sen 2-1 mith
December 12, 2024
12:00 AM EST
Patch 9.10
MITH ban Sunset; SEN ban Ascent; MITH pick Haven; SEN pick Pearl; MITH ban Split; SEN ban Abyss; Bind remains
Betting
$100 on
Made in Thailand
returned
$580
at pre-match odds
5.80
MITH
odds pre-match
$100 on
Made in Thailand
returned
$600
at pre-match odds
6.00
MITH
odds pre-match
Maps/Stats
13
Sentinels
7 /
6
Haven
PICK
1:01:25
Made in Thailand
5 /
1
6
SEN 
MITH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.76 1.82 1.67 | 297 325 249 | 23 15 8 | / 9 7 2 / | 4 4 0 | +14 +8 +6 | 89% 83% 100% | 190 206 164 | 47% 43% 53% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.41 1.48 1.30 | 276 297 242 | 18 12 6 | / 11 7 4 / | 5 2 3 | +7 +5 +2 | 89% 83% 100% | 200 210 182 | 28% 34% 16% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.25 0.64 2.29 | 258 136 468 | 18 6 12 | / 13 9 4 / | 4 3 1 | +5 -3 +8 | 63% 58% 71% | 155 91 266 | 17% 19% 14% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.95 1.13 0.63 | 163 220 66 | 12 11 1 | / 11 8 3 / | 7 2 5 | +1 +3 -2 | 84% 92% 71% | 105 143 40 | 38% 45% 17% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.58 0.15 1.32 | 111 63 194 | 7 1 6 | / 12 9 3 / | 4 3 1 | -5 -8 +3 | 74% 67% 86% | 89 50 155 | 25% 8% 42% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.30 0.91 1.53 | 267 240 283 | 19 6 13 | / 15 7 8 / | 1 1 0 | +4 -1 +5 | 63% 71% 58% | 164 145 174 | 49% 55% 46% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
|
0.84 0.67 0.94 | 165 135 184 | 9 3 6 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 2 4 | -5 -3 -2 | 63% 57% 67% | 127 101 143 | 32% 67% 20% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
0.78 0.63 0.86 | 139 112 156 | 9 3 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 1 3 | -6 -4 -2 | 53% 57% 50% | 104 91 111 | 42% 38% 44% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
|
0.60 0.41 0.72 | 178 126 209 | 11 3 8 | / 18 6 12 / | 5 0 5 | -7 -3 -4 | 58% 43% 67% | 124 74 153 | 29% 33% 29% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.42 0.02 0.71 | 127 55 170 | 8 1 7 | / 16 7 9 / | 3 1 2 | -8 -6 -2 | 42% 14% 58% | 81 31 111 | 25% 33% 24% | 0 0 0 | 6 4 2 | -6 -4 -2 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.19 1.13 | 228 209 236 | 61 31 30 | / 52 29 23 / | 25 15 10 | +9 +2 +7 | 76% 75% 76% | 137 128 147 | 35% 38% 33% | 10 5 5 | 4 2 2 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.33 0.83 1.10 | 191 250 144 | 51 36 15 | / 47 27 20 / | 36 21 15 | +4 +9 -5 | 81% 88% 74% | 132 165 93 | 24% 27% 18% | 5 2 3 | 6 2 4 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.86 0.82 0.84 | 194 210 168 | 47 28 19 | / 55 31 24 / | 14 7 7 | -8 -3 -5 | 66% 68% 65% | 135 153 113 | 23% 27% 18% | 6 4 2 | 8 4 4 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.74 0.91 0.82 | 190 179 195 | 47 25 22 | / 56 32 24 / | 14 9 5 | -9 -7 -2 | 57% 55% 59% | 117 109 126 | 14% 13% 16% | 12 5 7 | 15 11 4 | -3 -6 +3 | |
|
0.59 1.04 0.80 | 175 138 220 | 45 19 26 | / 53 30 23 / | 23 12 11 | -8 -11 +3 | 72% 73% 71% | 114 88 145 | 28% 22% 32% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.16 1.26 | 233 248 226 | 65 33 32 | / 50 22 28 / | 20 9 11 | +15 +11 +4 | 74% 79% 70% | 164 164 164 | 41% 50% 35% | 7 3 4 | 5 4 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
|
1.07 1.38 1.24 | 234 196 263 | 64 26 38 | / 48 22 26 / | 6 1 5 | +16 +4 +12 | 73% 74% 73% | 143 114 168 | 35% 35% 35% | 10 6 4 | 4 1 3 | +6 +5 +1 | |
