Post ur tracker bro I’m tryna see sum
Uncleben [#3]Valorant tracker
Duh... which account! Just go look at my tiktok bro... https://www.tiktok.com/@metaphour
m4 [#4]Duh... which account! Just go look at my tiktok bro... https://www.tiktok.com/@metaphour
Shameless self promo
Whatever ur main account is
https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/elemnos%231234/overview?platform=pc&playlist=swiftplay
https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/ttvMETAPHOUR%231234/overview?platform=pc&playlist=swiftplay
https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/ttvMETAPHoUR%234321/overview?platform=pc&playlist=swiftplay
There are so many more...
Uncleben [#5]Shameless self promo
Whatever ur main account is
I don't rank if that's what you're looking for. I would rather drag my nuts through hot coals than engage with Riot's Ranked matchmaking.
m4 [#6]https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/elemnos%231234/overview?platform=pc&playlist=swiftplay
https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/ttvMETAPHOUR%231234/overview?platform=pc&playlist=swiftplay
https://tracker.gg/valorant/profile/riot/ttvMETAPHoUR%234321/overview?platform=pc&playlist=swiftplayThere are so many more...
Holy fuck how much swiftplay do you play
Uncleben [#8]Holy fuck how much swiftplay do you play
Swfitplays really awesome for learning agents. You get a pistol, r2 save/eco and a bunch of gun rounds. Less people upset. Less time spent with throwers.
m4 [#9]Swfitplays really awesome for learning agents. You get a pistol, r2 save/eco and a bunch of gun rounds. Less people upset. Less time spent with throwers.
I honestly with all my heart believe they should take their current ranked system and use swiftplay games instead. Valorant would be a much more pleasant experience. Leave the 45 minute games to tournament and premier games. Let the people enjoy the game.
m4 [#10]I honestly with all my heart believe they should take their current ranked system and use swiftplay games instead. Valorant would be a much more pleasant experience. Leave the 45 minute games to tournament and premier games. Let the people enjoy the game.
I’m curious if valorant is ur first tac fps
Uncleben [#11]I’m curious if valorant is ur first tac fps
1999, CS whatever version. Mr Steal Your Girl in art class. I know people think I'm a random. But without me, esports would look different.
lxolotl [#13]m4 im concerned for you if your entire persona isnt ironic
Yeah...Part is part isn't.
B1itz [#14]why are you learning agents if you dont play ranked whats the point
I find it interesting. There's a lot of misconceptions about the agents. People expect them to play a certain way. It's fun to find out why those people are wrong.
lxolotl [#13]m4 im concerned for you if your entire persona isnt ironic
well never really know for sure right?
B1itz [#14]why are you learning agents if you dont play ranked whats the point
God forbids a man has a hobby
m4 [#16]I find it interesting. There's a lot of misconceptions about the agents. People expect them to play a certain way. It's fun to find out why those people are wrong.
Considering you don’t play ranked, I’m curious how you learn agents/map theory
Are you vod reviewing pros/pro teams? Are you working with analysts/coaches? Do you have prior experience or a resume as a coach or an analyst? You clearly have very distinct opinions on the game but I’m curious where you get these ideas from.
lxolotl [#13]m4 im concerned for you if your entire persona isnt ironic
It definitely isn't, he might be playing it up after the 100t icebox but he acted like that before that happened
irenic_ [#17]well never really know for sure right?
Therapy session. Okay. I'm getting really weird feedback with my stuff. There are people in the community who are scared of you and how you feel. I'm not really one of those people. I know the entire community is wrong. I'm just entertaining myself trying to figure out a way to get you to understand. It's absolutely atrocious to watch the genre I love become this generic product where people just randomly say the word "protocol" and think they nailed it.
There are two people out there that are famous, that are highly regarded in the community but I can't get them to help. In fact, one person went the entire other way after you guys came after me.
Uncleben [#20]Considering you don’t play ranked, I’m curious how you learn agents/map theory
Are you vod reviewing pros/pro teams? Are you working with analysts/coaches? Do you have prior experience or a resume as a coach or an analyst? You clearly have very distinct opinions on the game but I’m curious where you get these ideas from.
I've done all those things in the past. I've been a 20 year old trying to figure out strategy. I've been very close to pro a bunch of times and just couldn't get over the hump.
