I remember after Toronto a lot of people (Including myself) were saying Alfa should've still gotten MVP because of simply how insane his performance was compared to everyone else, but the responses were always "No, you literally cannot be the most valuable player if you didn't win" so I think if that is the rule we are sticking with then it should apply to everyone, and while Aspas has pulled off some of the most insane games and stats we've ever seen, we can't just change the logic to suit people, you have to win to be MVP. Do you guys believe you can be awarded the most valuable player despite losing, or not?








