2-0 TL
NAVI
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.59 1.16 2.07 | 286 240 338 | 25 11 14 | / 13 9 4 / | 8 2 6 | +12 +2 +10 | 78% 58% 100% | 186 162 213 | 46% 56% 39% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
1.39 0.52 2.34 | 300 151 464 | 23 7 16 | / 15 10 5 / | 7 2 5 | +8 -3 +11 | 74% 50% 100% | 187 107 275 | 20% 20% 21% | 3 0 3 | 1 1 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.96 0.95 0.96 | 175 174 177 | 14 7 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 2 3 | -2 -3 +1 | 74% 58% 91% | 92 103 79 | 24% 23% 27% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.76 0.24 1.32 | 187 126 256 | 16 4 12 | / 18 12 6 / | 3 2 1 | -2 -8 +6 | 78% 58% 100% | 127 85 172 | 33% 17% 53% | 5 1 4 | 2 2 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
0.47 0.23 0.73 | 97 69 129 | 6 2 4 | / 17 11 6 / | 9 3 6 | -11 -9 -2 | 70% 50% 91% | 73 59 88 | 17% 13% 21% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 1.28 1.19 | 269 310 232 | 20 11 9 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 2 3 | +4 +1 +3 | 78% 64% 92% | 171 176 168 | 37% 28% 46% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.24 0.58 1.84 | 202 125 275 | 16 3 13 | / 15 11 4 / | 8 5 3 | +1 -8 +9 | 87% 73% 100% | 144 99 185 | 29% 14% 38% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.92 0.17 1.62 | 224 112 327 | 19 5 14 | / 18 12 6 / | 3 0 3 | +1 -7 +8 | 65% 55% 75% | 149 74 218 | 34% 27% 36% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.35 1.15 | 199 172 224 | 17 6 11 | / 17 11 6 / | 2 2 0 | 0 -5 +5 | 65% 55% 75% | 104 79 128 | 25% 33% 15% | 5 3 2 | 6 6 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.44 0.22 0.65 | 85 70 99 | 7 2 5 | / 18 11 7 / | 6 3 3 | -11 -9 -2 | 61% 64% 58% | 60 47 72 | 33% 29% 35% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.94 1.37 1.17 | 275 276 274 | 66 30 36 | / 52 30 22 / | 11 5 6 | +14 0 +14 | 81% 72% 89% | 162 152 172 | 32% 27% 37% | 12 2 10 | 7 5 2 | +5 -3 +8 | |
|
0.61 1.67 1.16 | 240 168 312 | 59 18 41 | / 47 29 18 / | 18 5 13 | +12 -11 +23 | 79% 66% 91% | 158 115 197 | 32% 42% 28% | 9 3 6 | 11 10 1 | -2 -7 +5 | |
|
0.56 1.66 1.13 | 244 166 318 | 57 19 38 | / 46 28 18 / | 10 3 7 | +11 -9 +20 | 64% 41% 86% | 139 88 187 | 14% 15% 14% | 7 1 6 | 5 3 2 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
0.66 0.86 0.77 | 133 108 161 | 30 11 19 | / 47 26 21 / | 23 9 14 | -17 -15 -2 | 73% 63% 83% | 85 69 99 | 25% 20% 30% | 2 2 0 | 4 2 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.33 0.74 0.55 | 128 91 158 | 28 9 19 | / 53 29 24 / | 23 7 16 | -25 -20 -5 | 72% 59% 83% | 85 63 105 | 26% 17% 34% | 3 1 2 | 7 3 4 | -4 -2 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.85 1.60 1.21 | 253 204 304 | 60 26 34 | / 50 32 18 / | 14 2 12 | +10 -6 +16 | 72% 63% 81% | 174 148 202 | 37% 47% 31% | 6 2 4 | 4 1 3 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.08 1.21 1.14 | 257 253 260 | 58 29 29 | / 48 30 18 / | 14 6 8 | +10 -1 +11 | 72% 57% 88% | 159 153 166 | 27% 26% 28% | 6 3 3 | 10 9 1 | -4 -6 +2 | |
|
0.44 1.51 0.95 | 169 96 254 | 43 10 33 | / 46 32 14 / | 11 6 5 | -3 -22 +19 | 75% 60% 91% | 108 75 144 | 25% 23% 27% | 6 0 6 | 1 1 0 | +5 -1 +6 | |
|
