ez for LAZ
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.10 1.93 | 319 245 469 | 19 11 8 | / 12 8 4 / | 8 4 4 | +7 +3 +4 | 78% 67% 100% | 201 139 326 | 25% 17% 35% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.13 1.06 1.27 | 187 163 237 | 12 8 4 | / 12 7 5 / | 9 5 4 | 0 +1 -1 | 83% 75% 100% | 121 114 135 | 19% 20% 18% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.12 1.08 1.20 | 184 191 173 | 11 8 3 | / 10 8 2 / | 8 5 3 | +1 0 +1 | 72% 58% 100% | 132 134 128 | 20% 23% 17% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.01 0.88 1.27 | 200 210 182 | 13 9 4 | / 10 8 2 / | 4 1 3 | +3 +1 +2 | 67% 58% 83% | 138 133 149 | 19% 26% 0% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.93 0.70 1.39 | 191 218 139 | 13 9 4 | / 12 11 1 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -2 +3 | 78% 75% 83% | 106 122 76 | 31% 32% 30% | 5 4 1 | 2 1 1 | +3 +3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 0.56 1.58 | 272 144 337 | 17 3 14 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 3 4 | +2 -3 +5 | 78% 67% 83% | 146 70 184 | 22% 50% 19% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.22 1.48 1.10 | 220 252 205 | 14 5 9 | / 12 4 8 / | 4 1 3 | +2 +1 +1 | 78% 83% 75% | 160 167 156 | 47% 56% 43% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.75 0.63 0.81 | 176 89 220 | 9 2 7 | / 14 4 10 / | 5 1 4 | -5 -2 -3 | 61% 50% 67% | 129 87 150 | 38% 38% 39% | 2 0 2 | 4 2 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.74 0.77 0.73 | 150 180 135 | 9 4 5 | / 13 5 8 / | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | 67% 50% 75% | 109 94 117 | 31% 27% 33% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.59 0.03 0.90 | 128 31 177 | 7 0 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 2 4 | -7 -6 -1 | 50% 33% 58% | 90 26 121 | 23% 0% 27% | 1 0 1 | 5 3 2 | -4 -3 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.10 1.93 1.38 | 319 245 469 | 19 11 8 | / 12 8 4 / | 8 4 4 | +7 +3 +4 | 78% 67% 100% | 201 139 326 | 25% 17% 35% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.06 1.27 1.13 | 187 163 237 | 12 8 4 | / 12 7 5 / | 9 5 4 | 0 +1 -1 | 83% 75% 100% | 121 114 135 | 19% 20% 18% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.08 1.20 1.12 | 184 191 173 | 11 8 3 | / 10 8 2 / | 8 5 3 | +1 0 +1 | 72% 58% 100% | 132 134 128 | 20% 23% 17% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.88 1.27 1.01 | 200 210 182 | 13 9 4 | / 10 8 2 / | 4 1 3 | +3 +1 +2 | 67% 58% 83% | 138 133 149 | 19% 26% 0% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.70 1.39 0.93 | 191 218 139 | 13 9 4 | / 12 11 1 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -2 +3 | 78% 75% 83% | 106 122 76 | 31% 32% 30% | 5 4 1 | 2 1 1 | +3 +3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.56 1.58 1.24 | 272 144 337 | 17 3 14 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 3 4 | +2 -3 +5 | 78% 67% 83% | 146 70 184 | 22% 50% 19% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.48 1.10 1.22 | 220 252 205 | 14 5 9 | / 12 4 8 / | 4 1 3 | +2 +1 +1 | 78% 83% 75% | 160 167 156 | 47% 56% 43% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.63 0.81 0.75 | 176 89 220 | 9 2 7 | / 14 4 10 / | 5 1 4 | -5 -2 -3 | 61% 50% 67% | 129 87 150 | 38% 38% 39% | 2 0 2 | 4 2 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.77 0.73 0.74 | 150 180 135 | 9 4 5 | / 13 5 8 / | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | 67% 50% 75% | 109 94 117 | 31% 27% 33% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.03 0.90 0.59 | 128 31 177 | 7 0 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 2 4 | -7 -6 -1 | 50% 33% 58% | 90 26 121 | 23% 0% 27% | 1 0 1 | 5 3 2 | -4 -3 -1 |
nutab1e [#5]it's so over dawg
wolfen cannot play fucking initiator just don't even try that shit
Its groupstage. why not try out new stuff before playoffs
Mortadelo [#7]Well if that is the thought process you might as well do it in the playoffs too because they don’t matter either. Only split 2 counts towards ascension it’s fucking terrible
Wait is there no circuit point system or smth like that?
Liem [#10]Wait is there no circuit point system or smth like that?
Yes but I believe they only work for demotion not to see who makes ascension. The 2 finalist of the 2nd split go to ascension
Mortadelo [#11]Yes but I believe they only work for demotion not to see who makes ascension. The 2 finalist of the 2nd split go to ascension
There are circuit points for each split dw lmao
Mortadelo [#8]Been saying it for a while Zeta’s potential is great
You know how we roll Mortadelo, always rough starts and problems with roles but at the end we always make it work
Kirya [#12]There are circuit points for each split dw lmao
Yes there is but it does not matter for ascension. The 2 finalists of the second split go to ascension, winner straight to ascension and runner up to the play in
nutab1e [#5]it's so over dawg
wolfen cannot play fucking initiator just don't even try that shit
Wolfen is literally sova main.
FTREFORMED [#13]You know how we roll Mortadelo, always rough starts and problems with roles but at the end we always make it work
Well, hope it keeps working out, taking it slowly shouldn’t be an issue, sometimes people just need more patience