|
|
0.95 0.95 0.95 | 189 166 200 | 46 20 26 | / 48 21 27 / | 25 9 16 | -2 -1 -1 | 69% 71% 68% | 127 116 136 | 26% 25% 27% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
0.95 0.77 0.85 | 158 176 152 | 40 19 21 | / 51 23 28 / | 27 19 8 | -11 -4 -7 | 68% 76% 60% | 109 114 105 | 36% 46% 29% | 5 1 4 | 4 0 4 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
0.61 1.04 0.83 | 184 149 227 | 47 15 32 | / 54 24 30 / | 13 5 8 | -7 -9 +2 | 61% 44% 75% | 130 103 153 | 28% 28% 27% | 10 4 6 | 21 13 8 | -11 -9 -2 |
10
Sentinels
7 /
3
Pearl
PICK
56:40
Made in Thailand
5 /
8
13
SEN
MITH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.11 1.10 1.12 | 264 243 288 | 22 12 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 3 2 | +4 +3 +1 | 70% 83% 55% | 170 149 193 | 33% 24% 42% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.94 1.09 0.77 | 191 195 188 | 16 9 7 | / 18 8 10 / | 10 7 3 | -2 +1 -3 | 74% 83% 64% | 110 108 112 | 34% 29% 40% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
|
0.82 1.14 0.47 | 155 195 113 | 10 7 3 | / 16 7 9 / | 16 10 6 | -6 0 -6 | 70% 75% 64% | 101 127 73 | 21% 23% 15% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.65 0.79 0.50 | 131 188 71 | 10 7 3 | / 18 10 8 / | 4 3 1 | -8 -3 -5 | 57% 50% 64% | 85 118 49 | 10% 8% 13% | 2 2 0 | 4 4 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
|
0.20 0.23 0.17 | 111 126 96 | 8 5 3 | / 22 11 11 / | 3 2 1 | -14 -6 -8 | 39% 42% 36% | 77 99 54 | 14% 21% 6% | 2 1 1 | 6 3 3 | -4 -2 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.58 1.88 1.29 | 286 332 244 | 24 14 10 | / 14 6 8 / | 7 3 4 | +10 +8 +2 | 83% 100% 67% | 194 222 168 | 42% 52% 32% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
1.41 1.54 1.28 | 263 279 249 | 22 12 10 | / 13 5 8 / | 8 3 5 | +9 +7 +2 | 78% 91% 67% | 177 179 176 | 27% 16% 41% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
1.31 1.32 1.29 | 202 177 225 | 18 9 9 | / 11 4 7 / | 2 0 2 | +7 +5 +2 | 74% 73% 75% | 126 114 137 | 28% 28% 28% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
|
1.01 0.80 1.20 | 206 158 251 | 17 6 11 | / 15 6 9 / | 2 0 2 | +2 0 +2 | 74% 73% 75% | 134 115 152 | 26% 33% 21% | 7 3 4 | 5 3 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
0.87 1.16 0.62 | 143 182 109 | 11 6 5 | / 13 5 8 / | 11 10 1 | -2 +1 -3 | 74% 100% 50% | 100 123 79 | 46% 56% 33% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
15
Sentinels
7 /
5
/ 3
Bind
1:15:19
Made in Thailand
5 /
7
/ 5
17
SEN
MITH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
SEN
MITH
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
All
Attack
Defend
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.39 1.61 1.16 | 256 314 200 | 29 18 11 | / 20 12 8 / | 13 9 4 | +9 +6 +3 | 88% 94% 81% | 170 210 130 | 22% 23% 19% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
|
0.95 0.86 1.05 | 196 207 185 | 21 11 10 | / 22 13 9 / | 6 3 3 | -1 -2 +1 | 72% 75% 69% | 137 150 124 | 23% 22% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
|
0.90 0.53 1.27 | 197 133 262 | 22 7 15 | / 25 14 11 / | 11 4 7 | -3 -7 +4 | 69% 63% 75% | 124 84 165 | 28% 39% 24% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
0.70 0.53 0.86 | 149 116 184 | 16 6 10 | / 23 12 11 / | 14 6 8 | -7 -6 -1 | 72% 69% 75% | 89 70 108 | 23% 29% 19% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
|
