Acend vs Gambit
2-1 ACEND
ACE
GMB
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.50 1.26 1.85 | 301 239 394 | 23 11 12 | / 13 9 4 / | 5 1 4 | +10 +2 +8 | 75% 67% 88% | 168 144 205 | 25% 23% 27% | 5 3 2 | 2 2 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.48 1.73 1.10 | 272 326 192 | 19 14 5 | / 12 8 4 / | 5 3 2 | +7 +6 +1 | 75% 58% 100% | 179 207 138 | 25% 28% 20% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.98 0.45 1.77 | 171 82 307 | 13 3 10 | / 12 9 3 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -6 +7 | 75% 67% 88% | 90 58 139 | 18% 30% 13% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.90 0.55 1.43 | 144 102 209 | 9 3 6 | / 11 8 3 / | 5 4 1 | -2 -5 +3 | 80% 75% 88% | 79 68 96 | 23% 33% 19% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.52 0.47 0.58 | 129 157 88 | 8 5 3 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 3 2 | -7 -5 -2 | 65% 50% 88% | 88 114 50 | 13% 11% 22% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.10 1.48 | 256 229 276 | 18 6 12 | / 13 7 6 / | 4 3 1 | +5 -1 +6 | 80% 75% 83% | 149 121 167 | 24% 17% 29% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.03 0.35 1.48 | 234 132 303 | 16 3 13 | / 15 7 8 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -4 +5 | 60% 38% 75% | 159 75 216 | 28% 13% 34% | 2 1 1 | 4 3 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.69 0.35 0.91 | 161 117 191 | 12 4 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 4 0 4 | -3 -4 +1 | 70% 50% 83% | 85 29 123 | 56% 25% 64% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.61 0.53 0.66 | 146 137 152 | 10 4 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 2 3 | -5 -3 -2 | 65% 63% 67% | 75 56 88 | 15% 10% 17% | 2 0 2 | 4 2 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.56 0.21 0.80 | 108 86 123 | 7 2 5 | / 15 8 7 / | 5 1 4 | -8 -6 -2 | 55% 38% 67% | 75 65 82 | 27% 33% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 1.59 1.37 | 286 251 330 | 63 31 32 | / 40 26 14 / | 6 3 3 | +23 +5 +18 | 75% 69% 85% | 155 144 169 | 20% 22% 17% | 12 6 6 | 6 4 2 | +6 +2 +4 | |
|
1.13 1.12 1.13 | 213 222 208 | 47 28 19 | / 38 24 14 / | 14 8 6 | +9 +4 +5 | 67% 60% 77% | 140 143 137 | 32% 33% 30% | 4 3 1 | 8 5 3 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.75 1.41 1.03 | 237 224 245 | 50 25 25 | / 43 30 13 / | 18 7 11 | +7 -5 +12 | 70% 57% 88% | 138 148 126 | 18% 16% 20% | 5 4 1 | 6 3 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.82 1.16 0.97 | 170 138 206 | 39 19 20 | / 37 24 13 / | 16 6 10 | +2 -5 +7 | 62% 57% 69% | 102 94 114 | 27% 22% 34% | 5 3 2 | 6 5 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.52 1.05 0.75 | 128 86 189 | 23 7 16 | / 42 27 15 / | 25 14 11 | -19 -20 +1 | 75% 71% 81% | 87 62 120 | 21% 15% 25% | 7 2 5 | 2 0 2 | +5 +2 +3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.71 1.27 1.03 | 213 187 235 | 46 15 31 | / 42 23 19 / | 12 5 7 | +4 -8 +12 | 75% 69% 80% | 127 103 145 | 24% 22% 25% | 7 4 3 | 4 2 2 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.86 1.08 0.99 | 206 216 206 | 44 18 26 | / 45 23 22 / | 13 5 8 | -1 -5 +4 | 61% 54% 66% | 127 139 118 | 28% 36% 21% | 8 2 6 | 12 5 7 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.64 1.23 0.98 | 200 146 242 | 44 14 30 | / 45 22 23 / | 11 3 8 | -1 -8 +7 | 61% 46% 71% | 131 88 163 | 31% 33% 29% | 6 3 3 | 5 4 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.58 0.94 0.79 | 160 126 195 | 34 11 23 | / 44 21 23 / | 15 6 9 | -10 -10 0 | 69% 62% 74% | 104 77 123 | 20% 13% 23% | 2 0 2 | 5 2 3 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.53 0.87 0.72 | 166 133 190 | 32 11 21 | / 47 24 23 / | 17 4 13 | -15 -13 -2 | 62% 46% 74% | 99 79 114 | 29% 22% 33% | 5 2 3 | 7 2 5 | -2 0 -2 |
