What happen to those people who said emea was the best region when all of them qualified for play offs in master london? people were saying america region was the worst, but emea was the first one eliminated and america won the trophy...
Regions
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Segregating regions now?
Brazil and Latam are part of the Americas region just like Korea is part of APAC and Turkey is part pf EMEA
I dont see the point of this post. You comment how emea was always going to disappoint yet they eliminated two of ur region's teams. And then you bring up the grand final which has nothing to do with our conversation
yes, they did disappoint because they sent three teams into playoffs and none of them even made a podium finish
meanwhile an americas team won the whole thing
you can have the “we eliminated some americas teams” trophy if you want tho
If winning the event means the entire region was good, then by the same logic getting three teams into playoffs means EMEA wasn't trash. You're using team results when it helps Americas and region results when it hurts EMEA.
EMEA had the highest average placement. NRG AND G2 were dogshit.
If you wanna be a one team region thats fine by me
nrg won the last champs, nrg got top 3 in santiago and g2 got top 4 in santiago aswell. Talking about average placing throughout the two masters, not including champs. Top 1, Top 3, Top 4 for americas and what for emea? Top 4, Top 5-6th, another Top 5-6th?
Americas was ahhh , same as Pacific...them having 2 teams in finals means shit if the other seeds cants make top 8 and the AME 1st seed goes 0-2
remember master santiago when nrg was top 3, g2 was top 4 and in champs nrg won and lev won in master london. What are we talking about?
I guess nrg doing top 3 in master santiago is bad and winning champs previously is a shit team? I guess g2 going top 4 in master santiago is bad?
Discord