BIG BAAM : Next victim, please !
BAAM
BRN
BAAM
BRN
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 1.67 0.67 | 232 294 172 | 25 17 8 | / 19 7 12 / | 4 3 1 | +6 +10 -4 | 73% 87% 60% | 153 193 112 | 35% 24% 71% | 5 3 2 | 4 1 3 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.94 0.85 1.03 | 171 130 213 | 19 7 12 | / 23 11 12 / | 15 10 5 | -4 -4 0 | 73% 67% 80% | 125 97 153 | 35% 29% 39% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.94 1.07 0.82 | 213 245 182 | 22 14 8 | / 22 9 13 / | 4 1 3 | 0 +5 -5 | 63% 73% 53% | 147 162 132 | 27% 32% 22% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.93 1.05 0.80 | 196 212 181 | 19 11 8 | / 24 11 13 / | 6 4 2 | -5 0 -5 | 63% 67% 60% | 130 155 104 | 32% 34% 29% | 7 4 3 | 1 1 0 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
0.76 0.62 0.90 | 143 125 163 | 15 7 8 | / 20 10 10 / | 4 2 2 | -5 -3 -2 | 60% 60% 60% | 93 72 115 | 25% 15% 38% | 2 2 0 | 4 2 2 | -2 0 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 1.45 0.89 | 252 309 196 | 28 18 10 | / 19 8 11 / | 2 1 1 | +9 +10 -1 | 60% 67% 53% | 148 187 108 | 33% 30% 37% | 8 5 3 | 7 4 3 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.12 1.27 0.97 | 207 233 181 | 23 13 10 | / 19 8 11 / | 7 6 1 | +4 +5 -1 | 73% 87% 60% | 143 157 130 | 22% 20% 24% | 2 2 0 | 3 0 3 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
1.01 1.28 0.75 | 154 193 116 | 18 11 7 | / 20 9 11 / | 9 7 2 | -2 +2 -4 | 70% 93% 47% | 115 133 96 | 17% 19% 14% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.95 0.69 1.22 | 221 176 267 | 23 9 14 | / 22 11 11 / | 7 4 3 | +1 -2 +3 | 73% 73% 73% | 130 118 142 | 18% 7% 29% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.93 1.08 0.78 | 166 159 173 | 16 9 7 | / 20 8 12 / | 12 6 6 | -4 +1 -5 | 80% 87% 73% | 115 97 134 | 21% 21% 20% | 2 1 1 | 3 0 3 | -1 +1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.83 0.68 1.25 | 258 332 187 | 58 41 17 | / 42 15 27 / | 16 8 8 | +16 +26 -10 | 76% 87% 65% | 163 205 120 | 32% 29% 41% | 7 4 3 | 5 2 3 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.88 1.15 1.02 | 206 202 213 | 45 22 23 | / 43 22 21 / | 9 6 3 | +2 0 +2 | 68% 74% 61% | 137 135 139 | 27% 22% 35% | 10 5 5 | 9 4 5 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.82 0.84 0.83 | 153 138 169 | 34 15 19 | / 47 23 24 / | 29 21 8 | -13 -8 -5 | 69% 74% 65% | 110 97 123 | 32% 27% 36% | 1 1 0 | 3 0 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.93 0.72 0.83 | 198 220 176 | 41 26 15 | / 49 20 29 / | 9 3 6 | -8 +6 -14 | 60% 61% 58% | 133 141 125 | 23% 25% 21% | 2 1 1 | 7 4 3 | -5 -3 -2 | |
|
0.73 0.64 0.68 | 163 162 162 | 34 17 17 | / 50 23 27 / | 13 11 2 | -16 -6 -10 | 63% 71% 55% | 101 114 89 | 25% 30% 20% | 11 6 5 | 7 4 3 | +4 +2 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.66 1.20 1.43 | 292 374 214 | 66 42 24 | / 40 19 21 / | 7 4 3 | +26 +23 +3 | 68% 77% 58% | 172 206 137 | 28% 25% 33% | 18 11 7 | 12 8 4 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.04 1.14 1.09 | 228 210 247 | 49 23 26 | / 45 19 26 / | 14 9 5 | +4 +4 0 | 73% 77% 68% | 162 146 178 | 22% 18% 27% | 6 3 3 | 5 1 4 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.85 1.05 0.95 | 215 195 235 | 47 23 24 | / 45 22 23 / | 17 8 9 | +2 +1 +1 | 71% 77% 65% | 130 121 139 | 17% 11% 22% | 2 1 1 | 5 3 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
