Where did I mention it? But it's a fact that Alfajer just came out of vacation... same last year. Same last year with PRX struggling during first matches. That's all I meant... like losing to eco rounds which they usually never lose later when they are fully into the grind. Fnatic also showed 2025 that a struggling start means 0,0 with 3 grand finals later and kaajak becoming rookie of the year and the only Duelist playing positive numbers vs. aspas during Champs.
patmen is so good, Frost prep for this game was so nice, they literally read PRX half the time
insane game, gg both team, actual good valorant finally
the only thing GE lacks is aim. if it weren't for their aim, they wouldve won this series
f0rsaken swung out of smoke and killed 2 because one whiffed on breeze A site
triple swing on breeze A site during retake, lost.
1on1 xavi8k vs something to lose map 1
first pistol round on bind, davai 2k on b site
if it werent for patmen, it wouldve been more worse (proof: +15 from patmen)
as the legend once said
YOU INDIA YOU LOSE. nt patmen you are the goat
noobmaster6969 , get a job lil bro since we are the one taking yo jobs in yo country, stop bein a broke boi and start workin chop chop , an Aussie with insect problems won't really teach me stuff
"And ur mother needs an onlyfans"
they are calling it the most indian comeback ever.
idk if its an indian comeback or not but you are proving the point that ur fatherless and not above silver - plat
lol stfu Indian. Indian players are literally so bad that GE, an Indian org, has ZERO Indian players and there are absolutely ZERO Indian players in Tier 1 valorant.
So stop being a cornball and sit down.
Despite the loss, GE is a very strong team, and a Masters qualification looks achievable.
phew thank god for the win, this is such a good game. nt to GE they look strong
GG finally a close game, although GE should have won made some rookie mistakes
really wanted patmen to win for the memes but either way though he's not stopping bro
I still dont understand how patmen got replaced by invy. invy probably dont even have an international tour experience, still not proven himself he might fold under pressure, for sure a gamble for prx, but is it worth it?
patmen shows how good he is even in GE, definitely better than invy.
the reasons is they don't want to make a waste patmen talent undergo Initiator for PRX, they want patmen to grow up like today playing as hard carry for his team.
source: Trust me bro
Alecks always wanted invy and even patmen knows that he even talks about it during the first game of ge interview on paper invy is good but thats a team secret roster so obviously hes gonna be fragging but to me patmen is a better choice