0.65 1.14 0.88 | 166 149 188 | 41 18 23 | / 46 31 15 / | 19 9 10 | -5 -13 +8 | 75% 71% 78% | 101 101 100 | 34% 40% 30% | 4 1 3 | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.60 0.97 0.77 | 175 167 186 | 43 20 23 | / 50 31 19 / | 12 6 6 | -7 -11 +4 | 64% 51% 78% | 101 95 108 | 22% 30% 15% | 12 5 7 | 14 12 2 | -2 -7 +5 |
NAVI
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 1.14 1.66 | 319 301 333 | 22 8 14 | / 14 7 7 / | 3 1 2 | +8 +1 +7 | 80% 75% 83% | 175 135 202 | 26% 13% 35% | 6 1 5 | 3 2 1 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
0.95 0.25 1.42 | 222 141 277 | 15 3 12 | / 14 8 6 / | 1 0 1 | +1 -5 +6 | 60% 38% 75% | 124 75 158 | 7% 8% 6% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.88 0.18 1.35 | 187 93 250 | 13 2 11 | / 14 8 6 / | 5 1 4 | -1 -6 +5 | 80% 75% 83% | 121 49 169 | 26% 40% 23% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.71 0.26 1.01 | 168 91 220 | 12 2 10 | / 17 8 9 / | 10 1 9 | -5 -6 +1 | 80% 63% 92% | 109 55 146 | 29% 9% 40% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.35 0.26 0.41 | 84 101 74 | 5 2 3 | / 16 8 8 / | 6 2 4 | -11 -6 -5 | 75% 75% 75% | 66 75 59 | 24% 21% 27% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.54 1.34 1.84 | 293 250 359 | 21 11 10 | / 14 9 5 / | 5 1 4 | +7 +2 +5 | 85% 75% 100% | 193 184 205 | 36% 50% 24% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.21 1.10 1.38 | 261 235 303 | 19 10 9 | / 13 9 4 / | 3 0 3 | +6 +1 +5 | 70% 50% 100% | 137 134 142 | 24% 28% 19% | 1 1 0 | 7 6 1 | -6 -5 -1 | |
|
0.90 0.42 1.62 | 167 123 235 | 13 5 8 | / 13 11 2 / | 4 3 1 | 0 -6 +6 | 70% 58% 88% | 94 85 107 | 22% 42% 15% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.85 0.82 0.89 | 163 181 139 | 11 7 4 | / 14 10 4 / | 4 2 2 | -3 -3 0 | 60% 50% 75% | 112 118 101 | 23% 22% 25% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.81 0.33 1.53 | 137 70 239 | 11 3 8 | / 13 11 2 / | 2 1 1 | -2 -8 +6 | 60% 42% 88% | 81 54 120 | 19% 14% 22% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
NAVI
TL
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.32 1.51 1.12 | 320 409 232 | 28 18 10 | / 20 11 9 / | 5 2 3 | +8 +7 +1 | 83% 83% 83% | 186 229 143 | 37% 42% 29% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.04 0.80 1.27 | 211 198 225 | 19 9 10 | / 17 10 7 / | 2 1 1 | +2 -1 +3 | 58% 33% 83% | 106 78 135 | 12% 13% 12% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.98 0.34 1.63 | 247 144 351 | 21 5 16 | / 20 12 8 / | 5 2 3 | +1 -7 +8 | 79% 67% 92% | 161 111 211 | 26% 30% 24% | 5 2 3 | 8 7 1 | -3 -5 +2 | |
|
0.93 0.64 1.22 | 141 48 235 | 11 2 9 | / 15 8 7 / | 12 5 7 | -4 -6 +2 | 71% 58% 83% | 94 31 157 | 27% 10% 32% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.49 0.49 0.48 | 118 113 124 | 10 5 5 | / 19 10 9 / | 4 3 1 | -9 -5 -4 | 67% 67% 67% | 77 73 80 | 31% 25% 37% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 1.27 1.31 | 245 246 246 | 21 11 10 | / 15 9 6 / | 9 3 6 | +6 +2 +4 | 92% 92% 92% | 145 167 124 | 46% 43% 50% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.21 1.00 1.41 | 243 243 243 | 20 10 10 | / 18 11 7 / | 6 1 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 67% 58% 75% | 183 181 185 | 40% 55% 30% | 2 2 0 | 2 0 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
