bro dropped 52 kills and lost the map 😭
| Country: | Australia |
| Registered: | June 10, 2023 |
| Last post: | May 9, 2024 at 8:48 AM |
| Posts: | 6502 |
bro dropped 52 kills and lost the map 😭
BREAKING: Natus Vincere "enhanced training" regiment leaked:
8am - Group masturbation
9am - Group masturbation
10am - Group masturbation
11am - Group masturbation
12pm - Group masturbation
1pm - Vod review
2pm - Group masturbation
3pm - Group masturbation
4pm - Group masturbation
5pm - Group masturbation
6pm - Deathmatch
7pm - Scrimmage
8pm - Scrimmage
9pm - Group masturbation
10pm - Review demo
11pm - Solo masturbation
good list but fade gotta be top 3 for sure
what is happening with players dropping 30 today
Louds best player is a controller. Doesn't mean shit
they need a new fucking coach and a vibes guy
if y0ys on chamber then he drops 40
100t aint making top 3 bucko
also tl are ass
which team did worse compared to them?? what?
sen > geng
prx > loud
top 4 at madrid was even between NA and apac.
But 3rd best NA which is NRG/LOUD is better than drx.
but mid of the pack team like rrq is better than americas mid of the pack like g2.
but the worse 2 apac teams are not better than the worse 2 NA teams (although this one is not clear and could change)
APACs 5th team was not excluded as APAC did not have a 5th team at any of the international events.
we are getting our contract finalised with riot for 2025. Bleed will leave esports next year and disorder will replace them for the 2025 season.
Excluding EMEA's worst-performing team would skew the data in favour of EMEA, as they would have a higher chance of achieving better average placements with fewer teams.
this should be a pretty basic concept to understand. NA education lacking
Also I don't wanna be that guy but why are you saying "MATHs", it' should be "math". NA education lacking.
CHAMPS 23: Avg Placement with or w/o FNC/PRX: APAC > EMEA
EMEA: FNC(4), FUT(7), NAVI(9), GIA(9), LIQ(13)
APAC: PRX(3), DRX(5), T1(9), ZETA (13)
TOKYO: Avg Placement with or w/o FNC/PRX: APAC > EMEA
EMEA: FNC(1), TL(5), FUT(9), NAVI(11).
APAC: PRX(3), DRX(7), T1(9)
LOCK//IN: Avg Placement with or w/o FNC/PRX: EMEA > APAC
EMEA: FNC(1), NAVI(3), VIT(9), FUT(9), GIA(9), KC(9), KOI(17), TL(17), BBL(17), TH(17)
APAC: DRX(3), TLN(5), TS(9), all 7 other APAC teams (17)
therefor the statement that "EMEA has a better average placement in 2023 AT ALL EVENTS than APAC regardless of if you include or exclude EMEA and APAC's best team" is wrong
your just speculating but I agree.
remember my point is that emea was a one team region in 2023.
Even though EMEAs worst teams is most likely better than apacs worst teams, my point still stands
🗣️speak up king. rise above emea hate
Why do u keep cherry picking data?
that is true but you are just speculating and I think you forgot that I believe emea was better in 2023 but my whole argument about all this is that apac is better if you exclude prx and fnc.
and so I would consider emea a one team region
you forgot zeta in reykjavik
I agree but yet again my point is that if u get rid of apac and emeas best team then apac would be the better overall region in 2023
Excluding EMEA's worst-performing team would skew the data in favor of EMEA, as they would have a higher chance of achieving better average placements with fewer teams.
I don't agree with your last sentence but I now see that I made a mistake and that emea has indeed made it to top 4 in 3 different occasions out of the last 7 international events if you exclude fnc.
Yes it is true that it's slightly unfair that I included the top 5 emea teams but not top 5 apacs but that's because it's impossible without making either emeas or apacs average biased.
It's like if you invite all of the 10 emea teams to champs 2023 but keep the same amount of apac and americas teams.
Emea would have an even greater chance of getting into the top 4 for example but their average placement would be lower. I'm sure you can see how if u exclude emeas worst performing team in the event it messes up the data.