I'm dying a bit inside when I watch the games because its very clear the players need help with fundamental concepts. They all have mouse aim down. They all have the ability to be insane. They're just missing a coach to help them move in the right direction. Some day I'll get a chance. Or I won't. Life's weird.
Conceit [#21]It definitely isn't, he might be playing it up after the 100t icebox but he acted like that before that happened
Random stranger on the internet knows me better than I know me. You ever do a Tarot card reading?
m4 [#23]I've done all those things in the past. I've been a 20 year old trying to figure out strategy. I've been very close to pro a bunch of times and just couldn't get over the hump.
I'm dying a bit inside when I watch the games because its very clear the players need help with fundamental concepts. They all have mouse aim down. They all have the ability to be insane. They're just missing a coach to help them move in the right direction. Some day I'll get a chance. Or I won't. Life's weird.
What games were you nearly pro in? I’m a little bit confused why you are so sure you’d be a great coach if you haven’t actually coached before, or why’d you’d be such a good analyst if you haven’t actually worked for a pro team before. While I think a lot of casual fans think they have a lot deeper understanding of the game than they do, it’s pretty arrogant to believe that current pros and coaching staff are far inferior in their understanding of the game if you have literally never coached even a t3 valorant team.
m4 [#10]I honestly with all my heart believe they should take their current ranked system and use swiftplay games instead. Valorant would be a much more pleasant experience. Leave the 45 minute games to tournament and premier games. Let the people enjoy the game.
I partially agree. I think 24 round is too mush and 8 isnt enough. 16 might be the good balance, I rather see more BO5 with 16x5 round thans BO3 with 24x3 rounds (And it's consistent with Faria not wanting to show too mush of Val)
m4 [#23]I've done all those things in the past. I've been a 20 year old trying to figure out strategy. I've been very close to pro a bunch of times and just couldn't get over the hump.
I'm dying a bit inside when I watch the games because its very clear the players need help with fundamental concepts. They all have mouse aim down. They all have the ability to be insane. They're just missing a coach to help them move in the right direction. Some day I'll get a chance. Or I won't. Life's weird.
M4 I was wrong about you. I think you're cool. keep doing what you're doing.
Uncleben [#26]What games were you nearly pro in? I’m a little bit confused why you are so sure you’d be a great coach if you haven’t actually coached before, or why’d you’d be such a good analyst if you haven’t actually worked for a pro team before. While I think a lot of casual fans think they have a lot deeper understanding of the game than they do, it’s pretty arrogant to believe that current pros and coaching staff are far inferior in their understanding of the game if you have literally never coached even a t3 valorant team.
I'm corporate and coach people all the time.
I also have an insight into what the players are going through. I know the limitations on time. People make fun of me for making huge documents, the reason is for them. Once they fall out of grace, it really sucks for them. They look to these coaches for help, they tell them to swap agents and do default smokes. Or dive in for a sub 50/50 fight. Coaches don't care about their brands. Coaches care that they make it to the next week with a job.
Nearly pro, 1.6 and Overwatch. At the time of 1.6, that was less attractive and meant something different. Choose school over 1.6 and Overwatch had some people half in and half out.
m4 [#29]I'm corporate and coach people all the time.
I also have an insight into what the players are going through. I know the limitations on time. People make fun of me for making huge documents, the reason is for them. Once they fall out of grace, it really sucks for them. They look to these coaches for help, they tell them to swap agents and do default smokes. Or dive in for a sub 50/50 fight. Coaches don't care about their brands. Coaches care that they make it to the next week with a job.
Nearly pro, 1.6 and Overwatch. At the time of 1.6, that was less attractive and meant something different. Choose school over 1.6 and Overwatch had some people half in and half out.
Which pro players or pro teams do you have insight on? Can you name of a few of the players you have coached?
How are you aware of what these coaches are telling players? Can u name of a few coaches you think are giving their players suboptimal advice?
Anguibok [#27]I partially agree. I think 24 round is too mush and 8 isnt enough. 16 might be the good balance, I rather see more BO5 with 16x5 round thans BO3 with 24x3 rounds (And it's consistent with Faria not wanting to show too mush of Val)
I think it would be cool to find a better balance on number of rounds. I would be open to anything that is sub-30 minutes.
Uncleben [#30]Which pro players or pro teams do you have insight on? Can you name of a few of the players you have coached?
