If Optic lose this game, I'm convinced Masters 1 was a fluke tournament
still i do think meta has changed a lot since master 1, with fade, neon, and JETT NERF first time on international LAN
but optic was basically the only team that was using neon then. Like we still saw jett a lot.
im saying that optic and loud doing successful then could have been a fluke due to the fact that the meta was completely new at the time, and now that teams have adapted they might do shit now
m1 was a fluke tourney cuz no good eu teams/subs/or travel restricts were there
zeta wouldnt make it out of groups cuz of fnc, drx
g2 shit team wouldnt make it out of groups tho
fpx would roll as 1st seed
they wont and nothing is a fLuKe tOurnAment, teams improve or do you want to call every tournament a fluke because there haven't been repeats of winners
conveniently ignoring the fact that G2 was second seed from EU lmao
I think now with fade as a counter to explosive neon they might lose but that does not make m1 a fluke
There’s never been a team on a good run that this website has not tried to claim is a fluke. A lot of donkeys roam this site
Gambit era from Master 3 and champion.. otherwise no one really stayed at the top
Loud and Zeta both weak and both were top-3
Makes you question how good Reykjavik was lol
Neon jett and sova was nerfed, fade was introduced. The game has changed nothing else, no fluke.
Yeah yeah yeah, fluke this, fluke that, the tournament would be real exciting if the exact same teams made every masters and placed exactly the same every time right?
Maybe underdogs winning actually make the tournament more exciting.