Actually so funny that flor isn’t suspended immediately like sinatraa was lmaoo. Also the fact that some narrate words on twitter think that the reason they didn’t get suspended is because flor isn’t playing is just funny. Riot suspended Chet for showing scrims while being off a team for over 3 months so why tf isn’t flor suspended??? Another fucking biased riot take and from the narrate words on twitter
“Riot isn’t biased”
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Shes not on a team - I assume they would amend their statement if she wanted to come back but i doubt she will any time soon
well shes not playing is what i mean, and lowkey the reason she dipped from apeks is obv because the person told flor she was releasing the allegations to the public - flor made the tactical move to quit before so highly doubt shes coming back any time soon if not ever - who tf would wanna work with that psycho r*pist anyway
Chet was also not on a team and didn’t have any information about him returning anytime soon, yet they still suspended him. How come the same actions aren’t taken against flor for committing a literal crime.
val community called out kamo for the deeds he did as a minor I guess
His name was taken in public.
But in Flor case, it is not okay to take her name for the deeds she did as a minor??
She is legally a adult now not a minor anymore.
I get riot not mentioning her name but val community defending it by saying that minor thing is very wrong imo.
The community should be unbiased atleast.
Kamo asked for nudes tho still not excusable while Flor lit sexually assaulted sb??? Lit abused? 😭
that whole nude thing and slurs was started by her girlfriend trying to get him to say the word and randomly sending nudes aswell she was responsible for allat kamo never asked for nudes in the first place
my guess is that they’re learning from the sinatraa situation and actually doing to flor what should’ve been done to him, but in this case why not issue an apology to sinatraa for legit ruining his career
either way riot legit has no consistency
they're def not "learning" from the sinatraa situation and they will go back to their old approach next time. this is just an exception
only reason why they aren't name dropping its due to legal stuff.
they did the same thing to other people lmao its not learning its literally just being biased
sinatraa got suspended because he didn’t wanna participate with his investigation u retard XD
One look at your name and I can tell you’re another brainless flor fan trying to defend any honor that monster had. Sinatraa got suspended the same day the allegations came out which is why in the tweet it said he wasn’t allowed to compete that weekend.
Are you stupid? he was suspended immediately after the claims came out and suspended again because the dude who was leading the suspension already made up his mind about it before it came to an end LMAO, defending a r@p1st is crazy dawg.
no, he got suspended because he didn’t cooperate with the investigation as said in the ruling :)
- This is about me somehow “not cooperating” and “lying” on 2 occasions. I DID fully cooperate with the investigation to my best ability. I answered every question they had for me, but since I didn’t provide the video which I said I would in a twitter post (lawyer told me it was good to post), they said I didn’t cooperate because of that. The reason I didn’t provide the video is because I just thought she MUST provide the video because she’s accusing me , but I guess not. I understand though because the nature of the allegations and it being 2020, they had to make me look as bad as possible so they don’t take backlash. The 2nd “lie” was a question they asked me about Emma (my current girlfriend of 4 years). I don’t remember the exact words, but the question was basically “are you and emma still good after the accusation” Which I answered yes to because we were genuinely good at the time as I was literally taking the interview in her parents house. Then they told me that was a lie because there was a post on her private twitter account that said otherwise that I had no clue about. She made the post immediately after the allegations happened and left our apartment to go to her parents house for a day to clear her head because emotions were high understandably. She immediately regretted leaving me alone for a day and asked me to come and stay with her at her parents house. So I guess the lie was me saying we were good because that’s just what I thought but there was a post on a private twitter that “proved” it wrong 🤣
And
- I don’t even know why i’m adding this because it’ll probably get me banned or something but I just think this is unacceptable. Below is a screenshot of “Alex Francois”, head of esports at riot, and head of my investigation (not 100% sure he was head of investigation but he was the one to make the final decision of my ban im 90% sure) liking this twitter post about me before the investigation has even started/completed, so it seems like his mind was made up already. The screenshot is real and my former agent can confirm it since I sent it to him when it happened
Defending your "goat" flor after being labeled as a r@p1st is just crazy work lmao
doesnt matter. rapists (like sinatraa and flor) dont deserve fair treatment
Flor doesn't deserve fair treatment, sinatraa on the other hand was proven innocent, just maybe not the best person in the world.
While Sinatraa maintained his innocence throughout the whole ordeal and was never found guilty in a court of law, he hasn’t seriously returned to professional play.
so everything here is 100% true then? Riot still didn’t suspend him for rape so idk what your point is here XD
He didn't get suspended for rape because he was innocent he got suspended because of allegations...
Yeah and what about the initial suspension? was that also due to "poor cooperation"?
just thought id add to this from the banned player section on riots page. he was initially banned for "In-compliance With Investigations" that lasted 6 months and then indefinitely for "Incomplete training". because this (flor) hasnt been escalated just yet to the law afiak, they wont suspend her yet because theres nothing to go off. but anyway because he didnt do the training to like clear his name, from riots pov it just further backs up the in-compliance previously if that makes sense? whether its right or wrong from riot is another question but not doing it just makes you look like a shitty person. as it would with any employer because when asked to do training if youve done something wrong, even if you know youre in the right with what you said/dealt with it whatever and ik he probably didnt agree w the fact he had to do training, it just looks bad.
edit: ok nvm. there was an email that said he could compete it also said he didnt do the training, he then did it and can now compete the page wasnt updated. so tbh his name is pretty much cleared the effect are still there which ig is why ppl are bringing it up so much
what does Marshall got to do with this? (First time being funny kinda nervous)
Discord