1.00 0.88 1.12 | 240 220 261 | 19 8 11 | / 19 11 8 / | 6 4 2 | 0 -3 +3 | 67% 58% 75% | 165 151 180 | 22% 23% 21% | 2 2 0 | 3 3 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.79 0.41 1.16 | 169 95 245 | 16 4 12 | / 18 10 8 / | 1 0 1 | -2 -6 +4 | 75% 67% 83% | 96 73 119 | 28% 42% 21% | 4 0 4 | 0 0 0 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
0.71 0.59 0.83 | 164 150 180 | 15 7 8 | / 19 10 9 / | 6 2 4 | -4 -3 -1 | 67% 50% 83% | 89 87 92 | 20% 37% 11% | 5 1 4 | 5 4 1 | 0 -3 +3 |
Guys, I feel like you're all gonna jinx it for liquid with these 2-0's
Navi 2-0
Navi 2-0, clearly nobody watches CIS and doesn't realize how strong these cis teams are
2-0 Liquid are playing the same as the grand finals and Liquid 2-1 if not
2-1 Liquid, It's gonna be the same as the last emea event where they face a turkish team and lost the first map, just to see how they play
to ez for s1mple and electronic....
If only navi had them for valorant.
TL 2-0 Navi; haven't watched Navi but I think TL is a safer bet just by looking at the region
the op is not the same as the awp in csgo
Have you seen s1mple use the op in val? he missed basic flicks because of how different it is, you can't use it like you can in cs
Maybe he would be good with the OP in val but he couldn't do any of the crazy shit he does with the AWP in cs
Yeah I know. Its kinda ironic because I wrote a post the other day with very similar points as yours.
Well, he was banned for it twice, never has a bad game, and always outstats everybody in the server, seems like a cheater to me.
In my opinion s1mple has beeen hacking for years in the CS scene, the dude has stats noone ever had in the game, not even close, he was already banned twice, from ESL and a VAC ban, his crosshair has a mechanical and suspicious shake when he shoots and he has always been a toxic person with a untrhustworthy personality and character. The thing is, people are just too scared to acuse "the best player of all time".
he got banned in valorant, and again he states that he didn't cheat, even after getting banned:
https://win.gg/news/7686/csgo-pro-s1mple-gets-banned-in-valorant-after-hitting-immortal-rank
His bans in CS:
https://win.gg/news/6699/s1mple-admits-to-sharing-a-vac-banned-account-with-friend (VAC BAN, "Friend's account" lol
Wow! I really hope Stewie2K and FalleN prepared, s1mple and B1t are on another level right now! So is electronic but b1t is looking a bit better rn! Hopefully EliGE is on point too, oh fuck wrong game
Ez 2-0 for TL Navi won't know why did they even join Valorant
Any naffers?
BTW facing Acend next. These guys are dead
imagine NAVI wins Berlin and right after NAVI drops roster because they think Valarante is to ez and not worth having a Team in this Game
NaVi 2-1 legit. TL didn't look that good. And we don't know what form of Liquid they'll bring. Half the time they are KEKQUID and the other is POGQUID. But they are way too inconsistent and NaVi have the fragging power to make this upset happen.
TL can def take this 2-1 but I want to see the upset because there is serious potential in this NaVi roster.
