bbl-gambit. 2-0 gambit
GMB
BBL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.55 1.67 1.51 | 288 390 255 | 17 6 11 | / 7 2 5 / | 6 2 4 | +10 +4 +6 | 81% 75% 83% | 167 144 174 | 32% 31% 32% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.40 1.04 1.51 | 282 131 333 | 17 2 15 | / 10 3 7 / | 4 4 0 | +7 -1 +8 | 88% 100% 83% | 168 80 198 | 39% 13% 45% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.36 0.91 1.51 | 206 133 231 | 11 2 9 | / 6 2 4 / | 5 0 5 | +5 0 +5 | 75% 75% 75% | 123 34 153 | 13% 50% 10% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.35 2.23 1.05 | 256 406 206 | 15 6 9 | / 8 1 7 / | 3 1 2 | +7 +5 +2 | 94% 100% 92% | 174 232 154 | 47% 38% 52% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.24 1.25 1.23 | 237 233 238 | 13 3 10 | / 7 2 5 / | 9 4 5 | +6 +1 +5 | 88% 100% 83% | 133 69 155 | 29% 29% 29% | 2 1 1 | 3 0 3 | -1 +1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.15 1.13 1.23 | 233 232 237 | 13 9 4 | / 12 9 3 / | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | 69% 58% 100% | 127 144 74 | 19% 21% 11% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.55 0.61 0.37 | 150 152 146 | 7 6 1 | / 15 11 4 / | 1 1 0 | -8 -5 -3 | 44% 50% 25% | 99 101 92 | 31% 29% 38% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.54 0.73 0.03 | 145 146 144 | 6 5 1 | / 14 10 4 / | 2 1 1 | -8 -5 -3 | 56% 58% 50% | 89 92 80 | 8% 12% 0% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.30 0.47 0.01 | 97 123 20 | 5 5 0 | / 15 11 4 / | 2 2 0 | -10 -6 -4 | 38% 50% | 60 76 10 | 31% 33% 0% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.29 0.05 0.98 | 130 74 302 | 7 3 4 | / 17 13 4 / | 3 2 1 | -10 -10 0 | 44% 33% 75% | 78 45 178 | 23% 22% 23% | 3 2 1 | 3 3 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 1.65 1.51 | 311 274 347 | 42 16 26 | / 20 11 9 / | 9 5 4 | +22 +5 +17 | 92% 94% 90% | 180 170 188 | 23% 14% 32% | 5 1 4 | 1 0 1 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.28 1.43 1.36 | 273 294 254 | 34 17 17 | / 19 10 9 / | 14 4 10 | +15 +7 +8 | 81% 75% 85% | 165 163 166 | 30% 31% 29% | 6 4 2 | 1 0 1 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
1.21 1.40 1.31 | 243 218 264 | 34 13 21 | / 16 8 8 / | 10 5 5 | +18 +5 +13 | 83% 81% 85% | 132 111 148 | 36% 40% 33% | 5 3 2 | 6 3 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.07 1.41 1.26 | 214 213 217 | 26 12 14 | / 17 10 7 / | 9 1 8 | +9 +2 +7 | 75% 75% 75% | 132 134 130 | 14% 16% 11% | 5 2 3 | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.93 0.84 0.88 | 192 204 171 | 23 11 12 | / 22 10 12 / | 8 5 3 | +1 +1 0 | 86% 81% 90% | 120 122 118 | 41% 35% 47% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.84 1.45 1.11 | 245 178 333 | 28 11 17 | / 29 17 12 / | 5 2 3 | -1 -6 +5 | 64% 50% 81% | 142 100 194 | 24% 16% 30% | 4 3 1 | 2 1 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.98 0.53 0.77 | 177 194 165 | 19 12 7 | / 30 16 14 / | 8 4 4 | -11 -4 -7 | 56% 55% 56% | 125 124 126 | 16% 18% 13% | 2 1 1 | 6 2 4 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.11 1.11 0.56 | 157 91 247 | 20 6 14 | / 34 22 12 / | 4 2 2 | -14 -16 +2 | 44% 30% 63% | 99 53 157 | 32% 25% 35% | 5 2 3 | 8 6 2 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
0.52 0.33 0.44 | 116 131 89 | 12 8 4 | / 32 18 14 / | 3 2 1 | -20 -10 -10 | 36% 45% 25% | 78 90 64 | 25% 26% 25% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.53 0.36 0.43 | 132 152 116 | 15 9 6 | / 34 19 15 / | 5 5 0 | -19 -10 -9 | 50% 55% 44% | 86 95 74 | 24% 21% 29% | 3 2 1 | 3 1 2 | 0 +1 -1 |
GMB
