Purr-fectionists 2-1 FENNEL
XIP.GC
SISU
XIP.GC
SISU
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.20 1.17 1.24 | 204 201 208 | 24 10 14 | / 18 10 8 / | 12 6 6 | +6 0 +6 | 84% 81% 88% | 137 138 136 | 25% 34% 18% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.07 1.09 1.05 | 230 230 231 | 25 13 12 | / 23 12 11 / | 8 4 4 | +2 +1 +1 | 72% 69% 75% | 150 158 143 | 45% 45% 45% | 4 2 2 | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.01 0.83 1.19 | 247 245 249 | 26 12 14 | / 28 16 12 / | 8 3 5 | -2 -4 +2 | 75% 63% 88% | 163 150 175 | 45% 52% 38% | 8 4 4 | 9 6 3 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.65 1.12 | 163 110 217 | 18 6 12 | / 24 11 13 / | 19 8 11 | -6 -5 -1 | 72% 56% 88% | 109 63 155 | 34% 27% 38% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.69 0.84 0.55 | 154 153 156 | 17 8 9 | / 25 12 13 / | 9 7 2 | -8 -4 -4 | 75% 88% 63% | 112 122 102 | 43% 43% 42% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 1.63 1.04 | 240 335 146 | 27 19 8 | / 20 11 9 / | 7 1 6 | +7 +8 -1 | 75% 81% 69% | 180 251 110 | 41% 42% 39% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.19 0.93 1.44 | 251 199 304 | 27 10 17 | / 23 13 10 / | 10 5 5 | +4 -3 +7 | 72% 69% 75% | 161 132 190 | 35% 31% 38% | 5 3 2 | 3 1 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.96 0.99 0.93 | 186 199 174 | 24 13 11 | / 23 13 10 / | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | 56% 44% 69% | 119 126 112 | 30% 37% 22% | 3 3 0 | 8 5 3 | -5 -2 -3 | |
|
0.91 0.49 1.34 | 187 100 275 | 20 5 15 | / 22 12 10 / | 6 2 4 | -2 -7 +5 | 66% 56% 75% | 126 73 178 | 28% 24% 29% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.90 0.91 0.88 | 191 192 190 | 20 11 9 | / 23 12 11 / | 8 6 2 | -3 -1 -2 | 72% 75% 69% | 135 142 129 | 29% 20% 38% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.28 1.45 1.35 | 241 219 266 | 64 33 31 | / 41 23 18 / | 18 8 10 | +23 +10 +13 | 82% 78% 88% | 162 152 175 | 37% 35% 39% | 8 3 5 | 4 2 2 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.08 1.29 1.18 | 300 305 276 | 73 41 32 | / 60 38 22 / | 18 9 9 | +13 +3 +10 | 74% 68% 81% | 183 185 181 | 31% 36% 25% | 20 11 9 | 16 12 4 | +4 -1 +5 | |
|
1.10 1.22 1.15 | 194 188 206 | 46 21 25 | / 37 22 15 / | 31 19 12 | +9 -1 +10 | 82% 80% 84% | 143 144 142 | 24% 30% 18% | 4 2 2 | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.05 1.11 1.07 | 216 200 213 | 54 30 24 | / 49 27 22 / | 35 16 19 | +5 +3 +2 | 74% 65% 84% | 137 129 147 | 31% 25% 38% | 4 2 2 | 7 4 3 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.62 0.74 | 131 132 140 | 31 17 14 | / 51 26 25 / | 39 25 14 | -20 -9 -11 | 78% 88% 66% | 96 97 96 | 26% 27% 25% | 1 0 1 | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 1.09 1.12 | 219 244 208 | 56 26 30 | / 53 25 28 / | 12 3 9 | +3 +1 +2 | 76% 75% 78% | 157 185 135 | 35% 35% 34% | 5 1 4 | 7 3 4 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.98 1.12 1.06 | 206 194 226 | 53 22 31 | / 52 24 28 / | 19 6 13 | +1 -2 +3 | 68% 63% 73% | 135 125 142 | 32% 35% 29% | 8 4 4 | 6 4 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.64 1.10 0.90 | 192 147 232 | 45 15 30 | / 55 26 29 / | 19 7 12 | -10 -11 +1 | 63% 59% 65% | 127 100 149 | 28% 30% 28% | 13 3 10 | 6 3 3 | +7 0 +7 | |
|
0.82 0.85 0.84 | 170 167 180 | 45 20 25 | / 54 25 29 / | 13 9 4 | -9 -5 -4 | 64% 66% 63% | 116 108 122 | 29% 21% 35% | 4 2 2 | 8 3 5 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.84 0.73 0.77 | 146 171 139 | 39 20 19 | / 55 26 29 / | 16 5 11 | -16 -6 -10 | 61% 47% 73% | 97 112 85 | 29% 33% 25% | 5 3 2 | 10 6 4 | -5 -3 -2 |
XIP.GC
SISU