How are you aware of what these coaches are telling players? Can u name of a few coaches you think are giving their players suboptimal advice?
I've been down this line of questioning.
Once again, you're trying to scratch at something that I've already scratched at. I know what you're trying get to get at. The problem is, in no world is a 25 world going to out coach someone who is older. An older person has more experience. Has more stories. Can compare things.
A 25 year old is still in the same boat as the players. Trying to figure the world out. You shouldn't get a salary while you're trying to figure out things. Org owners, I've met a couple, do not have the insight to spare with coaches and players. They are forced to trust the process. A process defined by those who stand to benefit from wasting their time.
And I'm not outing any players or coaches. People are too rabid. Too much fandom for people who got here first.
m4 [#32]I've been down this line of questioning.
Once again, you're trying to scratch at something that I've already scratched at. I know what you're trying get to get at. The problem is, in no world is a 25 world going to out coach someone who is older. An older person has more experience. Has more stories. Can compare things.
A 25 year old is still in the same boat as the players. Trying to figure the world out. You shouldn't get a salary while you're trying to figure out things. Org owners, I've met a couple, do not have the insight to spare with coaches and players. They are forced to trust the process. A process defined by those who stand to benefit from wasting their time.
And I'm not outing any players or coaches. People are too rabid. Too much fandom for people who got here first.
praying this is a bit 🙏💔
m4 [#32]I've been down this line of questioning.
Once again, you're trying to scratch at something that I've already scratched at. I know what you're trying get to get at. The problem is, in no world is a 25 world going to out coach someone who is older. An older person has more experience. Has more stories. Can compare things.
A 25 year old is still in the same boat as the players. Trying to figure the world out. You shouldn't get a salary while you're trying to figure out things. Org owners, I've met a couple, do not have the insight to spare with coaches and players. They are forced to trust the process. A process defined by those who stand to benefit from wasting their time.
And I'm not outing any players or coaches. People are too rabid. Too much fandom for people who got here first.
I’m very curious what makes you believe that you have the answer all of these coaches don’t have. Experience alone does not make a better coach, and there are multiple coaches that are likely much more experienced than you at the highest level anyways.
Another problem you clearly have is the way you convey advice. Being a coach is more than simply understanding the game. While you might have a deeper understanding of the game, the way you express yourself comes off as arrogant, abrasive, and faux-intellectual (the obvious example is your previous guides). You have a lot of confidence for someone with a lacking resume who has never gone pro before.
I'm curious why you would get backlash for outing a player you coached. It’s easy to claim experience and insight without giving any proof whatsoever.
Uncleben [#34]I’m very curious what makes you believe that you have the answer all of these coaches don’t have. Experience alone does not make a better coach, and there are multiple coaches that are likely much more experienced than you at the highest level anyways.
Another problem you clearly have is the way you convey advice. Being a coach is more than simply understanding the game. While you might have a deeper understanding of the game, the way you express yourself comes off as arrogant, abrasive, and faux-intellectual (the obvious example is your previous guides). You have a lot of confidence for someone with a lacking resume who has never gone pro before.I'm curious why you would get backlash for outing a player you coached. It’s easy to claim experience and insight without giving any proof whatsoever.
If you wanna have a conversation, we can have one.
Your arguments about me "expressing myself" are comical. Have you ever been on the end of international infamy before? An international broadcast makes fun of you? Jokes made about something you put serious time into. This idea that I'm asshole is crazy. Someone told me they "skimmed my work" and then proceeded to be critical of it. Which caused a tidal wave of negative comments. And I'm the asshole? k.
It's wild how confident you are. You just assume you're correct because I type here on vlr. There's not a single person in this community who has heard me speak on this topic in real time. But it's okay for PlatChat to bring on all the people who "owned" me and parade them. Then do the same thing on the broadcast. I'm the asshole? Crazy. 150k+ people viewed VCTesports tiktok about me. All of them have not heard my side. This is textbook bullying and you're over here calling me the jerk.
nobody___100 [#35]hello metaphour how are you doing
Bringing my government name into this is wild.
m4 [#37]If you wanna have a conversation, we can have one.
Your arguments about me "expressing myself" are comical. Have you ever been on the end of international infamy before? An international broadcast makes fun of you? Jokes made about something you put serious time into. This idea that I'm asshole is crazy. Someone told me they "skimmed my work" and then proceeded to be critical of it. Which caused a tidal wave of negative comments. And I'm the asshole? k.
