Similar to HLTV, most MVPs will go to the winner but you don't necessarily have to win the event as long as you are clearly the best player and had a deep run
Masters Reykjavík 21': Tenz, 1.35 rating, 1.02 KPR, won the event undefeated
Masters Berlin: Yay: 1.33 rating, lost the final but was miles ahead of everyone
Champions Berlin: CNed: 1.15 rating, won event
Masters Reykjavík 22': Yay, 1.19 rating, won event
Masters Copenhagen: Shao, 1.19 rating, won event
Champions Istanbul: Yay, 1.30 rating, 460 total kills, lost in final but was so much better than everyone its not even funny
LOCK//IN São Paulo: Leo, 1.30 rating, won event, Shao was a demon though
Masters Tokyo: Alfajer, 1.33 rating, only lost 1 map the whole event
Champions LA: Demon1, 1.26 rating, 40% HS, won event
Masters Madrid: Johnqt, 1.12 rating, IGL, won event
Masters Shanghai: Texture, 1.21 KD (no ratings), won event
Champions Seoul: Chichoo, 1.18 rating, won event
Masters Bangkok: Trent: 1.21 rating, lost in final but T1 didn't have someone who had an MVP level performance at the event
Masters Toronto: Forsaken: 1.12 rating, IGL, won the event, though you could make an argument for Alfajer
Esports World Cup: Chronicle: 1.30 rating, lost in Final but he was so much better than everyone else at the event I felt it was fair to give him the MVP
Champions Paris: Brawk: 1.16 rating, won event
If you have any suggestions for this list LMK
Also notably Yay had 3 MVPs, sad to HES NOT ON A TEAM considering he was legitimately the best player in Valorant for the pre-franchising era
Also the weakest MVP is (excluding IGLs) is Brawk in Paris (though that doesn't do him justice)
The strongest MVP is EASILY Tenz in Reykjavík 21' though it was in the Valorant stone age