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.67 1.44 1.98 | 257 207 325 | 22 10 12 | / 10 6 4 / | 7 3 4 | +12 +4 +8 | 90% 83% 100% | 182 155 217 | 21% 18% 24% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.50 1.37 1.68 | 348 366 326 | 27 15 12 | / 16 11 5 / | 8 5 3 | +11 +4 +7 | 81% 75% 89% | 214 217 210 | 29% 29% 28% | 8 5 3 | 3 2 1 | +5 +3 +2 | |
|
1.22 1.00 1.52 | 199 149 267 | 12 4 8 | / 10 6 4 / | 10 6 4 | +2 -2 +4 | 81% 75% 89% | 159 129 200 | 24% 25% 24% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.77 0.77 0.77 | 170 184 153 | 11 7 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 11 5 6 | -4 -2 -2 | 67% 58% 78% | 120 120 121 | 29% 27% 31% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.74 0.62 | 116 111 123 | 8 5 3 | / 15 8 7 / | 13 8 5 | -7 -3 -4 | 76% 83% 67% | 85 71 105 | 11% 12% 10% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.23 0.94 1.45 | 272 252 289 | 18 7 11 | / 16 8 8 / | 10 3 7 | +2 -1 +3 | 76% 67% 83% | 164 146 178 | 31% 30% 31% | 6 2 4 | 3 1 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.95 0.60 1.22 | 227 161 277 | 16 4 12 | / 18 9 9 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -5 +3 | 81% 78% 83% | 148 129 162 | 21% 21% 22% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.95 1.15 0.80 | 178 226 143 | 16 9 7 | / 15 7 8 / | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | 62% 56% 67% | 104 107 101 | 31% 29% 33% | 1 1 0 | 5 2 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.70 0.53 0.83 | 144 130 155 | 9 3 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 6 2 4 | -8 -5 -3 | 67% 56% 75% | 89 89 90 | 27% 24% 30% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.63 0.48 0.75 | 89 91 88 | 7 3 4 | / 14 7 7 / | 7 1 6 | -7 -4 -3 | 62% 44% 75% | 58 67 52 | 27% 30% 25% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 |
XIP.GC
SISU
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.73 1.85 1.52 | 314 334 281 | 25 17 8 | / 10 7 3 / | 5 3 2 | +15 +10 +5 | 84% 83% 86% | 201 224 162 | 30% 24% 50% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.48 1.37 1.68 | 237 217 271 | 17 10 7 | / 8 5 3 / | 3 1 2 | +9 +5 +4 | 89% 83% 100% | 160 140 195 | 51% 43% 63% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.10 1.13 1.03 | 305 325 273 | 20 14 6 | / 16 11 5 / | 2 1 1 | +4 +3 +1 | 63% 67% 57% | 183 198 157 | 21% 32% 5% | 4 2 2 | 4 4 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.98 1.09 0.80 | 178 210 124 | 10 7 3 | / 9 6 3 / | 9 7 2 | +1 +1 0 | 79% 83% 71% | 135 167 80 | 23% 32% 8% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.88 0.94 0.77 | 123 124 125 | 6 4 2 | / 11 6 5 / | 17 10 7 | -5 -2 -3 | 84% 92% 71% | 82 89 69 | 23% 20% 27% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.31 1.74 1.06 | 279 313 260 | 19 9 10 | / 15 4 11 / | 2 0 2 | +4 +5 -1 | 68% 71% 67% | 174 182 169 | 30% 43% 23% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.93 0.78 1.02 | 191 142 221 | 13 3 10 | / 15 5 10 / | 2 1 1 | -2 -2 0 | 74% 57% 83% | 128 105 141 | 43% 25% 56% | 3 1 2 | 2 2 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.62 0.21 0.86 | 140 34 203 | 9 0 9 | / 16 6 10 / | 3 3 0 | -7 -6 -1 | 53% 57% 50% | 97 31 135 | 26% 0% 32% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.54 0.88 0.34 | 108 160 78 | 6 4 2 | / 15 5 10 / | 7 1 6 | -9 -1 -8 | 63% 43% 75% | 69 109 46 | 32% 36% 25% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.50 0.62 0.44 | 116 118 116 | 7 3 4 | / 17 6 11 / | 3 2 1 | -10 -3 -7 | 42% 57% 33% | 88 102 80 | 26% 40% 18% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 |
riot will have bo5 for every irrelevant tourney (incl many gc) but not for this? i understand its not "lower final" but man...