BBL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.60 1.44 1.85 | 339 322 367 | 25 14 11 | / 10 8 2 / | 5 1 4 | +15 +6 +9 | 95% 92% 100% | 190 200 174 | 14% 14% 15% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.38 1.20 1.65 | 248 214 302 | 21 10 11 | / 9 6 3 / | 1 1 0 | +12 +4 +8 | 80% 75% 88% | 130 125 138 | 42% 43% 40% | 3 2 1 | 3 3 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.21 1.15 1.31 | 258 263 252 | 17 11 6 | / 12 8 4 / | 8 2 6 | +5 +3 +2 | 80% 75% 88% | 163 170 153 | 29% 31% 25% | 4 3 1 | 1 0 1 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.17 1.12 1.25 | 222 240 197 | 15 10 5 | / 11 8 3 / | 4 1 3 | +4 +2 +2 | 75% 75% 75% | 139 168 97 | 14% 14% 14% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.51 0.50 0.53 | 128 136 118 | 8 5 3 | / 14 9 5 / | 5 4 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 80% 75% 88% | 77 85 64 | 30% 31% 29% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.08 0.41 1.52 | 257 96 365 | 15 2 13 | / 17 8 9 / | 5 2 3 | -2 -6 +4 | 60% 38% 75% | 154 34 234 | 28% 0% 33% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.96 1.35 0.70 | 209 265 173 | 13 7 6 | / 16 6 10 / | 6 3 3 | -3 +1 -4 | 55% 50% 58% | 153 172 141 | 20% 24% 17% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.77 0.21 1.15 | 184 118 229 | 13 3 10 | / 17 9 8 / | 1 0 1 | -4 -6 +2 | 45% 25% 58% | 116 65 150 | 39% 29% 43% | 2 0 2 | 5 3 2 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.53 0.62 0.47 | 167 196 148 | 10 4 6 | / 19 8 11 / | 3 3 0 | -9 -4 -5 | 60% 63% 58% | 106 123 96 | 21% 11% 31% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.34 0.38 0.32 | 82 101 70 | 5 2 3 | / 17 7 10 / | 2 1 1 | -12 -5 -7 | 30% 38% 25% | 62 74 54 | 20% 21% 19% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
BBL 2-1 Gambit. this game depends if legoo plays good and redgar does not play like trash.
Turkish people is there any reason why is legoo playing raze over Aslan. It makes more sense to put aslan on raze and legoo on smokes.
Legoo plays raze over aslan cause he was playing raze since beta so hes movement with raze is just better than aslan. But i think aslan should play duelist if somebody is going to play it on the team. And legoo tweeted about it today (after liquid match) he said that he is not gonna play raze anymore cause he knows that he is not that effective with raze. So we prolly see aslan with the duelist if its needed and i think its better. We saw it on haven today and it worked very well.However this match is going to be tough for us. Hope BBL can win.
Would be amazing but I don't see that happening as Russ and aimdll are cross with lauress
I can objectively say this : 2 teams will do their best. I think the series will end on the 2-1 BBL side. #BBLWIN
2-1 BBL
LOL no one can have a take on this page without getting downfragged, that being said, 2-0 gambit.
Both teams were fun to watch and this match will probably be a banger - I just really hope both teams performs to their scrim level. Cuz i think neither team showed their true potential in those previous matches - most likely nerves.
he said that he will never pick raze, bbl gonna win this 2-0, and rematch with liquid will be easy.
GAMBİT2-0 BBL It will be easy for Gambit because there are two bad players in bbl
Is there any ScreaM on Gambit ?
-No.
So BBL will win GAMBIT and than they will beat Liquid.
map 1 : icebox 14-12 BBL
map 2 : Ascent 13-10 Gambit
map 3 : Haven 13-8 BBl
2-1 BBL
map1: ascent 13-3 gambit
map2: icebox 13-7 gambit
2-0 gambit
not even close kanka
2 close games against FPX already tells enough. Gambit should take this but not so easily possibly 2-1 for Gambit
i want gambit to win so that the only CIS team can show us something they are capable of.
you can argue that FPX are CIS considering 3/5 of their players are CIS, they just compete in europe
legoo and kero was very bad againt tl. They don't play like this all the time. You can watch his streams if you want
I'm thinking 2-1 gambit, but BBL still have a good chance to win. Hoping for a good game
aimdll and russ should leave for good.
