2-0
13-10
13-7
FNC
KRÜ
FNC
KRÜ
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.44 1.81 1.07 | 285 372 199 | 29 19 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 1 0 1 | +11 +10 +1 | 61% 64% 57% | 178 231 125 | 32% 36% 22% | 5 3 2 | 6 3 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.07 1.28 0.87 | 218 217 220 | 20 11 9 | / 18 9 9 / | 11 7 4 | +2 +2 0 | 68% 79% 57% | 152 141 163 | 27% 27% 26% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
1.02 0.91 1.13 | 186 140 233 | 19 8 11 | / 18 9 9 / | 11 8 3 | +1 -1 +2 | 75% 79% 71% | 112 89 135 | 41% 35% 46% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.92 1.09 0.75 | 164 159 170 | 16 9 7 | / 18 6 12 / | 12 10 2 | -2 +3 -5 | 71% 79% 64% | 112 106 117 | 40% 35% 47% | 2 0 2 | 4 3 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.78 0.44 1.11 | 156 106 208 | 15 4 11 | / 17 11 6 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -7 +5 | 71% 57% 86% | 104 74 134 | 23% 9% 31% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.40 1.50 1.30 | 278 306 250 | 26 15 11 | / 19 10 9 / | 9 1 8 | +7 +5 +2 | 82% 86% 79% | 190 219 160 | 30% 35% 24% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.97 1.16 0.79 | 225 239 213 | 20 11 9 | / 22 10 12 / | 6 3 3 | -2 +1 -3 | 79% 71% 86% | 148 156 139 | 44% 38% 53% | 8 4 4 | 4 2 2 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.86 0.90 0.83 | 146 183 110 | 15 10 5 | / 18 10 8 / | 1 0 1 | -3 0 -3 | 61% 64% 57% | 100 121 79 | 28% 32% 21% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.83 0.78 0.87 | 159 142 176 | 16 7 9 | / 18 8 10 / | 2 0 2 | -2 -1 -1 | 64% 64% 64% | 104 97 111 | 26% 24% 28% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.49 0.30 0.68 | 125 81 171 | 12 4 8 | / 22 11 11 / | 4 3 1 | -10 -7 -3 | 57% 64% 50% | 94 66 123 | 35% 29% 39% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.42 0.95 1.21 | 268 330 192 | 65 46 19 | / 52 28 24 / | 6 2 4 | +13 +18 -5 | 66% 66% 67% | 161 192 121 | 26% 26% 26% | 18 13 5 | 19 10 9 | -1 +3 -4 | |
|
1.04 1.07 1.06 | 171 156 203 | 40 21 19 | / 40 22 18 / | 26 18 8 | 0 -1 +1 | 66% 71% 60% | 128 110 150 | 24% 28% 21% | 1 0 1 | 6 2 4 | -5 -2 -3 | |
|
1.14 0.81 0.99 | 198 197 191 | 46 31 15 | / 45 19 26 / | 23 17 6 | +1 +12 -11 | 71% 82% 57% | 133 137 127 | 34% 36% 32% | 5 3 2 | 6 4 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.06 0.89 0.98 | 167 168 173 | 41 23 18 | / 46 24 22 / | 24 18 6 | -5 -1 -4 | 71% 79% 60% | 106 108 103 | 40% 37% 43% | 5 2 3 | 1 1 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.80 0.99 0.88 | 162 125 208 | 36 15 21 | / 44 24 20 / | 9 5 4 | -8 -9 +1 | 69% 66% 73% | 115 96 140 | 26% 24% 27% | 3 1 2 | 5 2 3 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.57 1.16 1.34 | 304 331 265 | 69 36 33 | / 46 19 27 / | 15 5 10 | +23 +17 +6 | 81% 77% 84% | 182 199 168 | 28% 25% 32% | 14 8 6 | 7 4 3 | +7 +4 +3 | |
|
0.98 0.80 0.88 | 156 199 147 | 38 20 18 | / 43 19 24 / | 16 5 11 | -5 +1 -6 | 72% 77% 68% | 123 142 108 | 29% 35% 24% | 4 1 3 | 5 3 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.97 0.76 0.85 | 180 195 167 | 42 21 21 | / 46 18 28 / | 10 4 6 | -4 +3 -7 | 72% 83% 63% | 111 118 105 | 18% 17% 18% | 6 3 3 | 6 2 4 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.81 0.89 0.85 | 169 137 189 | 40 15 25 | / 47 19 28 / | 19 11 8 | -7 -4 -3 | 72% 73% 71% | 117 99 131 | 30% 27% 32% | 4 2 2 | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.73 0.75 0.74 | 146 159 136 | 36 18 18 | / 46 22 24 / | 8 2 6 | -10 -4 -6 | 69% 70% 68% | 91 103 83 | 16% 26% 8% | 8 3 5 | 10 2 8 | -2 +1 -3 |