ACE
GMB
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.20 1.54 | 313 261 361 | 25 10 15 | / 17 9 8 / | 2 1 1 | +8 +1 +7 | 70% 55% 83% | 185 166 202 | 24% 29% 18% | 6 2 4 | 4 2 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.06 0.68 1.40 | 224 191 255 | 18 7 11 | / 17 10 7 / | 6 1 5 | +1 -3 +4 | 65% 45% 83% | 143 126 158 | 28% 62% 16% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.99 0.60 1.35 | 224 147 296 | 19 6 13 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 2 3 | +2 -3 +5 | 52% 45% 58% | 131 74 183 | 35% 33% 36% | 1 0 1 | 5 3 2 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.61 0.62 0.60 | 132 110 153 | 8 3 5 | / 20 10 10 / | 9 4 5 | -12 -7 -5 | 70% 64% 75% | 103 84 121 | 21% 15% 26% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.43 0.47 0.38 | 67 89 49 | 5 3 2 | / 17 9 8 / | 8 4 4 | -12 -6 -6 | 43% 36% 50% | 54 74 36 | 33% 25% 50% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.40 1.53 1.26 | 288 344 227 | 23 14 9 | / 15 9 6 / | 6 2 4 | +8 +5 +3 | 70% 67% 73% | 164 201 123 | 33% 38% 21% | 7 2 5 | 6 3 3 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.11 0.69 1.56 | 228 117 351 | 18 5 13 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 3 4 | +4 -3 +7 | 78% 67% 91% | 142 77 213 | 16% 4% 23% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.07 0.95 1.21 | 194 186 204 | 18 9 9 | / 15 9 6 / | 4 1 3 | +3 0 +3 | 65% 58% 73% | 115 108 123 | 31% 43% 21% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.98 0.68 1.31 | 207 199 217 | 18 8 10 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 1 4 | +3 -2 +5 | 83% 83% 82% | 116 116 116 | 28% 33% 23% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.76 1.02 | 163 140 189 | 11 5 6 | / 16 10 6 / | 12 4 8 | -5 -5 0 | 70% 50% 91% | 99 104 93 | 16% 17% 15% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 |
ACE
GMB
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.79 1.97 1.44 | 374 412 298 | 25 18 7 | / 11 8 3 / | 1 0 1 | +14 +10 +4 | 83% 83% 83% | 188 210 143 | 15% 12% 25% | 5 4 1 | 0 0 0 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
1.57 1.09 2.52 | 358 320 436 | 24 13 11 | / 11 10 1 / | 7 3 4 | +13 +3 +10 | 83% 75% 100% | 189 202 162 | 14% 10% 26% | 4 3 1 | 2 2 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.07 0.71 1.81 | 143 80 270 | 11 5 6 | / 7 6 1 / | 3 1 2 | +4 -1 +5 | 72% 67% 83% | 91 62 147 | 28% 15% 42% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.92 1.03 0.71 | 142 186 55 | 9 8 1 | / 9 7 2 / | 4 3 1 | 0 +1 -1 | 78% 75% 83% | 109 143 43 | 39% 42% 25% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.76 0.41 1.46 | 109 48 235 | 6 1 5 | / 11 9 2 / | 11 6 5 | -5 -8 +3 | 78% 75% 83% | 75 37 152 | 17% 0% 33% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.93 0.38 1.20 | 222 131 269 | 14 2 12 | / 15 6 9 / | 2 2 0 | -1 -4 +3 | 56% 50% 58% | 138 112 150 | 22% 30% 18% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.80 0.43 0.98 | 173 88 216 | 10 2 8 | / 15 6 9 / | 4 0 4 | -5 -4 -1 | 56% 33% 67% | 119 64 146 | 34% 50% 31% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.25 1.03 | 177 109 212 | 10 1 9 | / 14 6 8 / | 3 1 2 | -4 -5 +1 | 61% 33% 75% | 117 55 148 | 18% 0% 24% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.58 0.44 0.66 | 107 131 97 | 6 2 4 | / 15 6 9 / | 3 1 2 | -9 -4 -5 | 61% 50% 67% | 87 108 76 | 44% 50% 42% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.55 0.30 0.68 | 173 142 190 | 9 2 7 | / 16 6 10 / | 1 0 1 | -7 -4 -3 | 44% 33% 50% | 113 93 124 | 33% 33% 33% | 2 1 1 | 6 2 4 | -4 -1 -3 |
