Whenever you look at the "greatest of all time" or "top ten players of all time" lists, you will always see chronicle at the top, and for some reason that dosent sit right with me. Chronicle is an amazing player, you throw him on any roster and you can count on him performing well, he is Mr. Reliable, a top 10 - if not 5 - player of all time... but not number 1. I feel as if he is the easy name to call to - a cop out almost - because he's the winningest player of all time, but winningest =/= the greatest at this stage in the games lifespan.
i dont feel like hes ever had to play on a bad roster and make a name for them
i dont think that he has taken any one meta or any one agent and innovated the way that they are played
i think he has the ability to take over a map very easily (but so do so many other players)
i think he is a good player, who has been placed on good teams, and managed to get good results (which i understand is not something that happens often in games, and for that reason hes a top player)
out of all the esports i know, going down the list of the GOATS in each respective field i see:
Imperial hal (apex)
n0tail (dota2)
s1mple (cs)
faker(lol)
I dont feel like chronicles name fits on that list in this current moment in time, i think in the future it could fit there, but for me its hard to say.
do yall think we will ever get a unilateral GOAT in Val, and which player, new or old, do you think will take up that mantle?
i dont have a top 10 list myself so there isnt any bias.
also by what metric to measure the greatest of all (at this stage of the game) i dont know