FNC
KRÜ
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.61 0.90 | 333 411 202 | 23 18 5 | / 15 10 5 / | 2 1 1 | +8 +8 0 | 74% 75% 71% | 195 234 127 | 37% 32% 50% | 10 7 3 | 4 2 2 | +6 +5 +1 | |
|
1.27 1.28 1.26 | 171 154 202 | 11 7 4 | / 8 4 4 / | 9 6 3 | +3 +3 0 | 74% 83% 57% | 124 113 144 | 29% 35% 21% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.09 1.29 0.73 | 179 182 174 | 12 8 4 | / 12 6 6 / | 2 2 0 | 0 +2 -2 | 68% 75% 57% | 132 140 119 | 44% 50% 35% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.05 1.22 0.76 | 211 235 172 | 14 11 3 | / 12 6 6 / | 4 2 2 | +2 +5 -3 | 58% 75% 29% | 142 159 114 | 38% 43% 25% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.98 1.10 0.76 | 145 160 122 | 10 7 3 | / 12 7 5 / | 9 7 2 | -2 0 -2 | 63% 75% 43% | 88 98 71 | 44% 44% 44% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.69 2.59 1.17 | 382 541 289 | 28 15 13 | / 13 3 10 / | 0 0 0 | +15 +12 +3 | 79% 86% 75% | 206 300 151 | 32% 24% 50% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.70 0.67 0.72 | 146 71 191 | 8 1 7 | / 15 4 11 / | 8 5 3 | -7 -3 -4 | 74% 71% 75% | 111 58 142 | 26% 14% 30% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.66 0.88 0.53 | 151 178 137 | 9 4 5 | / 14 5 9 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -1 -4 | 74% 86% 67% | 96 117 84 | 17% 27% 10% | 1 1 0 | 5 1 4 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
0.52 0.56 0.50 | 138 121 150 | 8 3 5 | / 15 5 10 / | 2 2 0 | -7 -2 -5 | 58% 100% 33% | 93 76 104 | 13% 7% 18% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.52 0.82 0.34 | 108 147 86 | 6 3 3 | / 13 3 10 / | 4 1 3 | -7 0 -7 | 63% 71% 58% | 79 98 69 | 38% 50% 31% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
FNC
KRÜ
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.03 1.10 0.94 | 218 203 239 | 16 11 5 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 5 2 | +1 +4 -3 | 81% 92% 67% | 153 153 153 | 27% 30% 23% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.95 1.19 0.63 | 169 208 118 | 12 8 4 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 3 1 | -4 0 -4 | 71% 83% 56% | 114 140 79 | 34% 33% 36% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.84 0.53 1.24 | 125 87 178 | 9 3 6 | / 14 9 5 / | 6 5 1 | -5 -6 +1 | 57% 50% 67% | 98 72 133 | 17% 22% 14% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.72 1.00 | 151 90 234 | 9 3 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 2 2 | -6 -4 -2 | 67% 67% 67% | 114 77 163 | 15% 8% 20% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.77 0.76 0.78 | 187 199 172 | 13 9 4 | / 19 9 10 / | 3 1 2 | -6 0 -6 | 67% 58% 78% | 107 106 110 | 12% 8% 18% | 3 3 0 | 9 5 4 | -6 -2 -4 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.51 1.41 1.58 | 304 310 301 | 21 10 11 | / 11 6 5 / | 9 2 7 | +10 +4 +6 | 86% 78% 92% | 205 188 218 | 17% 15% 19% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.48 1.70 1.32 | 237 276 208 | 20 10 10 | / 10 4 6 / | 7 3 4 | +10 +6 +4 | 90% 89% 92% | 152 182 130 | 29% 29% 29% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.18 1.58 0.89 | 242 336 172 | 18 11 7 | / 13 5 8 / | 6 2 4 | +5 +6 -1 | 95% 100% 92% | 136 184 100 | 13% 15% 10% | 4 3 1 | 2 0 2 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