1.20 0.68 0.94 | 166 176 155 | 33 19 14 | / 40 14 26 / | 23 13 10 | -7 +5 -12 | 74% 84% 65% | 113 108 117 | 20% 15% 24% | 3 1 2 | 5 1 4 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.10 0.76 0.93 | 153 173 134 | 36 21 15 | / 42 18 24 / | 19 11 8 | -6 +3 -9 | 71% 87% 55% | 107 116 97 | 17% 19% 13% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 |
BAAM
BRN
BAAM
BRN
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.97 0.69 | 284 367 202 | 33 24 9 | / 23 8 15 / | 12 5 7 | +10 +16 -6 | 78% 88% 69% | 172 217 127 | 30% 33% 22% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.26 1.13 1.39 | 268 275 261 | 30 15 15 | / 23 12 11 / | 5 4 1 | +7 +3 +4 | 75% 88% 63% | 178 194 161 | 28% 25% 32% | 8 3 5 | 5 2 3 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.72 0.78 0.66 | 135 145 127 | 15 8 7 | / 24 12 12 / | 14 11 3 | -9 -4 -5 | 66% 81% 50% | 96 97 96 | 29% 26% 33% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.72 0.81 0.64 | 183 197 170 | 19 12 7 | / 27 11 16 / | 5 2 3 | -8 +1 -9 | 56% 50% 63% | 120 122 119 | 20% 20% 20% | 2 1 1 | 3 3 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.46 0.43 0.49 | 130 116 144 | 15 6 9 | / 26 12 14 / | 7 7 0 | -11 -6 -5 | 63% 75% 50% | 75 75 74 | 17% 24% 13% | 4 2 2 | 6 3 3 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.68 1.87 1.50 | 332 434 231 | 38 24 14 | / 21 11 10 / | 5 3 2 | +17 +13 +4 | 75% 88% 63% | 194 225 164 | 25% 22% 30% | 10 6 4 | 5 4 1 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
1.07 0.82 1.31 | 249 190 309 | 26 10 16 | / 26 11 15 / | 7 3 4 | 0 -1 +1 | 72% 69% 75% | 179 135 222 | 23% 15% 29% | 4 1 3 | 2 1 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.95 1.31 0.59 | 165 192 138 | 17 10 7 | / 20 6 14 / | 11 7 4 | -3 +4 -7 | 69% 81% 56% | 110 119 101 | 19% 12% 28% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.94 1.00 0.89 | 208 212 205 | 24 14 10 | / 23 11 12 / | 10 4 6 | +1 +3 -2 | 69% 81% 56% | 130 124 137 | 15% 15% 16% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.85 0.93 0.78 | 152 155 151 | 18 10 8 | / 22 9 13 / | 10 4 6 | -4 +1 -5 | 72% 81% 63% | 99 101 98 | 16% 19% 13% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
BREN will definitely will take this match up with caution because BAAM is on fire right now. May the better team win but I predict it will be BREN 2-1 (Map picks: Ascent, Haven, Icebox || Map bans: Breeze, Bind)
edit: didn't expect Icebox to be banned and Breeze to be picked but still got 2/3
BAAM beat FS convincingly so this will be a tough matchup for BREN. Hopefully it's a close match with BREN on top.