Lol cry harder
"TL didnt look that good"
you didnt watch the games against fnatic and Giants Gaming clearly
Dude 1st be respectful
2nd Liquid is so inestable, they change igl too soon and we dont know what to expect
3rd we dont know what about to think about no pressure (NaVi)
2-0 for TL
NAVi is not the as structured and experienced as Liquid
GL tho for NaVi
Ez Liquid, so sad for CIS there was no any possible worst bracket for them
liquid is not the strongest team here, and no one knows what to expect from navi
2-1 navi probably
NaVi have their first bootcamp while still on honeymoon. Probably they could take atleast one map from TL.
TL2-1NaVi
This is not an endorsement to gamble, but here: https://gg.bet/en/esports/match/5:f78aec96-e22e-4e35-9630-c63c7e0ac99c
This is a tough match for me, as I like both teams and I want Navi to do well and help grow the CIS region.
My heart wants Navi, my brain says Liquid.
Navi's roster is no pressure, what means that its should be easy for tl if they have a good day, cuz their are too inestable
is navi good? why are the odds so one sided? unbiased answers from people who actually watched cis please
they're a bit reckless, but they've had a few extra weeks to prepare under an org name now, so extra talent coaching could be all a team needs.
Lots of people will say Gambit 5-0'd them which makes them shit, but I just think Gambit is one of the top contenders for EMEA after falling just short (to fnatic, the 2nd place finisher) last playoffs. I don't think NAVI qual by any means, but they won't get double swept, or at least, shouldn't.
⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⡷⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀Are you winning son?
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠖⠒⠒⠒⢤⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀
⢸⠀⠀⣀⢤⣼⣀⡠⠤⠤⠼⠤⡄⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀
⢸⠀⠀⠑⡤⠤⡒⠒⠒⡊⠙⡏⠀⢀⠀⡇⠀
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠇⠀⣀⣀⣀⣀⢀⠧⠟⠁⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠸⣀⠀⠀⠈⢉⠟⠓⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢱⡖⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⢺⠧⢄⣀⠀⠀⣀⣀⠀⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠀⣠⠃⢸⠀⠀⠈⠉⡽⠿⠯⡆⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⣰⠁⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠣⠀⠀⢸⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⢇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡌⠀⠈⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⠃⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇
⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠷
watch scream bottomfrag and make 15 embarrassing jett plays, but no1 dares to bring it up
jokes on u, anyone with a sensible mind knows lulquid ain't fit to qualify to Berlin.
Damn it's rare to see BOT arch going positive even when they are wining...
not with that aim :DDD he is literally shaking like 5x more than kjaerbye and thats bad
He was bad in CS:GO. Nothing changed... Imagine if they had a solid player.
bad CSGO players are good at valorant. Not sure what you are saying here
I think it will be hilarious, I will change teams if it happens.
Edit: But I hope not.
click on the 3 lines on the top right, choose settings, then u will find team flair, then put your favourite team in there (liquid)
these second halfs are always one sided
ok liquid, just don't choke again.
А в этой катке не было смысла так-то
Нави победили, ну а дальше их ждет Асенд - сильнейшая команда в Европе и это как-бы очевидно кто выиграет, у них топ игрок на операторе который выносит всех нахуй
В итоге и Ликвиды и Нави отправятся в нижнюю сетку начиная с одинакового раунда, и ни те ни другие не получат абсолютно никакого преимущества
ti daje ne ponimaesh pochemy xyinu nesesh KEKW prichem tut igra vs acend voobshe, ochevidno chto oni proigraut im i shansov malo
well, my pickem is fucked now, but I don't care because i love when upset like this happen. Gratz to Navi
So I win you a new team, Liquid sucks even in valulrant lmao is there something these guys do right?
Is there someone who would disagree with this very sensible assessment? Even most Liquid fans would be d’accord I s’ppose…
Eu kids calling cis overrated, Iceland team just lost to a new stage 3 team
its common for liquid on split they go 3-9 they make a come back and they lose at 11-13