0.64 0.34 0.86 | 140 106 167 | 12 4 8 | / 14 7 7 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -3 +1 | 76% 67% 83% | 76 63 85 | 6% 19% 0% | 5 1 4 | 2 0 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.52 0.31 0.67 | 81 73 88 | 6 2 4 | / 11 6 5 / | 3 3 0 | -5 -4 -1 | 67% 67% 67% | 74 57 87 | 21% 25% 20% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
FNATIC SUCKS
KRU 2-1
edit : lol how did i bait and end up getting this pred right
Think Fnatic are insane, but KRU has so much confidence (granted they beat SEN, who were the "favorites")
They weren’t favourites at all
Everyone said it’s their downfall only Sen fans and a few fans said redemption
Maybe they will be overconfident? Beating sentinels is a massive win but I still think fnatic are by far the favourites for this matchup
I was saying Fnatic doesnt suck at all. They put up a great fight and im proud of my bois. If they won Haven, it would have been a 2:0, Kru pulled great comeback and were better on spilt. Sad, Kru were better, still props to Fnatic
If keznit has a good match and derke not, it's GG for KRU
But then again, if Derke is on fire and Keznit not, it's gg for FNATIC
qué sucede cuando un objeto con una fuerza imparable choca contra un objeto inamobible?
La paradoja de la fuerza irresistible (o imparable) es una paradoja clásica que se formula así: ¿Qué pasaría si una fuerza imparable chocara contra un objeto inamovible? ... Es lógicamente imposible la existencia de los objetos (una fuerza imparable y un objeto inamovible) en un mismo universo al mismo tiempo.
Un agujero negro cumple ambas y las leyes de la fisica no aplican dentro del horizonte de sucesos. Es literal, incluso capaz de hacer desaparecer particulas... Entonces una fuerza irresistible se puede enfrentar a una fuerza imparable? Si, es el funcionamiento basico de un agujero negro. A comparativa extena nivel micro, ni un imparable foton puede escapar, a nivel macro, que pasaria si colisiona con un cuásar? Podría escapar al menos 1 foton?
La respuesta es sencilla y la dijo Superman en un cómic: aunque físicamente no es posible que exista ninguno de los objetos (porque no es posible que algo tenga una masa infinita). La solución a este problema es que cuando un objeto imparable choca contra uno inamovible, "ambos ceden" es decir inevitablemente terminarán atravesándose el uno al otro.
EMEA teams have respect for KRU because in scrims they have shown to be very good, but in official games, they weren't able to show their full potential due to nerves and self-doubt. After beating SENTINELS they may have more confidence in themselves and may show the KRU of the scrims. So I expect a close match, VAMOS KRU CARAJOOO
va a ser una partida MUY peleada, todo depende del mental de KRU. Si agarramos a derke y boaster volando bajo como agarramos a Tenz volando bajo la partida pasada, es 2-1 para Kru. Confio en que Nagz pegue con la op, mazino lurkee bien como siempre y Keznit amase. GO KRU
rn KRU represents BR, ARG, the hole LATAM community. Sending zombs home was amazing, thanks for not letting them disrespect us like this. LETS GO KRU
if nagzet keeps missing his op shots and derke keeps playing well fnatic should 2-1
FNC 2-0 KRU
boaster starts dancing and causes a distraction while derke kills everyone
ngl this champions has been all about underdogs
can go anyway
rooting for fnatic
Obviously no chance for KRU here
FNC 2-0
Sentinels just trolling and underestimate opponent
Fnatic will roll KRÜ, this is not an NA team my LATAM friends. Fnatix easy 2-0.