It's wild how confident you are. You just assume you're correct because I type here on vlr. There's not a single person in this community who has heard me speak on this topic in real time. But it's okay for PlatChat to bring on all the people who "owned" me and parade them. Then do the same thing on the broadcast. I'm the asshole? Crazy. 150k+ people viewed VCTesports tiktok about me. All of them have not heard my side. This is textbook bullying and you're over here calling me the jerk.
You sent a 100 page report with a ton of extraneous information and proceeded to get mad about criticism. Once again, even if you have good ideas, you’re absolutely terrible at conveying it. And I didn’t call you an asshole, I called you arrogant; you clearly have some idea that you’re better than every other coach in terms of understanding the game with no proof to back it up. Why not coach a tier 3 or tier 2 team and prove urself?
No idea what that screenshot is supposed to prove.
Uncleben [#39]You sent a 100 page report with a ton of extraneous information and proceeded to get mad about criticism. Once again, even if you have good ideas, you’re absolutely terrible at conveying it. And I didn’t call you an asshole, I called you arrogant; you clearly have some idea that you’re better than every other coach in terms of understanding the game with no proof to back it up. Why not coach a tier 3 or tier 2 team and prove urself?
No idea what that screenshot is supposed to prove.
Extraneous? Once again, you heard about 5 pages. I can tell you didn't read it. You are standing on ground like you think you have an argument. You passed up the table of contents. That says a lot about you.
Even if I entertained the idea that you read it, it was 70 pages of Rib.gg data that showed positional information. You can't get that data without a special license with Riot and cost me $100 to get a hold of a week before it was due. The idea that I would pass that up is insane. Extraneous? Are you using a thesaurus to talk to me?
And yeah I'm taking the moral high ground back from you. You are on the side of less work. Bro, why don't you practice less and tell me how that goes for you. Why don't you read less and let other people do your thinking. The one pager is seriously working right? Seeing real consistency out of these teams and trusting the process. It's alright sheeple, keep watching VCT decline in viewership in complete and utter bewilderment.
What you don't get is that you're young. The world you see was different before you got here. I'm sorry if that's shocking to you.
m4 [#40]Extraneous? Once again, you heard about 5 pages. I can tell you didn't read it. You are standing on ground like you think you have an argument. You passed up the table of contents. That says a lot about you.
Even if I entertained the idea that you read it, it was 70 pages of Rib.gg data that showed positional information. You can't get that data without a special license with Riot and cost me $100 to get a hold of a week before it was due. The idea that I would pass that up is insane. Extraneous? Are you using a thesaurus to talk to me?
And yeah I'm taking the moral high ground back from you. You are on the side of less work. Bro, why don't you practice less and tell me how that goes for you. Why don't you read less and let other people do your thinking. The one pager is seriously working right? Seeing real consistency out of these teams and trusting the process. It's alright sheeple, keep watching VCT decline in viewership in complete and utter bewilderment.
What you don't get is that you're young. The world you see was different before you got here. I'm sorry if that's shocking to you.
I’ve gone through some of your post history and it’s clear there’s no point in discussing this with you. The biggest problem for me is that there is absolutely zero reason for anyone to listen to you, since you haven’t actually coached anyone and any team that has had notable results. If you want people to take you seriously, demonstrate proof that applying your theory on how valorant works is actually effective; as a result, I’m not sure where your confidence is coming from. I’m still not sure why your unwilling to state which valorant pros you have coached, or what that screenshot of sinatraa’s chat was supposed to prove. Have a good day, and hope you get a coaching spot one day.
Uncleben [#42]I’ve gone through some of your post history and it’s clear there’s no point in discussing this with you. The biggest problem for me is that there is absolutely zero reason for anyone to listen to you, since you haven’t actually coached anyone and any team that has had notable results. If you want people to take you seriously, demonstrate proof that applying your theory on how valorant works is actually effective; as a result, I’m not sure where your confidence is coming from. I’m still not sure why your unwilling to state which valorant pros you have coached, or what that screenshot of sinatraa’s chat was supposed to prove. Have a good day, and hope you get a coaching spot one day.
Ad hominem attacks the entire time and some how you're done with the conversation?
You feel like you're losing with this one?