This is gonna be a close match, both showed dominance, 2-1 for BAAM with OT in the third map.
Yeah bro baam actually looking strong if they keep it like that they might upset brn. Good luck to both teams. Show us that sea is not weak region
More like the first 'real' opponent for BREN, after '4 Scrims' they finally get a game KEKW
What? Baam has played against Full Sense and x10, both are infinitely better than any team that Bren faced. Your group was easy, first game was against CES (basically the easiest seed 2 you could've gotten, because CBT is from your group).
stop it buddy both games went to OT and was close enough, ggs to both teams i hope they both go to berlin eventually
Funny how youre not considering how the tables and bracketing works. Bren is the champion of the ph challengers 1 and x10 is the champion of th challengers 1 HAHAHAHAHAHA you want all noobs team in the same bracket whilst the strong team in the same bracket???? what's the advantage of winning the first challengers. know how the rules of bracketing and tables work. before you complain. theyre strong in their country. dont belittle sharper and ego esports. crybaby
Even for seed 1, you got the easiest group and also the easiest opponent in the play off before you played Baam. Compare your group with x10, uWu or ONIC who are all first seed. I don't see how you could argue that your group is not the easiest among the first seeds lol.
You got the point but my point is even you put bren, uwu, x10, prx in the same group is still the same bren esport will dominate the group stage
Tbh I don't mind if BAAM doesn't go to Berlin, it's their first major tourney. I just want quality games and I must say they exceeded my expectations even tho it was quite high
Nah mate. That was hella close. Mistakes and insane plays from both
No matter what happens, both of these teams have shown that they can be one of the best if not the best teams in SEA.
If baam manage to win, those who bet on them will be ez money, 100 to 1 odds what in the fck (but i hope bren win)
crazyguy backsite B 20iq cost them the game wp hahaha can 100% win to 14-12
DubsteP skilled player but that is not normally, This very very insane....They need to check him pc and game.....Maybe he not cheating but maybe he using the game deficit ...and this cant seem on game screen..He needs to check-up....
DubsteP skilled player but that is not normally, This very very insane....They need to check him pc and game.....Maybe he not cheating but maybe he using the game deficit ...and this cant seem on game screen..He needs to check-up....
It's hard bro, 5 BREN players play consistently, while BAAM is dependent on Crazyguy or entikay multi kills
i'd say d0rf has more impact than enteekay. his jett isn't the best, and not explosive enough for baam's playstyle imo. he has improved a lot tho.
it's pretty hyped, but csgo is still majority. I'm one of the rare few who switched to Val completely, simply bc it's new and I have a fresh start and interest
who is the most famous active/ex csgo player in vietnam and switched to valo? crazyguy is famous right?
crazyguy is popular yes. ngl i don't follow vn cs much, mainly emea cs and emea/na /sea val.
Holy shit what a series, a bit disappointed cuz we didnt manage at matchpoints, btw yours dubstep is truly insane, wait for us Bren we'll meet in finals.
It really is insane matches but not gonna be easy for bren to go to finals, prx lookin good right now. But I hope both baam and bren make it their match was so intense.
Just my opinion,
PRX will win against BREN. But I feel PRX will be struggle to play against BOOM / Full Sense.
So if PRX losing against BOOM today, BREN should be securing 1 ticket to Berlin & get the SEA championship title
I'm still thinking PRX has the upper hand against BOOM. IMO Bren/BAAM/Full Sense + PRX 1st seed
I respect your opinion, but this is based on PRX history against this two teams.
Interesting, not a very clean history against those two. But it's a new PRX and all that, and I think their confidence after drawing FS is pretty good.
Yes the odds in prx but it feels like bren is on another level this is SEA peak valorant we are witnessing
He was always Breach on Haven and almost always Sage on Ascent, so not a big surprise
cuz he is main raze and semi-duelist in the team. So when BAAM play with 1 duelist, Red must play as Sage (easiest champ I think?)