how r ppl putting PAC > EMEA?

"amer > emea" is understandable
"prx > all emea teams but their owners (NAVI)" is understandable

but right now, Pacific > Emea is brainded no?

too early to talk abou this. wait for bbl and m8 play

In terms of individual prowess. Pacific is on top.

nope... Ranking is like this amer>fnatic>apac>china>memea

Is it? In the tournament yea maybe, but we also haven't seen how BBL and NS played and they may hit the ball rolling or crumble as first seeds. As for the longer term, EMEA has consistently choked at the international level.

youre right pacific = PRX

i think emea is slightly better

its 2026 and im still seeing "sentinelmain" posting on vlr

you gotta remember pacific still has like 3 teams who could have taken at least a series in this masters (rrq fs drx), and a lot of solid teams in GE DFM and “theoretically” Gen G. Whereas emea has fnatic th and vit who all sound good on paper but the last two aren’t looking as good as they should and fnatic haven’t adjusted to the micro heavy meta as well as the others. Going into masters london i think it’s possible for emea>apac to be a no brainer tho

unfortunately the navi you call owners of paper rex haven't qualed to an event since the plumber era in fact half that is either retired or in tier 2

at santiago emea > apac

in general apac > emea

emea is way less competitive and are much more bottom-heavy (ULF, PCF, FUT) than APAC imo

in general i though the level of play was higher in apac, and i think other teams could have done some damage at Santiago (RRQ, DFM, GE, DRX) more so than emea teams that didnt qual

when I watch separately EMEA looked better region from all. but when come to internationals Apac teams usually own emea teams. specially emea rookie teams. only fnatic do better usually against pacific teams because thier slow playstyle

its because they have eyes dickhead

we gotta wait for NS and BBL imo