And yeah I'm taking the moral high ground back from you. You are on the side of less work. Bro, why don't you practice less and tell me how that goes for you. Why don't you read less and let other people do your thinking. The one pager is seriously working right? Seeing real consistency out of these teams and trusting the process. It's alright sheeple, keep watching VCT decline in viewership in complete and utter bewilderment.
I believe everyone is scared to talk to me. I believe I represent what is slowly coming to light. Coaches are just friends of players with no actual contribution. I'm watching some of the most gifted aim-talent on the planet wasted on very dumb ranked ideas.
They deserve better. They should reach out to me.
https://x.com/VALORANTdotTIPS
https://www.tiktok.com/@metaphour
m4 [#43]Ad hominem attacks the entire time and some how you're done with the conversation?
You feel like you're losing with this one?
And yeah I'm taking the moral high ground back from you. You are on the side of less work. Bro, why don't you practice less and tell me how that goes for you. Why don't you read less and let other people do your thinking. The one pager is seriously working right? Seeing real consistency out of these teams and trusting the process. It's alright sheeple, keep watching VCT decline in viewership in complete and utter bewilderment.
I believe everyone is scared to talk to me. I believe I represent what is slowly coming to light. Coaches are just friends of players with no actual contribution. I'm watching some of the most gifted aim-talent on the planet wasted on very dumb ranked ideas.
They deserve better. They should reach out to me.
https://x.com/VALORANTdotTIPS
https://www.tiktok.com/@metaphour
Still no idea what those links are supposed to prove. I suppose I should stop responding, but I simply have to ask one more question. Please give me proof, any proof at all that your ideas are the future of coaching in vct. Have you coached in other pro games? Do you have any results to back up what you are saying? If I took data from rib.gg and interpreted it in a way that makes sense to me, does that automatically mean that I know what I’m talking about and should get a coaching spot?
I do agree with your cronyism take btw, just not that you are the solution 😂😂
Uncleben [#44]Still no idea what those links are supposed to prove. I suppose I should stop responding, but I simply have to ask one more question. Please give me proof, any proof at all that your ideas are the future of coaching in vct. Have you coached in other pro games? Do you have any results to back up what you are saying? If I took data from rib.gg and interpreted it in a way that makes sense to me, does that automatically mean that I know what I’m talking about and should get a coaching spot?
I do agree with your cronyism take btw, just not that you are the solution 😂😂
Okay, you want this to be constructive, right? I'll keep trying with you. It's weird you don't see my effort but okay...
If you agree with my stance on cronyism, then that presupposes your arguments about my experience. I hope you see that, right? That has to be our starting point. And so if the jobs are guarded, the closest anyone can get is as a player. The combination of characteristics needed to be a coach makes it extremely difficult to get into this position to be tested.
Obviously I'm not a professional player or in the t2 scene, but I'm old. You know how creepy it would be to try to get on a team as a player? To try to befriend a random 20 year old? You have to see that as almost impossible. Plus I have bills. Everything about the tier 2 scene cannot work with my current arrangement.
So both of my angles are blocked. You cannot apply for these jobs because I saw, those do not get responses. There's not a single person I've talked to about my situation who doesn't understand why I wouldn't have at least have got a "wtf is this" instead of nothing. Once again, you hit the nail on the head with the comment about the experience or clout. The purpose of the document being large was to make a splash. It did but with the wrong audience.
You have to also understand, that even at your level, you see a difference in your knowledge vs. the rest of the community. If you're smart enough to see the cronyism then you're smart enough to recognize that. So I hope that in that demonstration you can also see that there are levels above you. That there are things in this game that you don't understand. This is something one of the pros pointed out to me, the audience was wrong. And ofc I go the response I did from the community.
But I expected better from people who are in the know. People who understand that the game is not mechanical and it requires critical thinking. As someone who passed the California Bar Exam, I would hope that leans me in the direction of someone who understands critical thinking. One of the biggest points you need to understand that data by itself, is not enough. You need someone behind that data who is good at manipulating it to make it make sense. To be good at manipulating it you need experience. I have both qualities.
I'm not sure if you're into strategy as a intellectual subject but there are two figures that probably represent us in our argument fairly well.
Just to quickly summarize, Jomini was someone who believed war was a matter of geometry and could be won with direct application of certain principles. Clausewitz was someone who was practiced at losing in war and saw it more as an art form.
