0

its looking bad for TL

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
PrTsty

if FPX loses the next map (unless they lose 13-1) NaVi, FPX and GMB are making it through

#2
Femly
6
Frags
+

TL doesnt deserve playoff anyway with all that weird ass comps

#3
chimpy
1
Frags
+

True

#4
LegendaryPP
1
Frags
+

True

#6
Tsukuyomi
1
Frags
+

True

#7
PrTsty
16
Frags
+

true mens all teams should be boring af and everyone should do the same thing, makes val 100 times more enjoyable

#16
bruc
0
Frags
+

Facts
Lol

#31
Vasudev
0
Frags
+

bro u mean u waana see viper on haven (for the sake of your entertainment)

#33
PrTsty
0
Frags
+

for the sake of my second favorite team, yes

#34
Vasudev
0
Frags
+

hopium overdose : lets see bro good luck

#8
kbkdark
0
Frags
+

Ultra W

#19
Kr1zt
5
Frags
+

It's bad for you try to innovate in comps??
At first kayo comps was throw and now it's pretty decent

#21
fadezis
-2
Frags
+

Because of buffs of KayO, not because of pro players playing him lmao

#39
miniature
0
Frags
+

pro players are the literal frontline of finding out what is actually viable. the whole world follows what pro teams run b/c they would rather trust what they see the pros do. so yea, kayo buffs made him meta but there would be no meta changes if nobody played anything new my guy. There is a time and a place for testing certain things but they've had their time to develop what they are using now.

And if u need a broad example of meta testing, just look at the difference in pickrate of sova in EU vs NA. nothing got changed with sova yet the meta did. (ratio below which region got it right.)

#44
fadezis
2
Frags
+

"meta changes" its just developers overbuff or overnerf something. Its not bcs some pro player played it in pro match agent, so developers saw it and made discussion how to make agent viable as you wrote. Even opposite. They just saw high/low pickrate stats of ranked over and over so they decided to overbuff or overnerf someone with big/low pickrate instead of trying to make real balance, thats it. Only good things they did were connected with economy of weapons, abilities and ultimates.
Also idk why you trying to describe importance of innovation to guy with FPX flair(team that played with a lot innovation comps in 2021). It is all may sounds cool but in reality...
Team that won first int lan wasnt fnatic my friend. Not even in EU first strike/masters.. Individual skill and good basics always owns weird comps and hardstrats even in this game. Simplier you playing - less mistakes you doing. G2 won 8 tournaments in a row in 2020 just because of skill diff. Sentinels skill diffed everyone in first half of 2021. Gambit won EMEA and M3 just because of skill diff (you can understand it because of how they won even in their permaban map without any preps. They just played the most simplest comp ever and own everyone with their individual level). Acend, Champions winner of 2021 on the final map in the grand final won against Gambit with Split meta of 2020: omen,cypher,raze,sage and jett, btw all nerfed since 2020 and not even in meta of 2021, but what happend? Were acend innovaters? What happend with them against guild when they tryed new crazy stuff? Players dont know how to react while they are playing something weird.
You can test and experiment with whatever you want in scrims, but when its time of official game choice of winner is consistent, comfort and confidence not just element of surprise. No matter how much your favourite agents nerfed matter only is this comp comfortable enough for you and your team.

Like said Bruce Lee "I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who had practiced one kick 10,000 times".

#45
miniature
1
Frags
+

We are exiting the tunnel of "overbuff overnerf" patches now (imo) with having any controller be viable, flex picks galore, no solid 1 comp meta really, etc. Surprise factor obviously is a weighted choice over the potential loss of comfortability, but its unlikely any team worth talking about is changing comps off a whim. Funny enough, Ascend's comps honestly pushes the concept that pro teams are where viability is tested. Astra was dominant, ascend didnt give a fuck and managed to make it work flawlessly on bind. The comfort factor comes with any comp u like running as a team. Time is not everything otherwise updates wouldn't even matter.

Can also tell you that just because a comp is "more successful" does not explicitly mean it is more comfortable for the team.

