Do you guys really think SEN would be better if they had their 24 roster right now? I see too many people blaming their new add-ons when their core hasn't been looking all that great either.
-
Recently, Johnqt has been shooting but earlier this year his aim looked really unsteady, when so many SEN fans praised his fragging in 24. It's clear to me that Johnqt 24 > Johnqt 25
-
Zellsis is as inconsistent as ever, I see a lot of sen fans insist that he's the glue and helps steady the teams mental but is it really worth the trade-off of having a worse player when better talent does exist? I can't say he's THE problem, but his inconsistency is a problem. Zellsis 24 vs 25???? 24 > 25?
-
Zekken is still just a really great player so it's hard to ask for more out him but I do want to point Zekken hasn't really shown the same level dominance as he did Madrid last year. Zekken might have improved but at least relative to the competition his performance in 24 stands out more, Zekken 24 > 25
-
Tenz vs Bang. I mean evidently Tenz did have higher fragging power than Bang so there is an argument that bang is failing to live up to the person he replaced. Tenz 24 > Bang 25
-
N4RRATE vs Sacy. Similiar to Zellsis I can't judge stuff that happens outside the game but it's not crazy to say N4RRATE is a lot more a fragger than Sacy and his util usage has looked pretty solid so I want to say Sacy 24 < N4RRATE 25
I feel like you guys need to realise that SEN isn't worse because of the new players but because they haven't improved as much as other teams did between 24 and 25.