The reason I'm bringing this up is that I think that you can sell people on the right way of doing things. People can be very persuasive for $100,000/year. It's the "trust the process" argument. The problem with this is that like in the Jomini and Clausewitz intellectual debate, at the end of the day war is chaotic. More data is always preferred. And that's why producing a 115 page document is not to share with the players. It's to have data readily available to interpret their successes and failures. I'm not sure how you feel about "solutions" but so often they require multiple perspectives over one. I don't know one successful company that is just a bunch of one man armies.
And in my professional and gaming life, I've never, EVER, ran into a situation where doing the bare minimum produced good results. I have also never seen someone overdo something. I have more than a thousand times seen friends, co-workers, acquaintances and family members give them self foot of rope after foot of rope trying to convince themselves that doing less is objectively better for them. It never is.
m4 [#12]1999, CS whatever version. Mr Steal Your Girl in art class. I know people think I'm a random. But without me, esports would look different.
im crying this mf really the best rage baiter oat or hes some 35 year old white man😭
m4 [#46]Okay, you want this to be constructive, right? I'll keep trying with you. It's weird you don't see my effort but okay...
If you agree with my stance on cronyism, then that presupposes your arguments about my experience. I hope you see that, right? That has to be our starting point. And so if the jobs are guarded, the closest anyone can get is as a player. The combination of characteristics needed to be a coach makes it extremely difficult to get into this position to be tested.
Obviously I'm not a professional player or in the t2 scene, but I'm old. You know how creepy it would be to try to get on a team as a player? To try to befriend a random 20 year old? You have to see that as almost impossible. Plus I have bills. Everything about the tier 2 scene cannot work with my current arrangement.
So both of my angles are blocked. You cannot apply for these jobs because I saw, those do not get responses. There's not a single person I've talked to about my situation who doesn't understand why I wouldn't have at least have got a "wtf is this" instead of nothing. Once again, you hit the nail on the head with the comment about the experience or clout. The purpose of the document being large was to make a splash. It did but with the wrong audience.
You have to also understand, that even at your level, you see a difference in your knowledge vs. the rest of the community. If you're smart enough to see the cronyism then you're smart enough to recognize that. So I hope that in that demonstration you can also see that there are levels above you. That there are things in this game that you don't understand. This is something one of the pros pointed out to me, the audience was wrong. And ofc I go the response I did from the community.
But I expected better from people who are in the know. People who understand that the game is not mechanical and it requires critical thinking. As someone who passed the California Bar Exam, I would hope that leans me in the direction of someone who understands critical thinking. One of the biggest points you need to understand that data by itself, is not enough. You need someone behind that data who is good at manipulating it to make it make sense. To be good at manipulating it you need experience. I have both qualities.
I'm not sure if you're into strategy as a intellectual subject but there are two figures that probably represent us in our argument fairly well.
Just to quickly summarize, Jomini was someone who believed war was a matter of geometry and could be won with direct application of certain principles. Clausewitz was someone who was practiced at losing in war and saw it more as an art form.
The reason I'm bringing this up is that I think that you can sell people on the right way of doing things. People can be very persuasive for $100,000/year. It's the "trust the process" argument. The problem with this is that like in the Jomini and Clausewitz intellectual debate, at the end of the day war is chaotic. More data is always preferred. And that's why producing a 115 page document is not to share with the players. It's to have data readily available to interpret their successes and failures. I'm not sure how you feel about "solutions" but so often they require multiple perspectives over one. I don't know one successful company that is just a bunch of one man armies.
And in my professional and gaming life, I've never, EVER, ran into a situation where doing the bare minimum produced good results. I have also never seen someone overdo something. I have more than a thousand times seen friends, co-workers, acquaintances and family members give them self foot of rope after foot of rope trying to convince themselves that doing less is objectively better for them. It never is.
holy fucking shit this thread gets better and more iconic every scroll😭😭😭
FusionLULW [#48]holy fucking shit this thread gets better and more iconic every scroll😭😭😭
Why are you pretending like you can read this :)
FusionLULW [#48]holy fucking shit this thread gets better and more iconic every scroll😭😭😭
I’m actually crying at this bro, he sounds like some washed up uncle at a family gathering talking about how he could have gone pro if he hadn’t injured himself
Like he has to be rage baiting surely
Uncleben [#50]I’m actually crying at this bro, he sounds like some washed up uncle at a family gathering talking about how he could have gone pro if he hadn’t injured himself
Like he has to be rage baiting surely
Pseudo-intellectual lost. Sad day. You'll get 'em next time champ!