but g2 gozen is not unbeatable. yeah, they have a good players, but they not unbeatable. and sr is not unbeatable too because they have flor
yes, g2 gozen are strong team, and they dominate in their region, and once they win gc champs. but, in this year i think many teams from other regions improved a lot (not all teams from other regions are qualified yet)
g2 and sr are good, but they’re not unbeatable. and the other teams too
This really sucks for SISU. Imagine being the second strongest team in the tournament but will be eliminated due to format and choke lol
Sisu choked pretty bad against MIR with Dorothy on flow. I doubt it would happen again if they faced each other. It sucks because we wont be able to see that due to this shit format.
Agree the format sucks, especially when going vs Xipto is such a death sentence but imo sisu didn't look like the 2nd strongest team at all. I don't see the argument for the choke vs MIR when they weren't that dominant on the other series vs SL9, arguably one of the weakest teams in the tournament
Rito dumb or what? 1st and 2nd place go to international but it's single elim? Most braindead format I've seen so far
what a dumb format, riot always doing stupid formats. And they make sure that only 1 SEA team will get those 2 spots for champs. I think SISU will learn from their mistakes and will win over MIR if only the format wasn't so shit. This could have been XIPTO and SISU as representatives of APAC
Riot any last minute change playoffs matchups?
I want to see
Zeta vs sisu
Xipto vs Mir
pretty sure xipto will win this game and zeta vs mir is more interesting
how did they losing abyss to that mid team lul
disgusting
i hope they stop picking maps which they never play (example: zeta pick abyss against boba and lose)
yeah like why pick a map u havent played all season, in a single elim qualification bo3 ? tf
i have same questions to xipto
why they pick abyss????? they want to lose or what? if xipto lose to that team, it would be most awful thing
i want to see xipto in gc champs, because they deserve more and look really nice
Xipto caught off-guard and also sisu abyss strats looking like heretics gameplay
this entire year i felt like xipto was winning only bcoz of firepower .... their strat book is non-existent ... losing kohaibi hurt them much more than they think
True still enerii should just move to sr xipto has no strats
g2 would dismantle them so hard just on strats alone look how they get fill ecod running brainless in 3rd time today
today good person in vct pacific chat said: “if xipto can’t win sisu, they have no chance in gc champs against emea or na teams”
Xipto this year - lost their IGL due to some petty drama and became worse firepower wise, just a bunch of friends + enerii
no point of having lower bracket at all whoever win goes to berlin. 3rd place doesnt get anything significantly.
bro i have same thoughts......but i think maybe org is not interested to sign gc teams
but imagine this...it would be cool if someone as you said like talon/prx signed xipto
lemme just call up the CEO real quick and ask... How the fuck are we supposed to know lmao
PRX is mega poor as an org, they're literally just 1 valorant team and that's it, they pour all their money into 1 basket.
i love how everyone just jump in and start trash talking them the second they were losing and goes silent hiding in the shadow fangirling them when they Winning
this community is so wholesome and of course not filled with weird losers kids xD
so if they look bad, let's just trash talk them? i see PRX fans type shit
whos trash talking ...
edit : people are just disappointed bcoz they are playing bad , and they are our only hope
Nt sisu still props for them💗
This format is so brutal for a qualifying on gc champs
lmfao mods deleted my comment you cannot silence me unfortunately for your favoritism
Frankly, I don't think a double elimination is sufficient for the knockout stage. I think more than triple elimination is better.