Quick 2 -0 for SEN GG wp... will be over before 5:30
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
6
2
+4
|
6
5
+1
|
6
7
-1
|
8
4
+4
|
9
3
+6
|
TenZ
SEN
|
8
2
+6
|
8
5
+3
|
5
5
+0
|
11
6
+5
|
6
4
+2
|
dapr
SEN
|
9
0
+9
|
6
5
+1
|
4
4
+0
|
2
6
-4
|
7
4
+3
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
10
2
+8
|
6
4
+2
|
4
6
-2
|
2
8
-6
|
zombs
SEN
|
2
3
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
6
4
+2
|
5
7
-2
|
6
7
-1
|
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
|
2
1
+1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
3
2
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
2
1
+1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
1
2
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
|
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
11
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
64
|
3
|
1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
5
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
104
|
2
|
5
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
1
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
0
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
2
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
3
|
1
|
Lakia
NU
|
|
7
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
3
|
1
|
allow
NU
|
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
0
|
0
|
Suggest
NU
|
|
3
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
1
|
0
|
peri
NU
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
2
|
1
|
solo
NU
|
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
6
|
1
|
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
1
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
4
4
+0
|
4
3
+1
|
7
0
+7
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
0
+4
|
5
2
+3
|
2
4
-2
|
4
4
+0
|
4
2
+2
|
dapr
SEN
|
6
0
+6
|
3
2
+1
|
1
2
-1
|
2
3
-1
|
3
1
+2
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
4
1
+3
|
1
3
-2
|
2
5
-3
|
2
2
+0
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
4
4
+0
|
3
5
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
2
0
+2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
0
2
-2
|
|
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
7
Round 1
allow
Lakia
Round 2
allow
Lakia
Round 3
Lakia
allow
Round 13
solo
allow
Round 14
Suggest
peri
Round 15
Lakia
peri
Round 18
Suggest
peri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
1
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
3
Round 7
Lakia
solo
Round 11
Lakia
peri
Round 15
allow
solo
|
2
Round 8
solo
allow
Suggest
Round 16
peri
Suggest
Lakia
|
|
|
|
1
Round 7
Lakia
solo
|
|
|
|
105
|
1
|
3
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
1
Round 5
allow
Lakia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
0
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
Round 6
allow
Suggest
Round 7
peri
Suggest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
2
Round 9
solo
allow
peri
Round 13
Lakia
peri
Suggest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
3
|
0
|
Lakia
NU
|
|
4
Round 4
TenZ
dapr
Round 7
ShahZaM
zombs
Round 9
dapr
ShahZaM
Round 12
zombs
ShahZaM
|
1
Round 2
SicK
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
2
|
1
|
allow
NU
|
|
1
Round 4
ShahZaM
SicK
|
1
Round 12
SicK
dapr
TenZ
|
|
|
1
Round 16
SicK
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
0
|
0
|
Suggest
NU
|
|
2
Round 6
TenZ
zombs
Round 16
dapr
ShahZaM
|
2
Round 10
SicK
zombs
TenZ
Round 13
zombs
SicK
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
1
|
0
|
peri
NU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
0
|
0
|
solo
NU
|
|
|
1
Round 3
ShahZaM
TenZ
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
4
|
0
|
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
1
+2
|
4
3
+1
|
2
3
-1
|
4
1
+3
|
2
3
-1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
2
+2
|
3
3
+0
|
3
1
+2
|
7
2
+5
|
2
2
+0
|
dapr
SEN
|
3
0
+3
|
3
3
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
0
3
-3
|
4
3
+1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
6
1
+5
|
5
1
+4
|
2
1
+1
|
0
6
-6
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
3
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
6
4
+2
|
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
peri
NU
|
allow
NU
|
Suggest
NU
|
Lakia
NU
|
solo
NU
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
4
Round 2
peri
allow
Round 13
allow
Lakia
Round 16
Lakia
Suggest
Round 17
Lakia
peri
|
1
Round 6
allow
Lakia
peri
|
|
|
|
1
Round 1
Lakia
solo
|
|
|
|
80
|
2
|
1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
2
Round 7
Suggest
allow
Round 15
Lakia
allow
|
2
Round 5
allow
solo
peri
Round 12
solo
allow
Lakia
|
|
|
1
Round 5
peri
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
1
|
2
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
3
Round 8
allow
peri
Round 10
Lakia
Suggest
Round 17
Suggest
allow
|
1
Round 4
Lakia
Suggest
allow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
1
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
Round 5
Lakia
Suggest
Round 8
Suggest
solo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
0
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
2
Round 10
allow
solo
Round 15
solo
peri
|
1
Round 9
peri
Suggest
solo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
0
|
1
|
Lakia
NU
|
|
3
Round 3
dapr
ShahZaM
Round 5
dapr
TenZ
Round 12
zombs
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
1
|
0
|
allow
NU
|
|
2
Round 3
SicK
TenZ
Round 9
TenZ
SicK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
0
|
0
|
Suggest
NU
|
|
1
Round 10
SicK
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
0
|
0
|
peri
NU
|
|
1
Round 14
zombs
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
2
|
1
|
solo
NU
|
|
3
Round 2
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 14
TenZ
dapr
Round 15
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
1
Round 1
SicK
dapr
zombs
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
2
|
1
|
usually teams dont like bind because the lack of a mid creates a lot 50/50 plays where you tp x5 and its probably the best map to pick if your a worse team and want to win a lot of rounds. its a real puggy map and the thing is sentinels arguably has the best individually talented players in the world so they will always squeeze out the win
lakia is the only player that plays to his potential this tourney on nuturn....
the rest are underperforming so hard, can clearly see them being so nervous cus their aim is so shaky and off
i knew it was probs gonna be 2-0 sentinels but thought it woulda been a little closer than this :l
them performing like this make me wish VS was here instead
happy Sentinels won but boring game
It all started with those weird quarter-finals pairings. For all the "NA vs EU hype" the organizers basically 'made' these ridiculous seedings, where SEN/fnatic/Liquid/V1 had to play each other early. Meanwhile NUTURN luck'ed out with the Sharks pairing, the second worst team in the tournament. The fact that teams like Vikings, Sharks and X10 got straight into Upper quarter-finals, while fnatic and Version1 had to play an extra match just to get there (and paired against Sentinels and Liquid), is really really strange.