#VIVA RRQ 2-0
ZETA
RRQ
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.65 1.70 1.59 | 326 348 303 | 27 15 12 | / 15 9 6 / | 5 2 3 | +12 +6 +6 | 83% 92% 73% | 226 240 212 | 31% 46% 20% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.08 0.73 1.48 | 224 186 266 | 17 7 10 | / 18 11 7 / | 11 6 5 | -1 -4 +3 | 87% 83% 91% | 146 110 186 | 28% 27% 29% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.86 0.47 1.28 | 162 121 207 | 15 6 9 | / 17 11 6 / | 13 5 8 | -2 -5 +3 | 87% 92% 82% | 109 63 160 | 26% 21% 29% | 1 0 1 | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.83 0.74 0.92 | 201 200 203 | 16 7 9 | / 18 11 7 / | 2 1 1 | -2 -4 +2 | 74% 75% 73% | 122 120 124 | 31% 35% 28% | 7 4 3 | 3 2 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.51 0.25 0.79 | 118 119 119 | 7 3 4 | / 18 12 6 / | 7 5 2 | -11 -9 -2 | 70% 50% 91% | 100 104 96 | 18% 21% 14% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.15 1.27 1.05 | 215 239 193 | 19 10 9 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 2 2 | +2 +1 +1 | 78% 64% 92% | 145 168 124 | 30% 27% 33% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.14 1.24 1.05 | 227 270 189 | 19 10 9 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 3 1 | +3 +1 +2 | 70% 73% 67% | 157 185 132 | 28% 36% 20% | 4 2 2 | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.10 0.66 1.50 | 247 133 352 | 20 5 15 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 3 2 | +2 -4 +6 | 78% 64% 92% | 163 93 227 | 35% 20% 43% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.02 0.92 1.12 | 168 169 169 | 14 6 8 | / 14 8 6 / | 8 5 3 | 0 -2 +2 | 74% 73% 75% | 108 125 93 | 26% 30% 23% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.85 0.22 1.42 | 173 42 294 | 14 1 13 | / 17 9 8 / | 11 5 6 | -3 -8 +5 | 61% 36% 83% | 107 28 180 | 33% 11% 41% | 2 0 2 | 5 3 2 | -3 -3 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.53 1.50 1.52 | 302 307 290 | 72 42 30 | / 42 27 15 / | 12 4 8 | +30 +15 +15 | 81% 83% 79% | 201 202 200 | 33% 39% 28% | 8 5 3 | 3 1 2 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
0.92 1.61 1.22 | 228 183 267 | 53 23 30 | / 39 28 11 / | 33 18 15 | +14 -5 +19 | 84% 78% 93% | 139 120 163 | 22% 21% 22% | 6 2 4 | 7 6 1 | -1 -4 +3 | |
|
0.83 1.15 0.97 | 215 190 257 | 48 21 27 | / 45 29 16 / | 12 9 3 | +3 -8 +11 | 75% 75% 75% | 139 126 156 | 33% 28% 39% | 14 6 8 | 10 7 3 | +4 -1 +5 | |
|
0.77 1.16 0.94 | 189 175 208 | 39 20 19 | / 46 30 16 / | 39 23 16 | -7 -10 +3 | 81% 75% 89% | 126 113 144 | 21% 17% 24% | 5 3 2 | 2 1 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.54 0.58 0.56 | 108 123 96 | 21 13 8 | / 43 29 14 / | 20 13 7 | -22 -16 -6 | 72% 64% 82% | 84 95 69 | 20% 29% 10% | 5 2 3 | 5 4 1 | 0 -2 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.03 1.17 1.11 | 234 229 246 | 52 21 31 | / 48 23 25 / | 13 8 5 | +4 -2 +6 | 67% 68% 67% | 156 144 166 | 19% 20% 18% | 8 2 6 | 8 3 5 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.10 1.02 1.05 | 206 203 207 | 46 20 26 | / 47 23 24 / | 11 4 7 | -1 -3 +2 | 78% 68% 86% | 140 140 139 | 29% 28% 29% | 11 4 7 | 8 5 3 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
0.57 1.30 0.98 | 211 128 284 | 48 12 36 | / 49 24 25 / | 17 8 9 | -1 -12 +11 | 72% 61% 81% | 133 84 172 | 25% 22% 27% | 3 0 3 | 4 2 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.87 0.93 0.90 | 150 161 143 | 34 17 17 | / 43 21 22 / | 26 8 18 | -9 -4 -5 | 75% 75% 75% | 94 99 90 | 28% 30% 27% | 1 1 0 | 9 3 6 | -8 -2 -6 | |
|
0.36 1.17 0.82 | 159 99 205 | 35 7 28 | / 47 25 22 / | 31 14 17 | -12 -18 +6 | 66% 57% 72% | 94 68 115 | 25% 15% 31% | 3 1 2 | 8 6 2 | -5 -5 0 |
ZETA
RRQ