CHAMPS 23: Avg Placement with or w/o FNC/PRX: APAC > EMEA
EMEA: FNC(4), FUT(7), NAVI(9), GIA(9), LIQ(13)
APAC: PRX(3), DRX(5), T1(9), ZETA (13)
TOKYO: Avg Placement with or w/o FNC/PRX: APAC > EMEA
EMEA: FNC(1), TL(5), FUT(9), NAVI(11).
APAC: PRX(3), DRX(7), T1(9)
LOCK//IN: Avg Placement with or w/o FNC: EMEA > APAC
EMEA: FNC(1), NAVI(3), VIT(9), FUT(9), GIA(9), KC(9), KOI(17), TL(17), BBL(17), TH(17)
APAC: DRX(3), TLN(5), TS(9), all 7 other APAC teams (17)
overall apac had a higher placement with or w/o fnc and prx
TOKYO: Avg Placement with or w/o FNC/PRX: APAC > EMEA
EMEA: FNC(1), TL(5), FUT(9), NAVI(11).
APAC: PRX(3), DRX(7), T1(9)
LOCK//IN: Avg Placement with or w/o FNC: EMEA > APAC
EMEA: FNC(1), NAVI(3), VIT(9), FUT(9), GIA(9), KC(9), KOI(17), TL(17), BBL(17), TH(17)
APAC: DRX(3), TLN(5), TS(9), all 7 other APAC teams (17)
Your cherry picking the data in your favour for your first response but when you include the full data set apac had a better year.
I replied in the right place as you say emea placed top 4 since 2022 excluding fnc but then you bring up fncs champs run as a top 4 emea run. You also include fpx as top 4 as they had visa issues when in reality they might have not made top 4.
Agreed with the first part but it doesn't prove anything to do with the argument.
your group argument just proves my point and you can't bring up inconsistency and weaklings as an excuse for a loss and a reason why your region is better.
fut was EMEAs 2nd best placing team in champs????
my point is that emea was a one team region and apac is not
the quality of teams were shit for emea in 2023 apart from one????
apac had a higher average ranking in international tournaments when you exclude both emea and apacs best team.
talk about "top heavy"
if you exclude fnc from the picture you guys would have only made it to top 4 at an international event TWICE from now until the start of 2022.
thats 2 out of 7 events that you guys made top 4. (excluding fnc).
We can do the same for apacs best team which is paper rex.
Out of the last 7 international events apac excluding prx would have made it 4 times, including prx and it's 7 out of 7.
Apac has double the amount of top 4 appearances if you exclude each regions best team.
To me it sounds like emea is just a one team region.
TOP 4 PLACEMENTS APAC: 9
TOP 4 PLACEMENTS EMEA: 7
this is since the start of 2022.
Basically emea has been the worst region out of apac/emea/americas from 2022 to 2024.
The only year you guys haven't been the worst region for top 4 placements is 2021
Sayf
cloud
aspas
Boostio
Meiy (dfm might be good now tho)
mwzera
keznit
jawgemo
stew
Sscary
mako
Jemkin
Rb
and Havoc (I hope he finds a better team soon bc he is crazy good, especially on Kayo).
something called a bad game.
very hard concept to understand
disorder would still clear
I'm very realistic
DISORDER CLEARS MINIMISE AND FRIENDS
Aspas
Yay
Saadhak
Forsaken
Sayf
Demon1 isnt on my list bc this is supposed to be off all time and so rookies should not be on the list.
For example if we did this ranking 2 years ago then Mako or derke would be probably top 3 on this list.
yes this is assuming sen only wins 3 out of their 9 remaining games
technically they need 14 but whatever.
If nrg wins all the games this season and next they will have 10 points. If nrg then don't make top 3 in playoffs for split 2 and sen also dont make top 3 in playoffs for split 2 then nrg would qualify to champs and sen don't. If nrg also wins shanghai sen would then need 14 points to out beat them assuming this very unlikely event happens.
if sen win 4 more games they are guaranteed to make it to champs
goes to a map 3
havoc is better also this heats first time on kayo ever
Discord