Now that franchising in coming to an end

#1

We can see which teams have done the best in terms of event qualification across franchising (besides ofc London and Shanghai)

Americas

G2 - 6 (Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul, Masters Bangkok, Masters Toronto, Champions Paris, Masters Santiago)
SEN - 5 (Masters Madrid, Champions Seoul, Masters Bangkok, Masters Toronto, Champions Paris)
NRG - 4 (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA, Champions Paris, Masters Santiago)
Loud - 3 (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA, Masters Madrid)

5-8. EG (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA), KRU (Champions LA, Champions Seoul), LEV (Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul), MIBR (Masters Toronto, Champions Paris) - 2

9/10. 100T (Masters Shanghai), Furia (Masters Santiago) - 1

11-13. C9, 2G, NV (so far) - 0

EMEA

1/2. FNC (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA, Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul, Masters Toronto, Champions Paris), TL (Masters Tokyo, Champions Seoul, Masters Bangkok, Masters Toronto, Champions Paris, Masters Santiago) - 6

TH - 5 (Masters Madrid, Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul, Masters Toronto, Champions Paris)
FUT - 4 (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA, Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul)

5-7. NAVI (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA), GX (Champions LA, Champions Paris), VIT (Champions Seoul, Masters Bangkok) - 2

8-10. KC (Masters Madrid), M8, (Masters Santiago|), BBL (Masters Santiago) - 1

11-4. KOI, APKS, PCIFIC, EF (so far) - 0

Pacific

PRX - 8 (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA, Masters Madrid, Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul, Masters Toronto, Champions Paris, Masters Santiago)
T1 - 6 (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA, Masters Shanghai, Masters Bangkok, Champions Paris, Masters Santiago)
DRX - 5 (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA, Champions Seoul, Masters Bangkok, Champions Paris)
GEN - 4 (Masters Madrid, Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul, Masters Toronto)
RRQ - 2 (Masters Toronto, Champions Paris)

6-8. ZETA (Champions LA), TLN/FS (Champions Seoul), NS (Masters Santiago) - 1

9-14. TS, GE, DFM, BLD, BME, VRL - 0 (so far)

China

EDG - 8 (Masters Tokyo, Champions LA, Masters Madrid, Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul, Masters Bangkok, Champions Paris, Masters Santiago)

2/3. BLG (Champions LA, Champions Seoul, Masters Toronto, Champions Paris), FPX (Champions LA, Masters Madrid, Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul) - 4

XLG - 3 (Masters Toronto, Champions Paris, Masters Santiago)

5/6. DRG (Masters Shanghai, Champions Paris), TE (Champions Seoul, Masters Bangkok) - 2

7/8. WOL (Masters Toronto), AG (Masters Santiago) - 1

9-12. TEC, TYL, JDG, NOVA - 0 (so far)

#2

SENfns

1

Frags

+

–

g2 being number 1 in americas and an ascension team is cool

#6

Skwish

3

Frags

+

–

allat just to have 0 trophies

#12

SENfns

3

Frags

+

–

yeah its unfortunate that every team below them combined has more trophies than emea and china combined

#19

deusmoooo

0

Frags

+

–

just like a certain ~~flair~~ team 🫪

#3

uwukitten

0

Frags

+

–

when you put it this way pacific looks awfully top heavy

#4

my-dad-ate-my-toes

0

Frags

+

–

Lowkey I was baffled going through it I thought fs there were gonna be more than 8 teams that went to internationals

Pacific has always had the most bottom feeder teams tho (besides China) so ig it makes sense

Hoping for GE and DFM to make events ngl

DFM ik is just a pipe dream tho

#5

foythvlr

4

Frags

+

–

Apac is just korean teams rotating whos better and prx

#7

amigo_colega

0

Frags

+

–

hey yeah

#8

Addammo

1

Frags

+

–

fully did not expect to see other teams in the EMEA section

#9

HIMNIJ

0

Frags

+

–

the 3 next to TH in the emea section should be a 5

#10

my-dad-ate-my-toes

0

Frags

+

–

Yh I accidentally made it 3 after looking at their placement in EMEA

#11

HIMNIJ

0

Frags

+

–

its crazy that the only region with a tie in first place is the one that gets one team region allegations

#13

Addammo

0

Frags

+

–

unfortunately you have to actually do something at the internationals

#20

HIMNIJ

0

Frags

+

–

i mean its not like emea doesnt place high or win games like china, we just dont win trophies, we have the same number of grand finals appearance as americas, one less than apac, last time i did the maths (not including this year iirc) we had a very slightly worse average placement across all years since 2023, but equal to americas 2024 and apac 2025, average placement for 2023 is hard cause regions had extra slots and lockin existed etc.

#14

catNmouse

0

Frags

+

–

is it just not based off of placements though?

#21

HIMNIJ

0

Frags

+

–

what placements though? ppl were calling emea a 1 team region at fucking shanghai and we were the only region with 3 teams in playoffs, its just a narrative ppl created cause of 2023 fnatic and no one cares to actually update their opinions

#15

Thegreat

0

Frags

+

–

As a casual viewer of only Pacfic(mostly T2) and fnatic's matches, I even forgot that C9 is in valorant partnership until i joined VLR.

#16

my-dad-ate-my-toes

1

Frags

+

–

So did they dw bro

#17

Warlordwibz

0

Frags

+

–

Since FNC won LOCK/IN, EMEA got a 4th representation at Masters Tokyo.
FNC also won masters Tokyo, EMEA got a 5th representation at Champs LA.
EMEA had 2 extra teams in 2023 compare to Americas and Pacific as international winner gets additional representation (VCT CN wasn't established).
NAVI being the 4th EMEA qual to Masters Tokyo and 5th qual to Champs LA would shift its position to 10-14.

#18

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

ASE snubbed