every other team hasnt done anything noteworthy so not included
also if you wanna combine nrg and optic they would be second
Surely NAVI/FPX over G2 for actually winning a LAN and having an equal number of top 4 appearances as them internationally
T1 has to be over DRX simply because of the trophy. Players would trade winning a fluke trophy one time than not winning anything but finishing in decent placement
imo when you compare a single somewhat flukey masters and nothing else to 5 regional wins and 3 top four placements across the entire lifespan of the game id give it to drx
a flukey masters win and nothing else is still better. Look at the way stax reacted when they won. You think he cares about the 3 top4 placements and 5regional wins? Mako would trade all of that for 1 masters win
people keep saying that
“they would trade all that for one trophy”
this is a list about ALL TIME - not a single moment.
overall, throughout VCT as a whole, DRX has found more success than T1 in total.
FNC and PRX too high, they never won Champions, top 2 should only be actual World Champion teams like LOUD and EDG
all edg has done is dominated regionally, won champs, then fell off
both fnc and prx have dominated regionally as much if not more so than edg has, won a masters, and got multiple top 4 placements at events. i could see the argument for loud maybe, but honestly id say 4th is generous for edg
You can't just include one team with another team, this is the most successful team oat not most successful player core oat.
i really only wrapped together teams that are widely accepted as being practically the same. like optic literally bought out envy and g2 took over tgrd's spot and roster. i dont really know much about VS or FPX, but DRX and NAVI both came in with 4/5 players respectively, so id say their pretty much the same roster continued on
gambit has some regional wins too plus i gave a bonus to masters berlin cause it was a 16 team masters
that's stupid asf. berlin was single elim and over 4 years ago. and how is a few regional wins and a masters better than winning a champions?
tbf i have them tied, but the format doesn't show that. ig ill put gambit above eg if that makes you happy
5 regional wins
1 Masters 1st
4 other Masters top 4 (4th, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd,)
2 Champs top 4 (2nd, 4th)
uhm right now china is a more competitive region than americas
but thats not what im saying - im saying nrg have found no regional success, while edg have, consistently
edg has also made deeper tournament runs than nrg, so its not crazy edg is higher on the list imo
Discord