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.28 0.97 1.62 | 281 217 351 | 22 8 14 | / 16 11 5 / | 5 4 1 | +6 -3 +9 | 78% 75% 82% | 170 147 195 | 33% 24% 48% | 6 1 5 | 4 3 1 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
1.18 1.06 1.32 | 239 195 288 | 22 10 12 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 1 3 | +6 0 +6 | 74% 67% 82% | 154 118 193 | 37% 33% 39% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.97 0.89 1.05 | 189 193 187 | 16 8 8 | / 15 11 4 / | 13 7 6 | +1 -3 +4 | 83% 67% 100% | 108 115 100 | 10% 12% 8% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.77 0.88 0.65 | 125 149 100 | 9 6 3 | / 13 9 4 / | 8 3 5 | -4 -3 -1 | 74% 67% 82% | 100 127 70 | 24% 47% 8% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.62 0.57 0.68 | 147 166 128 | 9 5 4 | / 17 11 6 / | 16 9 7 | -8 -6 -2 | 70% 58% 82% | 96 102 90 | 12% 10% 14% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.44 1.19 1.66 | 290 238 340 | 23 9 14 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 2 2 | +7 +1 +6 | 70% 64% 75% | 180 128 228 | 15% 11% 17% | 3 0 3 | 4 2 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
1.13 0.74 1.49 | 223 143 298 | 19 6 13 | / 14 9 5 / | 5 3 2 | +5 -3 +8 | 83% 73% 92% | 136 82 186 | 16% 26% 13% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.98 0.95 1.00 | 191 165 215 | 15 6 9 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 2 1 | -2 -3 +1 | 83% 82% 83% | 131 104 156 | 28% 21% 33% | 4 1 3 | 2 2 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.90 0.98 0.82 | 139 138 141 | 10 6 4 | / 15 7 8 / | 15 3 12 | -5 -1 -4 | 87% 82% 92% | 86 75 97 | 28% 42% 22% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.65 0.38 0.90 | 144 138 150 | 10 3 7 | / 17 10 7 / | 15 8 7 | -7 -7 0 | 78% 82% 75% | 88 103 75 | 12% 11% 12% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 |
ZETA
RRQ
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.02 1.41 3.24 | 332 235 526 | 22 9 13 | / 7 6 1 / | 7 6 1 | +15 +3 +12 | 83% 75% 100% | 216 181 285 | 30% 32% 28% | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
1.77 1.83 1.67 | 342 378 273 | 23 17 6 | / 11 8 3 / | 3 1 2 | +12 +9 +3 | 89% 92% 83% | 229 248 192 | 33% 36% 29% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.15 1.01 1.44 | 197 173 247 | 13 8 5 | / 11 8 3 / | 12 8 4 | +2 0 +2 | 89% 83% 100% | 139 126 165 | 21% 17% 28% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.74 0.77 0.70 | 162 152 185 | 10 6 4 | / 11 7 4 / | 5 4 1 | -1 -1 0 | 72% 75% 67% | 121 111 141 | 35% 30% 45% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.35 0.48 0.08 | 82 102 44 | 5 4 1 | / 12 8 4 / | 5 5 0 | -7 -4 -3 | 72% 75% 67% | 43 56 19 | 14% 18% 0% | 1 1 0 | 4 3 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.03 1.05 1.02 | 211 208 213 | 12 4 8 | / 13 5 8 / | 4 0 4 | -1 -1 0 | 72% 50% 83% | 143 156 136 | 30% 56% 23% | 5 2 3 | 3 1 2 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.99 0.58 1.19 | 159 135 171 | 11 3 8 | / 13 6 7 / | 5 1 4 | -2 -3 +1 | 56% 50% 58% | 86 77 90 | 37% 30% 40% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.76 0.60 0.85 | 143 190 121 | 10 5 5 | / 14 6 8 / | 3 0 3 | -4 -1 -3 | 61% 67% 58% | 86 95 82 | 31% 21% 40% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.64 0.12 0.90 | 164 90 201 | 9 1 8 | / 17 6 11 / | 7 2 5 | -8 -5 -3 | 50% 33% 58% | 92 71 103 | 28% 17% 35% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.64 0.34 0.79 | 186 138 211 | 10 2 8 | / 16 6 10 / | 5 3 2 | -6 -4 -2 | 61% 67% 58% | 125 97 139 | 16% 11% 18% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
⢰⣶⠶⢶⣶⣶⡶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⡶⠶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶
⠘⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠄⠄⠄⠈⠉⠄⠄⣹⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿
⠄⠤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡈⠙⠛⣿⣿⣿⣧⣀⠠⣤⣤⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⢠⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣭⣿⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣿⣿⠉⠉⠉⢉⣉⡉⠉⠉⠙⠛⠛
⢸⣿⡀⠄⠈⣹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣷⣾⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⢩⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⣠⣴⣿⣷⣭⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠸⠿⣿⣿⣿⠋⣴⡟⠋⠈⠻⠿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠃⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡁⠈⠉⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣤⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠄⠈⠻⠿⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣠⣄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⠉⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⠒⠒⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⢸⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⢿⣦⣄⣠⣄⠛⠟⠃⣀⣀⡀⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⢀⣰⣦⣼⣿⣿⡿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⠄⢰⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢛⣥⣾⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠈⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⣧⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
ZETA 2 - 0 RRQ
Holy fuck, RRQ needs to get their shit together. I like to troll, but this shit isn't even funny anymore.
(orig: I mean, Zeta isn't THAT bad that they wouldn't win a map. They're just not good enough to counter the APAC playstyle.)
Zeta 2-1 or RRQ 2-1 Zeta always weaker in opening match but gets stronger as the tournament goes on.
Im semi worried, I think they just look extra shit versus DRX but will still beat T3 sea teams any day of week
If they lose here zeta is officially done.
RRQ wins this 2-0 || 26-0 . Japanese valorant fans in despair as their masters run will be finally revealed to be a fluke.
7x payout if rrq win lol zeta literally went 11-13 13-11 and won map 3 against the old boom roster with xffero and fl1pzjder this is going to be closer then you think
ZETA 2-1 RRQ
Some bias here definitely on my end. I think ZETA can snowball when they get the right mindset, but one map is going to catch them off guard when they lose pistol and lose multiple rifles against the bonus. ZETA just has the buff of experience, and RRQ just needs more time to figure out what they'd like to do with their team composition.
kuch ewok please stop picking lotus, how rrq play better on enemy map pick than their own map pick
ejay not bad si tadi, better rrq just stick with ejay for now. lagian emang ada yg “for sale” ? lagi pada serius vcl/ascension juga kan
edited :
really got me in the 1st half
Ejay kurang konsisten sih. Kalo RRQ mau bertahan atau lolos ke tokyo, mereka harus nambahin pemain yang betul betul gila sih. Ejay kadang bagus, next round ngetrow parah, bagus lagi, nge trow lagi, lingkaran setan.
Cause for concern. Like, something needs to change but not the roster because they can’t do that anymore.
All an experiment but I wonder if they tried scrimming Barce on smokes, SugarZ3ro on sentinels, Laz on initiator, TENNN on flex, and Dep, with crow on the bench coaching.
RRQ take the game 1. good snowball early rounds, lots of improvement. all good
We come from sending 3/3 of our team to apac playoff every stage last year and 2/3 is in gf of lcq to this shit
so many random indonesian users i’ve never seen before just commenting to mald is entertaining
EJAY feels alone in these matches
Lmemore stepping it up with him sometimes though
laz played this bad really? damn and they still won with their best player not even putting double digits on any map