Totally humble non biased post I know, but everywhere I look people never seem to give Fnatic any credit or praise compared to other teams, I saw Sideshow and TMV along with other people say their wins are fraudulent and they will go out in 2 despite the fact they cleared Stage 1 pretty easily, came 2nd in Toronto and EWC, did good in Stage 2 (looked a bit off in Playoffs but I think its fairly understandable) and have gone 2-0 in Champs groups. My question is basically what exactly do they need to do to get any actual praise from people? Do they literally need to win champs? This is not a complaint I'm actually curious cause I don't understand it
Fnatic credit
posted in
Valorant Discussion
I agree with that take, their map pool was pretty bad, but is that really the only reason?
team looked shit but alfa looked good. Why would anyone give credit to Fnatic as a team?
that's just not true, you can say that to their most recent game against DRX yes but as a whole for the year, no
all they've shown is they can blow a 2-0 lead. until they win anything, expect the public's opinion on them to stay the same.
and that's enough reason to give other teams way more credit despite them not doing near as much?
Whatever platchat says, the opposite is basically guaranteed to happen, so don't worry about it too much
I'm not really worried I'm quite happy with my own thoughts on it I was genuinely just curious about what other people's reasons actually were
Inferior muricans seeth too hard because fnatic has achieved more than their entire region
if you watched the game vs MIBR then fnatic looked mediocre as a team and were being bailed out by their mechanics, that's why they're not very highly rated going into playoffs. recent performance is mostly what goes into predicting whether a team will win or lose, fnatic bombed out of stage 2 playoffs and didn't look amazing in groups
Let the haters hate. Pacific and NA got more fans. So you see EU teams getting appreciated less
Discord