They can easily play in EU.
aslan is 27 y.o so he should stay in his country.
aimdll can easily be starplayer in EU.
Russ is starplayer anyway.
They can win more money, achieve more and play and learn from real IGLs.
Legoo cant use 3 star players because he is below average at being IGL.
I hope Russ and aimDLL can realize this situation as fast as possible. If there was a better IGL in Turkey, the situation would be different. Not having good IGLs is the main problem in the Turkish FPS scene. A lot of excellent aims but no brains.
If BBL play like first game of Liq series. They can win 2-1 but its too hard for BBL.
Gambit EZ 2-0
BBL has no chance. Turkey is for sure the worst region and they have already proved it
Turkey is much better region than some dogshits like Latam or Japan. Just unlucky that those 2 have their own slots but Turkey doesn't. Rito stupid.
Proof that Latam is trash, and so is Japan:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ValorantCompetitive/comments/mm5jpr/who_and_where_had_the_best_headshot_percentage_in/
Bruh, why u mad against LATAM? We never criticize other regions and you came talking shit about us
You're mad because CIS doesn't have a slot from his region?
Yes, not only CIS but also Turkey. Both 100 tiers above Latam.
It saddens me that people talk so much shit about Turkey without realizing how bad other regions are.
We're talking shit about Turkey?
we never said something like that and we just have to wait to see how good we are, we know us aren't the better, but we're trying against regions with better history on FPS
Japan and Korea are 100x better than Turkey and any other region. Wait for masters 2 korea will fuck everyone
No they aren't dumbass, Futbolist would shit on Vision Strikers, Absolute Jupiter or whoever plays there
You are for sure below average IQ. In fact, anyone who believes that Korea will dominate is braindead.
We've all heard of Turkish Jett, but why is no one talking about russki Jett )) D3FFO looking nutty in round 9(when score was 7-1 to Gambit)
Very bad look for BBL so far. Gambit look like they could knock out Liquid presuming Liquid falls against FPX.
dude gambit is no joke their aim is crispy so far. Also seem to play off each other really well.
BBL about to steal the identity of certain North American org, which was supposedly Built By Gamers
Its not hard to read BBL.
Their IGL is below average.
And Sova isnt even close to Chronicle's Sova play.
When igl is below average ur 3 star players cant work together.
aimdll russ and aslan all these 3 have star player material.
The turkish stream has literally four times more viewers than the english one
2 TR, 2 CIS seems fair, looking at the rankings the 3rd best CIS team is below TR's 2nd best.
Next EMEA Challengers Finals better have 2 CIS and 2 TR, Gambit showing up for CIS
every single time you try to get A or B, atleast 4 member of opponent are there .. this is not the way you win .. after seeing haven preparation this not the way you play in your favorite map ..
everyone called me racist when I put FUT, OXY and BBL below TL, Guild and Gambit ¯\(ツ)/¯
I didt see anything about racism on this sentences but Turks generally say racist when someone say them y are bad
For some reason saying "Turkish teams are bad" gets read as "Turkish teams are bad, because they are turks", prob language barrier.
I mean "turkish" is a nationality, a language and an ethnicity, but strange to presume people are being racist.
its mostly bcs english is gramatically opposite to turkish so its real hard to learn + most of those people are so young so these players are kind of heroes for them this is why so passionate about turkish players ..
Eu, tr, cis must be assemble for goodness of tr teams, because individual regional success only brought money
Can we talk about how nutty sheydos is? His aim is actually disgusting.
Not really russ aim and aslan has better aim than most of the gambit but otger two are nothing more than immo aim
Except for LEGOO, I don’t think that’s true. Due to their recent matches, I always thought They play like they don’t have any tactics. It’s like they think that aim is gonna solve all their problem, but it’s not. I think Futbolist as the best team right now and I only expect/believe in them to win .
It should but the Turkish scene moves a lot of numbers but 2 Cis AND 2 TR would be much more fair
It was easy for Gambit. Turkey does not deserve 3 slots.Just 1 is enough. That would be futbolist.
Turks only good on ranked with macro and what not else. In Tournaments where everything is checked and u cannot cheat and be ranked hero like (nisaY) so they become bots who will keep getting rekt by EU.
I bet tier 3 EU could beat Tier 1 Turkish team in tourmament, not ranked of course.