On the same note, a comp can fail with 4 players comfortable and 1 not being up to par on an agent they need to be able to play. I am making this point because when a team's comp choices are noted you are going to have a very hard time accurately guessing how "uncomfortable" it actually is for the players. Tiny errors can lose whole rounds; singular rounds can economically lose you a whole match. This isn't a tailored argument for any team's recent history its just the broad reality that goes into the decisions.

#47
fadezis
1
Frags
+

Yeah, i agree with this all. Hopefully we are really finally exiting overbuff/nerfs period and our future is not another billion mirror matches.

Friendship with "META" is over comfort comps are my new best friends 😎

#20
A_Silent_Fart
-2
Frags
+

yes Tl shoulsnt use comps which you dont like, and also qualifying for masters is whats important and not making it to playoffs.

#24
PunisherXPR
1
Frags
+

You do know they can't make Masters if they dont finish top 3 at EMEA playoffs, right?

#35
axnav7
0
Frags
+

good on theory but not practical

#36
eSBee
5
Frags
+

You wouldnt be saying this if TL were winning, this game is still very new and there are coaches who wanna expt with diff comps. Remember TL were the first team to do a no duelist comp in heven n literally owned FPX in that match n 13-0 OXG. Sliggy is no dumb that he would make a weird comp with no strats.

#41
5headtakes
3
Frags
+

TL doesn't deserve playoff for trying new comps yet only losing to the arguably 2 best teams in the group, I've seen it all lol. Creativity should be looked down upon I guess.

#42
_wrld_
1
Frags
+

So being unique and trying new comps = weird ass.

#5
Arisqq
0
Frags
+

dw FPX will win

#9
Just_1uck
0
Frags
+

navi also needs to win 13 7 i think, they need more rounds than liquid, or im wrong?

#11
PrTsty
0
Frags
+

no, if they win 2-0 they have a better map diff

#13
6vine
0
Frags
+

Explain?

#17
fadezis
0
Frags
+

Tl rounds diff is "-2"

#22
6vine
0
Frags
+

TL's round diff is -1 and NaVi's round diff is -6 rn

#12
kbkdark
0
Frags
+

yup... the round differential is the tiebreaker to go to playoffs

#10
LouBag
2
Frags
+

Honestly it’s good for NA if liquid don’t make it.

They have one of the highest skill ceilings in Valorant.

#30
PrTsty
0
Frags
+

CIS teams might not be able to attend masters aswell

#14
ait8k
0
Frags
+

fuck man

#15
Mortadelo
3
Frags
+

3/3 CIS lmao

#18
fadezis
0
Frags
+

Dont like it if this costs to lose 1st place for FPX🥺🙏

#37
asdfgh
0
Frags
+

FPX is eu rn

#38
Mortadelo
3
Frags
+

Qualified through CIS quals

#23
makewar
0
Frags
+

I do prefer the game that fpx, gambit and Navi are showing way more than liquid's, but I worry about those three because, between all of them, there are 11 Russian players, that probably won't make it to Reykjavik, so what wi happen if those teams manage to get the EMEA spots for masters?

#26
bruc
0
Frags
+

This guy 💀

#25
CongoBat
0
Frags
+

Doesn’t liquid win the h2h with navi?

#29
PrTsty
0
Frags
+

not in a 3-way tie

#32
CongoBat
0
Frags
+

mb didnt realise it would be 3 way between them

#27
Albala
0
Frags
+

The tiebraker is actually h2h

#28
PrTsty
0
Frags
+

not in a 3-way tie

#40
JustEnjoying
0
Frags
+

how so? If FPX even loses against NAVI everyone will be 3-2 in the group. Except for Gambit and LDN YET. and IF LDN wins then Liquid out? idk what I'm talking about lmao

#46
mave
0
Frags
+

If FPX lose there will be 3 teams with 3-2 (if ldn dont beat gambit) so h2h doesnt work anymore, then it will be deciced by map difference and because tl got 2-0ed twice it sucks for them

#43
fadezis
0
Frags
+

.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment