1) f0rsaken
2) something
3) chronicle
0
Top 3 flex ranked
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
https://www.vlr.gg/player/9801/f0rsaken/?timespan=all (24/28 agents) {played, all 4 agent classes and played to a high level}
https://www.vlr.gg/player/458/chronicle/?timespan=all (19/28 agents) {played, all 4 agent classes and played to a high level}
https://www.vlr.gg/player/17086/something/?timespan=all (12 agents) {Played 3 agent classes with duelist being his best and 3 games on brimstone (didn't play well in the games), so imma take that are 2 agent classes played to a high enough level}
due to this difference we can't consider something something a true flex player or a goat of flexing sorry
ok no that logic is dumb asf, it's like people saying chronicle can't play duelist because he plays on a team with people that can duelist. Like half the reason f0rsaken has flexed as much as he does is because jingg and something aren't that flexible - not saying his flexibility isn't impressive. Like the wwhole argument of chronicle vs f0rsaken is due to the fact chronicle has been successful but f0rsaken has flexed more. So if you want you want use that logic that f0rsaken can play viper but doesn't need to then you have to say the same about chronicle.
Exactly which was my point. They are both insane flex players where the degree of flex is difficult to tell. Yes forsaken flexes more cause his teammates are more fixed but it's also because prx plays weird comps. They are both difficult to rate which is why people keep bringing up trophies. The bigger problem in comparing the two is the way they play the agents they flex. Chronicle is an insanely stable backbone that will hold down sites for his team. Whereas forsaken is essentially the third duelist on any agent. He is also the igl now and the team looks insane. It's very subjective who the better flex is but I think the fact that we are comparing a duelist turned flex who is also calling to a historic flex player is already saying a lot about forsaken.
who says f0rsaken can't viper he has always had two vipers players on his team and for a dream team our senti player is picking up viper or our main smokes(both of them have to play viper in a dream team) player guess what f0rsaken fills both roles either main smokes or senti in viper comp
there isn't a viper comp itw that f0rsaken can't play in cause thats all prx play viper AND he clears on duelist 2nd orb smokes igl he is currently better on recon and senti is similar with chron advantage but i would trust f0rsaken on chamber kj and the rest are close or even
doesn't matter f0rsaken is better at flexing any time he picks up a new agent he becomes one of the best on it instantly he has played every role in the game to T1 level including IGL and AC better stats are argument for individual list again f0rsaken is better at flexing that is like arguing who is a better at penalty's and going well chron is better mid fielder and f0rsaken still has insane stats on everything tbh
u can give chron senti and inti(f0rsaken clears on recon right now but whatever) f0rsaken still wins since he flexed onto igl and AC i know for a fact if chron could igl redgar wouldn't have a job at all on GMB or M3C and gmb wins everything with a better player on smokes and possibly a better duelist
also f0rsaken had better stats in champs 23 so chron wasn't better for 3-4 years also at madrid and shanghai and copanhagen
Discord