imo its KOREA. DRX; theyve been the most overrated. every tournament since m3 theres always a huge amount of people saying "DRX is gonna win their teamwork and strats are unbeatable" and get proven wrong every time
12
most overrated region?
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Cheasle2 [#3]Korea is consistently above or equal to multiple EU and NA teams at every event tf are you on about?
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Cheasle2 [#3]Korea is consistently above or equal to multiple EU and NA teams at every event tf are you on about?
bro what? they got grouped in champions and idk who tf even beat them in m3 thats how forgettable it was 💀
Cheasle2 [#3]Korea is consistently above or equal to multiple EU and NA teams at every event tf are you on about?
bro is on an illegal amount of drugs right now
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj [#6]i think it's because drx is good in scrims. that's why everyone says that they're good
viewers don't have access to scrim wins/losses + i mainly heard gambit was doing good in scrims
RonaldMcDonald [#8]bro is on an illegal amount of drugs right now
OMG RONALD! DO YOU PUT ILLEGAL AMOUNTS OF DRUGS IN YOUR CHICKEN NUGGETS?
iehn [#9]viewers don't have access to scrim wins/losses + i mainly heard gambit was doing good in scrims
I've heard plenty of pros say that drx is good in scrims.
iehn [#11]OMG RONALD! DO YOU PUT ILLEGAL AMOUNTS OF DRUGS IN YOUR CHICKEN NUGGETS?
my chicken nuggets are made of chicken, metal, and cocaine only
iehn [#9]viewers don't have access to scrim wins/losses + i mainly heard gambit was doing good in scrims
VS are notable scrim demons. Any pro player/team/coach will say that DRX are the strongest scrim opponents. nAts said it, G2 said it, TL said it, suygetsu said it, PRX said it, Laz said it, the list goes on.
thatpower [#2]fpx was overrated since the beginning
Can I ask how FPX is overrated, since I've seen this same narrative quite a lot for some unknown reason? They won last stage of EMEA and have been second best so far in stage 2 of EMEA.
Unless you mean their time last year?
archetype [#10]They lost a close 2-1 vs Gambit, who would win the tournament without dropping a single map in playoffs, except for that match.
DRX as a team can compete with any team from EU or NA , Still Korea as a region is nowhere near NA or EU.
Pixsy [#13]NA
We only won cuz we had a TenZ the first time then we won cuz we had a yay and chet and marved
we've at least won something
patuj [#16]Can I ask how FPX is overrated, since I've seen this same narrative quite a lot for some unknown reason? They won last stage of EMEA and have been second best so far in stage 2 of EMEA.
Unless you mean their time last year?
baiting
Pixsy [#13]NA
We only won cuz we had a TenZ the first time then we won cuz we had a yay and chet and marved
"we only won because we had a" -proceeds to list mvps for both iceland tourneys
emea. yea they had results 6-8 months ago but now everyone thinks they are great because of teams in the same region beating each other. do i think they are good? of course. but they didn't even make top4 last lan. yea i know fpx wasnt there but they acted like they were gonna dogwalk everyone regardless and that did not happen. i do think they will be better because they have something to prove.
archetype [#10]They lost a close 2-1 vs Gambit, who would win the tournament without dropping a single map in playoffs, except for that match.
That gambit literally lost to 100t
number1_anuj_fan [#26]South asia.
Rossi stans praised him like hes better then yay.
Truth is, he got outclassed by jetts from the weakest subregion in asia (HK-TW).
Also south asian teams have a pretty lame record in APAC challengers till now, being able to win a single match each time .
Bro South Asia only played APAC Challenger ones and By time we progress
Cheasle2 [#3]Korea is consistently above or equal to multiple EU and NA teams at every event tf are you on about?
EU: 2 International titles
NA: 2 International titles
Korea: 1 Top 3 finish
kristof [#22]NA
people think the whole region is good when they only have 1 decent team
EG > OpTic > any other region team
ritiknayak [#29]Bro South Asia only played APAC Challenger ones and By time we progress
one APAC and one LCQ
number1_anuj_fan [#26]South asia.
Rossi stans praised him like hes better then yay.
Truth is, he got outclassed by jetts from the weakest subregion in asia (HK-TW).
Also south asian teams have a pretty lame record in APAC challengers till now, being able to win a single match each time .