m4 [#49]Why are you pretending like you can read this :)
what does that even mean😭
Uncleben [#50]I’m actually crying at this bro, he sounds like some washed up uncle at a family gathering talking about how he could have gone pro if he hadn’t injured himself
Like he has to be rage baiting surely
high school glory trying his best to relive-it vibes
m4 [#51]Pseudo-intellectual lost. Sad day. You'll get 'em next time champ!
I just don’t want to spend more time arguing with someone who’s so convinced they are smarter than everyone else; it’s very hard to come to agreement with someones who’s head is that far up their own ass. By your own admission, a 100 page document was not effective. You also seem to think in black and white; as if the only two options are a 1 page report or a 100 page report. Why wouldn’t you submit a compact summary of your map theory (and removing complete nonsense about the history of the map), and then deep dive once you are accepted? From 100t’s perspective, you are a completely unknown person with no resume who submitted a 100 page document that starts with complete nonsense. Can you see why they didn’t take you seriously? I’m not even saying your ideas are nonsense btw.
If an established coach like Chet or potter submitted the same 100 page document, they might be taken more seriously, but even they would get criticism. Hard work isn’t simply writing every single thing down and trying to overwhelm your audience with how smart you are, it’s about knowing how to get your audience to actually listen to you, a skill in which you are clearly lacking.
Uncleben [#54]I just don’t want to spend more time arguing with someone who’s so convinced they are smarter than everyone else; it’s very hard to come to agreement with someones who’s head is that far up their own ass. By your own admission, a 100 page document was not effective. You also seem to think in black and white; as if the only two options are a 1 page report or a 100 page report. Why wouldn’t you submit a compact summary of your map theory (and removing complete nonsense about the history of the map), and then deep dive once you are accepted? From 100t’s perspective, you are a completely unknown person with no resume who submitted a 100 page document that starts with complete nonsense. Can you see why they didn’t take you seriously? I’m not even saying your ideas are nonsense btw.
If an established coach like Chet or potter submitted the same 100 page document, they might be taken more seriously, but even they would get criticism. Hard work isn’t simply writing every single thing down and trying to overwhelm your audience with how smart you are, it’s about knowing how to get your audience to actually listen to you, a skill in which you are clearly lacking.
The description was put there to balance the document. The funniest thing about that is that LLMs are trained on the responses from Reddit. That's why the self-own is so funny and why I can't get mad. That's communities description of Icebox :)
By my own admission? I gave them the benefit of the doubt to be knowers. The last great test of my hypothesis of cronyism.
And there was never a moment where they actually said they looked at it. That's the real crime. When I found that I didn't get a callback and they found people, I reached out to others. Similar stories. Pretending they did an actual call and that Zikz actually believed what he said in the quote, is crazy.
"We are looking for someone that exactly fits the system that we're trying to build at 100 Thieves. We believe that person could be someone that's not already deeply involved in the ecosystem and we wanted to be open to that possibility by making this an open call."
They found a t2 coach and a radiant player...
Come on man... Do you actually believe they went through all the applications if they found a t2 coach and a radiant player?
m4 [#55]The description was put there to balance the document. The funniest thing about that is that LLMs are trained on the responses from Reddit. That's why the self-own is so funny and why I can't get mad. That's communities description of Icebox :)
By my own admission? I gave them the benefit of the doubt to be knowers. The last great test of my hypothesis of cronyism.
And there was never a moment where they actually said they looked at it. That's the real crime. When I found that I didn't get a callback and they found people, I reached out to others. Similar stories. Pretending they did an actual call and that Zikz actually believed what he said in the quote, is crazy.
"We are looking for someone that exactly fits the system that we're trying to build at 100 Thieves. We believe that person could be someone that's not already deeply involved in the ecosystem and we wanted to be open to that possibility by making this an open call."
They found a t2 coach and a radiant player...
Come on man... Do you actually believe they went through all the applications if they found a t2 coach and a radiant player?
The quote is literally the coaching's worlds "Project A is our character-based tactical shooter. It's competitive, it has precise gun play."