EDG 2-0 ASE
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
223 | 18 | / 17 / | 2 | +1 | ||||||||
|
215 | 16 | / 17 / | 5 | -1 | ||||||||
|
187 | 14 | / 15 / | 2 | -1 | ||||||||
|
184 | 16 | / 15 / | 7 | +1 | ||||||||
|
104 | 6 | / 17 / | 14 | -11 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
256 | 19 | / 13 / | 9 | +6 | ||||||||
|
225 | 18 | / 15 / | 5 | +3 | ||||||||
|
219 | 17 | / 14 / | 9 | +3 | ||||||||
|
170 | 13 | / 16 / | 11 | -3 | ||||||||
|
158 | 14 | / 12 / | 4 | +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
206 | 50 | / 54 / | 27 | -4 | ||||||||
|
205 | 52 | / 53 / | 13 | -1 | ||||||||
|
195 | 52 | / 46 / | 30 | +6 | ||||||||
|
182 | 47 | / 58 / | 8 | -11 | ||||||||
|
182 | 47 | / 50 / | 18 | -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
264 | 70 | / 55 / | 11 | +15 | ||||||||
|
222 | 58 | / 47 / | 29 | +11 | ||||||||
|
176 | 47 | / 48 / | 26 | -1 | ||||||||
|
174 | 45 | / 46 / | 13 | -1 | ||||||||
|
165 | 41 | / 52 / | 38 | -11 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
227 | 21 | / 15 / | 0 | +6 | ||||||||
|
226 | 18 | / 16 / | 10 | +2 | ||||||||
|
217 | 19 | / 15 / | 11 | +4 | ||||||||
|
199 | 17 | / 16 / | 8 | +1 | ||||||||
|
172 | 14 | / 19 / | 4 | -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
243 | 20 | / 20 / | 3 | 0 | ||||||||
|
207 | 19 | / 17 / | 9 | +2 | ||||||||
|
201 | 15 | / 18 / | 5 | -3 | ||||||||
|
185 | 14 | / 17 / | 22 | -3 | ||||||||
|
141 | 13 | / 17 / | 7 | -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
214 | 20 | / 18 / | 4 | +2 | ||||||||
|
192 | 17 | / 20 / | 3 | -3 | ||||||||
|
188 | 19 | / 24 / | 2 | -5 | ||||||||
|
183 | 17 | / 16 / | 12 | +1 | ||||||||
|
178 | 16 | / 21 / | 12 | -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
324 | 32 | / 20 / | 3 | +12 | ||||||||
|
203 | 20 | / 17 / | 11 | +3 | ||||||||
|
167 | 17 | / 17 / | 10 | 0 | ||||||||
|
164 | 16 | / 16 / | 4 | 0 | ||||||||
|
140 | 14 | / 19 / | 5 | -5 |
EDG should be able to beat ASE in this series. After seeing TES's performance on Sunset (one of EDG's strong maps), I wouldn't be surprised if ASE replicated that sort of performance and countered EDG on a map. Regardless, I think that you could argue that the 10 rounds won by TES was a fluke and that EDG was throwing or whatever (kk on cypher lol).
EDG 2-0 win sounds very convincing imo
11-10 -> playing overaggressive vs half buy, that led to close and disadvantageous(50/50 at the best) positions in fights.
11-11 -> have an open frag(with a nice util chek on a main, and great setup for KK), and after it overaggress again(like why Haodong plays in such agressive positions, on Astra with util!!!), leaving mid open for lurk.
Yes, EDG playstile is bold and offensive based, but in this, game deciding rounds, ASE used it to their advantage, in the end getting a win on Split.
If they played at least one of these round a little more reserved, they would probably end this series 2-0 :/