this format should never happen again
because the game is finally competitive, instead of tourneys where you have basically 3 teams in contention for the title (ex. bangkok - vit, t1, and g2) every team has a shot at winning, the 1 seeds losing just proves that every team can be beaten, you saying this basically says "i prefer to watch one-sided games" than competitive ones, the ones with actual suspense instead of games where the winner is basically decided round 1
they lost cause they didn't warm up, yeah I've heard this story before
common sense will tell you that skipping those games and having more time to prep will be better most of the time, even if the statistics say something different
they were just worse and people using the first seed thing as an excuse are annoying
I know, but if you look at the games they can all be explained in other ways besides the cope reason that first seed = bad
XLG -> self explanatory, no YOU no win
FNC -> lost to a Gen G who wasn't afraid to be innovative, try knew comps, and explore the meta
RRQ -> honestly they were the only team I think maybe was negatively affected by being the first seed, lack of experience and nerves caused them to play worse than they usually do. I still think Wolves are better regardless though.
G2 -> couldn't adapt to the meta well enough after abusing tejo for so long
"they were worse"
META changes, you are in a master event, not sitting in your prac room to play for dozens of hrs without playing in the arena, you have no idea of the atmosphere in there, and you have to change the way you play in prac compare to on stage
having more time to prep will be better most of the time, even if the statistics say something different.
Look at NRG, look at the team that didn't go into this masters, are they gonna go back to either region and DESTORY all their teams and upset them?
No it is not gonna happen.
??> if you are saying having more time to prep will be better most of the time, why isn't like 2G or BOOM beating teams like GEN.G or SENTINELS. If you are saying that having more time to prep will be better most of the time
"weren't innovative enough in the new meta even though they had more time to prepare and that's a fact."
Replies this sentence bro
META changes, you are in a master event, not sitting in your prac room to play for dozens of hrs without playing in the arena, you have no idea of the atmosphere in there, and you have to change the way you play in prac compare to on stage
Imma give yall one example to end this debate. Think of Wolves. Do you see them winning against RRQ with how they choked against SEN in their first game? I dont. Wolves got a lot of momentum during those 3 games. Its a completly different story than just being thrown into the bracket halfway though the tournament
I swear, Valorant comunity complain about everything. Format, maps, agents, crowd, lighting like bro, just play. You don’t see Dota or CS players/comunity crying this much and their formats are way more brutal
Dota 2 literally drops a whole new patch in the middle of a tournament and pros just adapt & stop crying
the easiest is 4 groups of 3 teams with double elimination bracket. If riot wants #1 seeds to have advantage, they will earn a bye in group stage, only needing a single series win to qualify to playoffs while the other 2 teams in their group will need two. In this way, teams EARN their way to qualify for playoffs in international stage because they won a series internationally, not just because of the regional glory.