Imagine this being NaVi vs Gambit
I already watched enough navi vs gambit in cs :/
1 more win, upper or lower bracket. Berlin Waiting for Both team. Turkish Jett Vs Russian Jett. Lets Go.
if redgar doesnt go bot mode gambit win this, if its a 4v5 like usual acend take it
my pickems are acend winnin this , but i want to see a good match , it will be interesting if gambit win ,
Gambit absolutely CAN win this. But will they? Not sure - they still seems nervous playing against EU teams. Even the game they won against Guild is good example - some of the Gambit players played worse then their average level and did some stupid mistakes. Which indicates that they indeed shaking too much
They won Guild with Chronicle having an off game, if he performs at his avg level Gambit have a high chance of winning this imo
First of all, let's not forget that Acend can give NaVi to 1 map point and make the match more difficult. Considering that Gambit is a better team than NaVi, Gambit's probability of winning this match will not be low. Although Acend was strong, Navi game didn't give me hope (Map 2) because they managed to win most rounds with extra starxo and cNed performance. But still Acend manages to win 2-1 or lose 2-1.
I'm undecided.
I think NaVi really worked hard, when they played against Gambit they were new team and they lost to gambit 13-10 on icebox so i think this logic pointless.
They weren't a new team, they literally had 1 roster change to a 2 months old roster(crab1k->cloud), if they were a completely new team back then they wouldn't have qualified for EMEA imo
This game will be close, only if Gambit stop choking against EU teams on real matches
He's saying the team who loses is highly likely to beat the team they meet in the lower bracket.
I HOPE THIS MATCH DOESN'T DISAPPOINT, IF IT'S A STOMP FOR EITHER TEAM I'LL BE PISSED
I doubt that gold players are allowed to participate in vct man, you don't qualify anywhere personally
t1 team valo : 130K qualifier playoff
T1 csgo : 160 not even playoff (group)
VALULRANT KEKW KEKW
wtf was that round. TK, boombot kill, guy standing in a viper molly for 5 seconds. is this a seeding match?
acend just straight up out aimed and outplayed them on defense,on attack it looked pretty even tbh
yeah , gambit couldve capitalized on the lead , even if its a 7-5 half and if gambit won the 2nd pistol , 9-5 , and couldve probably taken this map , i dont want a stomp , i hope gambit win 2nd map and then a 3rd map goes to OT , idc who wins xD
That 9th round by Gambit was by far the most absurdly awful entry on to a site I've ever seen.
Icebox is very winnable for Gambit, it's one of their best maps. Let's see what happens.
i always thought Redgar was their weakest link.
turns out i'm wrong (i think)
Does EU have a good reyna? I wanna know cuz the Reynas in this lobby are awful.
Idk maybe screaM.
If ur asking including content creators then I'll say SoMarcus.
I am just curious because NA has TenZ and Asuna, but I don't see any EU Reynas. Only insane Jetts.
They are throwing so many rounds. Especially when they have man advantage. Smh
I did not expect this Icebox to be so one-sided. Wow. Grats to Acend for the Berlin qual!