they were a top 2 team at ascension 24 and top 3 at ascension 25 but if they failed to qualify both times then generally speaking many people would agree that they did not deserve their spot. maybe in 24, making 2nd with a game that close in ascension 24? i think the close results definitely spoke to their level.
but i mean this year they were clearly the 3rd best team, they lost 3-0 & 3-1 to 1st and 2nd and it wasn't really close.
idk. ascension was meant to be a merit-based qualifier tournament but if they're promoting teams that don't actually meet the qualification criteria then it could be seen as damaging to the integrity and mission of the tournament.
not that boom is at any fault anyway. they've been in the scene since the start, seem to be well-run.
this would not at all be a problem though if the org was promoted and the team is just ex-tln.
it's like you can't really make the argument that boom as a team deserved it over the team that got kicked out because talon just got top 3 pacific in stage 2, and boom got top 3 in tier 2. different levels yk