RA 2-1 ASE
TE
FPX
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
273 | 20 | / 15 / | 7 | +5 | ||||||||
|
260 | 20 | / 12 / | 7 | +8 | ||||||||
|
237 | 19 | / 11 / | 6 | +8 | ||||||||
|
143 | 10 | / 11 / | 14 | -1 | ||||||||
|
140 | 9 | / 11 / | 6 | -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
200 | 12 | / 15 / | 4 | -3 | ||||||||
|
187 | 14 | / 15 / | 2 | -1 | ||||||||
|
164 | 12 | / 15 / | 3 | -3 | ||||||||
|
161 | 12 | / 17 / | 1 | -5 | ||||||||
|
158 | 10 | / 16 / | 7 | -6 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
244 | 51 | / 44 / | 13 | +7 | ||||||||
|
220 | 48 | / 43 / | 15 | +5 | ||||||||
|
193 | 39 | / 42 / | 14 | -3 | ||||||||
|
172 | 35 | / 37 / | 28 | -2 | ||||||||
|
141 | 27 | / 38 / | 28 | -11 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
212 | 47 | / 37 / | 13 | +10 | ||||||||
|
202 | 40 | / 47 / | 10 | -7 | ||||||||
|
200 | 42 | / 33 / | 15 | +9 | ||||||||
|
196 | 42 | / 42 / | 8 | 0 | ||||||||
|
166 | 33 | / 41 / | 24 | -8 |
TE
FPX
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
236 | 15 | / 16 / | 4 | -1 | ||||||||
|
223 | 17 | / 15 / | 2 | +2 | ||||||||
|
192 | 12 | / 14 / | 10 | -2 | ||||||||
|
192 | 12 | / 15 / | 5 | -3 | ||||||||
|
162 | 9 | / 13 / | 9 | -4 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
258 | 17 | / 13 / | 4 | +4 | ||||||||
|
225 | 16 | / 12 / | 6 | +4 | ||||||||
|
214 | 16 | / 12 / | 5 | +4 | ||||||||
|
209 | 15 | / 14 / | 2 | +1 | ||||||||
|
138 | 9 | / 14 / | 9 | -5 |
TE
FPX
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
237 | 14 | / 14 / | 4 | 0 | ||||||||
|
208 | 16 | / 16 / | 3 | 0 | ||||||||
|
202 | 15 | / 15 / | 4 | 0 | ||||||||
|
117 | 8 | / 14 / | 5 | -6 | ||||||||
|
87 | 4 | / 12 / | 12 | -8 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
247 | 19 | / 10 / | 4 | +9 | ||||||||
|
202 | 14 | / 11 / | 8 | +3 | ||||||||
|
192 | 13 | / 13 / | 4 | 0 | ||||||||
|
188 | 11 | / 17 / | 5 | -6 | ||||||||
|
186 | 14 | / 6 / | 6 | +8 |
What an absolute banger. The biggest question in my mind is "will they play Ascent?" FPX absolutely dominated ASE on Ascent, beating them 13-1, and I'm sure many of us are aware of just how strong Trace Esports can be on that map. It's definitely going to be a close match regardless of the maps played. I believe that it will go all three maps, but I can't pinpoint a winner this time. Going off my gut and intuition, I think TE will come out on top of a 2-1 hard fought win. I just feel like TE's individual players are just better than the FPX players; but that's just my opinion.
2-1 TE win.
Yeah but FPX's clearly stepped up their Ascent game since their last meeting with TE.
Honestly fpx have improved a lot since last act, Berlin’s aim is more crisp, and during the split match, they were antistratting te really well, huge props to them, hopefully they don’t just crumble against EDG