GES beat Damwon and almost beat f4q
kushcash0331 [#35]EU: 2 International titles
NA: 2 International titles
Korea: 1 Top 3 finish
look at NA and EU's second seed at every tournament and revisit my original comment.
OzyMeister [#34]Korea
DRX is no doubt a world class team but I don't think the rest of the region is that good
its been 2+ years now and the team has barely lost to anyone locally
ngl i want Damwon to qual for Masters 2. Might be more exciting.
hiyo [#41]GES beat Damwon and almost beat f4q
Then went on to lose all 4 maps to the weakest subregion and get 0-13'd by prx.
number1_anuj_fan [#44]Then went on to lose all 4 maps to the weakest subregion and get 0-13'd by prx.
what weakest subregion?
i thought it's SA
archetype [#43]ngl i want Damwon to qual for Masters 2. Might be more exciting.
likewise want new teams from Korea to play internationally
archetype [#10]They lost a close 2-1 vs Gambit, who would win the tournament without dropping a single map in playoffs, except for that match.
not a very close 2-1 tbh, lost 13-3 and 13-8 and the 13-8 they won both pistols
duchesssx [#24]emea. yea they had results 6-8 months ago but now everyone thinks they are great because of teams in the same region beating each other. do i think they are good? of course. but they didn't even make top4 last lan. yea i know fpx wasnt there but they acted like they were gonna dogwalk everyone regardless and that did not happen. i do think they will be better because they have something to prove.
idk why you're getting downvoted when you are speaking facts
juraf [#48]not a very close 2-1 tbh, lost 13-3 and 13-8 and the 13-8 they won both pistols
it was p close. scoreline doesnt show it.
Cheasle2 [#42]look at NA and EU's second seed at every tournament and revisit my original comment.
The point still stands
Pixsy [#13]NA
We only won cuz we had a TenZ the first time then we won cuz we had a yay and chet and marved
that's an ass take
ItsaMe [#54]NA won masters twice, what are u on about
masters 1&2 is the most overrated trophy in esport
iehn [#7]bro what? they got grouped in champions and idk who tf even beat them in m3 thats how forgettable it was 💀
how is he wrong. every time they lost to na/eu team there was a 13-11 map, with the series going to 3 games (besides gambit). that's legit the definition of close
Mkin11 [#4]??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
how is he wrong. every time they lost to na/eu team there was a 13-11 map, with the series going to 3 games (besides gambit). that's legit the definition of close
RonaldMcDonald [#8]bro is on an illegal amount of drugs right now
how is he wrong. every time they lost to na/eu team there was a 13-11 map, with the series going to 3 games (besides gambit). that's legit the definition of close
jimjam789 [#62]how is he wrong. every time they lost to na/eu team there was a 13-11 map, with the series going to 3 games (besides gambit). that's legit the definition of close
Yea but he said above or equal
jimjam789 [#67]remember they 2-0ed acend therefore 'above'
So above one time = consistently above ?
luckypleb [#59]I actually asked cause i don't remember, was it HKTW?
never really watched them play . so I'm not the best person to answer
jimjam789 [#61]how is he wrong. every time they lost to na/eu team there was a 13-11 map, with the series going to 3 games (besides gambit). that's legit the definition of close
Don't worry bro VLR users don't actually watch the games, they just look at player ACS and team placements to educate all of their opinions.
archetype [#51]it was p close. scoreline doesnt show it.
Scoreline is what makes a game close lmao, unless it's at least 13-10 it was not a close game
Giannero [#76]Scoreline is what makes a game close lmao, unless it's at least 13-10 it was not a close game
nah bro. zeta vs g2 is a good recent example of how scoreline doesn't show how close a game is. x10c vs gambit.
you can win multiple rounds by 1 hp, or with 0.01 seconds, or with just 1 man. Valorant is a largely momentum based game, one lucky round after another and the scoreline suggests domination. In reality, it's a lot closer than people expect. It's almost a fallacy to judge a team off of their scorelines instead of how they actually play the game. 100T vs The Guard is a good example of people giving too much smoke after judging the scorelines.
archetype [#32]in playoffs
why does that matter? I'm not invalidating what you are saying I'm just saying gambit were not as good as you are making it out to be
Discord