0.69 0.77 0.60 | 182 206 160 | 19 12 7 | / 25 13 12 / | 6 3 3 | -6 -1 -5 | 53% 56% 50% | 117 116 118 | 15% 12% 18% | 6 2 4 | 10 6 4 | -4 -4 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.42 1.45 1.39 | 234 244 226 | 30 16 14 | / 18 10 8 / | 8 6 2 | +12 +6 +6 | 78% 81% 75% | 167 164 169 | 47% 52% 43% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
1.15 0.97 1.34 | 233 190 276 | 27 11 16 | / 22 11 11 / | 3 0 3 | +5 0 +5 | 78% 75% 81% | 142 99 186 | 31% 30% 32% | 6 5 1 | 1 0 1 | +5 +5 0 | |
|
|
0.95 0.74 1.16 | 218 184 252 | 22 8 14 | / 23 11 12 / | 8 4 4 | -1 -3 +2 | 63% 38% 88% | 156 127 185 | 29% 26% 33% | 3 1 2 | 10 6 4 | -7 -5 -2 | |
|
|
0.88 0.95 0.82 | 191 200 183 | 20 10 10 | / 23 11 12 / | 12 8 4 | -3 -1 -2 | 72% 69% 75% | 118 117 119 | 28% 41% 23% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
|
0.69 0.66 0.72 | 139 102 177 | 15 5 10 | / 21 10 11 / | 11 4 7 | -6 -5 -1 | 66% 63% 69% | 91 80 102 | 22% 23% 21% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
Conclusion: Who Would Likely Win?
Sentinels would be the favorites in this matchup. While MiTH is a talented and strong team within Southeast Asia, Sentinels’ experience, individual skill, and tactical depth would likely allow them to come out on top in a BO3 series.
Why Sentinels Wins:
Experience & Consistency: Sentinels have been battle-tested at the highest levels of competition, while MiTH is still working to solidify its place on the international stage.
Team Coordination: Sentinels’ strong communication and deep map knowledge give them an edge in a tactical shooter like Valorant.
Individual Skill: Sentinels have multiple players capable of carrying games in key moments, and their individual prowess often makes the difference.
Since when do 90% of VLR users think a Tier 2 team will beat a Masters winner. Not even close
SEN 2 - 1 MITH
Sen 13-7 MITH (Pearl)
Sen 10-13 MITH (Haven)
Sen 13-5 MITH (Split)
Zekken is gonna have a better game this time but cgrs my king will frag
pretty sure there's 3 matches today so they probably want to try and finish at around the same time
Love when teams find a way to throw their own map pick as the much better team on paper
who else wishing talon would make a full thai roster again and get two players from MITH 🙏🙏
MITH's disciplined teamwork that looks better than tier 1 teams is truly amazing
For a pure Thai team that played Challengers before they're doing a great job against one of the best teams in the world... but in the end you can simply see that Sentinels are way cooler in heated moments / have much more experience. Mechanically it's pretty even.
*Edit: The Jinx is real.
pick LAZ And CGRS in a T1 team like TS OR RRQ OR EVEN IN REPLACEMENT FOR BAN AND GOvERNOR
Magnificent. Never underestimate any Challengers teams.
The tier barriers are a construct.
What a game
if this isnt the perfect example for Riot as to why we need more open circuits then idk
Wages are different in NA compared to asia bro. Like cost of living in NA is like 5x more
still make more than 5x amount of apac salaries. masters winner losing to a team that dont even make ascension btw
You knew there was a problem with the stars from the beginning when zellsis was top fragging 🤣
I can't imagine all this happening in one month. Kickoff will be incredible
Game Difficulty:
Easy
Medium
Hard
Asian(nobodies)
Killua : Assassin
Laz : The Goat
Discord