Honestly, In a selfish way, I want KRU to either get stomped or win it all. The latter would be preferred. The way they are playing now who knows, taking down SEN, FNC, AND gmb would be an insane run to meet Ascend or Liquid. Good luck to them they have a crazy run ahead. Let's see how they do!
This first map would be already over like 13-8 if boaster didnt keep whiffing
Icebox should be ez fnatic but split could easily go KRU's way
Either way we either get all EMEA semis (based) or LATAM (still based)
Bro delz1k is completely unknown to public but what a support player he is
Wtf were those map vetos.. why does teams that were second in their group have an advantage in banning and picking their maop first. Shouldn't it be the other way? They showed worse results, so they have to prove themselves and not have an advantage.
maybe Derke will carry fnatic all the way to the finals, and it would be interesting to watch fnc x tl
Remember when people said LATAM was the worst region before Reykjavik?
Look at them now
Latam is one of the worst region tho
Kru is just way above the rest of latam teams, look at SA lcq
edit,there is 2 of this comment bcs i lag when i posted this lol
Latam is one of the worst regions in the world tho
KRU is just a whole different level to the rest of latam teams, look at SA lcq
Kru have confident to win gambit.if they unlucky Kru will lose.good luck.fnatic fan boy crying now =9
VAMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSS
I SHOULD'VE BELIEVED MORE BUT IDC THAT MY PICKEMS ARE BOOMED
steel is a prophet 😲
are Kru Esports wants to be like SK Gaming in 2016? well don't sleep on LATAM
ggwp kru esports, nt fnc.... 3 Emea and 1 latam team in semis searchingNa kekw
These flukers shouldn't have even been here
Fluke to Iceland over Gambit
They would've lost Ascent 3rd map in that last game
Fluke to Champions just because Gambit won for them an extra EMEA slot
Yeah sure suddenly undermine the loser to make the winner look back. Maybe it's time you accept for once that the minor region team just played better
KRÜ Esports is an Argentine organization focused on the esports and content creation scenes with the goal of bringing this world to a wider audience with the support of Sergio "Kun" Agüero as founder and helping with the connection between the traditional and virtual sports scene.
Chilean-Argentine. The owner is Argentine but they are taxed in Chile and most of their players are Chilean. Now Kun will build a Gaming Office in Argentina for better quality training (proximity) with Brazilian teams.
Es LATAM. con localización en Argentina, lo que pasa que los gringos no ponen la bandera de la union de estados Latinoamérica como ponen la de la Unión Europe-
Bajo esa premisa, las empresas de Elon Musk serian Sudafricanas y no Norteamericanas.
El club como entidad legal seria chileno-argentina, ya que como empresa esta constituida en ambos paises y ocupa como sede tributaria principal Chile, con tributacion tambien en parte en Argentina ya que el club tambien tiene presencia en ahí porque abarca varios juegos. Ahora, todo el equipo de Valorant (incluido coach), viven en Chile, asi que ahi es donde se localiza y en un futuro (segun dijo Kun), tendran gaming office en Argentina para poder ir a realizar semanas de entrenamiento contra brasileños con mayor comodidad (como la bootcamp de G2 en Alemania).
Respecto a la representatividad, es algo subjetivo, por alcance cultural obviamente representa a toda LATAM, pero en terminos legales y de taxes sigue siendo chileno-argentina.
If only Fnatic focused on playing good Valorant instead of being goofy infront of the camera and on Twitter
They plaxed good Valorant they were dominating on haven and on icebox. Too bad they choked the haven game
All this is not for long, everything is changing, there are no eternal ones!