https://www.idrlabs.com/moral-alignment/test.php
i got chaotic evil, let's see who everyone truly is on vlr
https://www.idrlabs.com/moral-alignment/test.php
i got chaotic evil, let's see who everyone truly is on vlr
lawful neutral uh i dont agree wit ts. wdym i care more for law over moral considerations VAS
31Raven [#13]lawful good cuz im the goat
ima say the same thing i said to TMV's alt, live a little lol
I’m in the middle square but leaning towards bot right although you alr knew that
You are 35% evil, 22.5% lawful, making you neutral evil.
I want it to be known I am very close to true neutral so please don't judge me, this quiz is bs
dimmed [#16]You are 35% evil, 22.5% lawful, making you neutral evil.
I want it to be known I am very close to true neutral so please don't judge me, this quiz is bs
dimmed, embrace your evil side, don't fight it.
riensluvr [#22]damn bro why y'all such good people
cuz only good ppl live rewarding lives
Arun777 [#25]cuz only good ppl live rewarding lives
no wonder my life sucks ass rn
chaotic evil, although I'm probably more neutral evil (I tweaked some answers 4fun)
notallwhowander [#30]chaotic evil, although I'm probably more neutral evil (I tweaked some answers 4fun)
I think you should be more concerned about the evil trait rather the lawfulness
I'm good, lean chaotic (I think I'm good toward mate and people outside game, but I'm evil against opponent everything is good to win, especially tilting them, and winning without killing anyone)
dimmed [#31]I think you should be more concerned about the evil trait rather the lawfulness
that trait has persisted through multiple of these bs tests so I'm not surprised
I wouldn't say I'm evil, just kinda self-serving and not particularly conscientious. I'm not inclined to break the law in any drastic ways cause that'd be a net negative, for me. I also don't default to playing underhanded games, I consider that low class behaviour.
also I'd hope atp my framework for action is sufficiently separated from my base inclinations ( I think)
notallwhowander [#33]that trait has persisted through multiple of these bs tests so I'm not surprised
I wouldn't say I'm evil, just kinda self-serving and not particularly conscientious. I'm not inclined to break the law in any drastic ways cause that'd be a net negative, for me. I also don't default to playing underhanded games, I consider that low class behaviour.
also I'd hope atp my framework for action is sufficiently separated from my base inclinations ( I think)
if you could subtract 10 years from someone else's life and add it onto your own would you do it
riensluvr [#36]if you could subtract 10 years from someone else's life and add it onto your own would you do it
If it is absolutely necessary to do to achieve some goal, I'd subtract 1 from 10 people. Or kill off some 70 yr old with 10 extra yrs left
notallwhowander [#41]If it is absolutely necessary to do to achieve some goal, I'd subtract 1 from 10 people. Or kill off some 70 yr old with 10 extra yrs left
i guess with no restrictions i'd just take it off someone truly evil and damaging to society and not even feel bad about it
what if it had to be someone who knows you on a first name basis
riensluvr [#42]i guess with no restrictions i'd just take it off someone truly evil and damaging to society and not even feel bad about it
what if it had to be someone who knows you on a first name basis
your categories for "truly evil" might be insufficiently determined though, but I guess taking yrs off someone who has been shown beyond all reasonable doubt to commit capital murder is a pretty good answer.
For the second part, again, if it was absolutely (heavy lifting here) necessary, yea probably.
dimmed [#16]You are 35% evil, 22.5% lawful, making you neutral evil.
I want it to be known I am very close to true neutral so please don't judge me, this quiz is bs
Thinking about this has me thinking of something that happened earlier today.
To keep things concise, we were told they'd be available anywhere between 2:00-3:30 6-18th December and arrived at 3:20 expecting to collect what we needed to but were then told the staff responsible was absent and wouldn't be able to. I chose to be a "karen" and complain about the ridiculousness of the situation to someone working there, thinking about it now, it's rather obvious they had little authority in the matter so I was just making their lives more difficult. (Maybe I am a little evil)
In my defense I don't think I was in the wrong to complain as I and other people had to go out of our way, some commuting for over an hour to get there and they were the ones who set those times, at least an update would be nice.
(Btw complaining did work since I found someone with the authority to settle things, but in hindsight I should've asked to speak to someone else from the get go)
notallwhowander [#44]your categories for "truly evil" might be insufficiently determined though, but I guess taking yrs off someone who has been shown beyond all reasonable doubt to commit capital murder is a pretty good answer.
For the second part, again, if it was absolutely (heavy lifting here) necessary, yea probably.
idk i guess by truly evil i meant like serial killers/pedophiles and shit but i guess it's a loose category