100T VS ENVY
100T
ENVY
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.46 1.88 1.32 | 241 386 194 | 16 6 10 | / 7 2 5 / | 2 0 2 | +9 +4 +5 | 81% 75% 83% | 135 191 116 | 18% 26% 13% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.27 2.79 0.76 | 177 333 126 | 11 10 1 | / 5 0 5 / | 5 0 5 | +6 +10 -4 | 81% 100% 75% | 101 219 62 | 15% 33% 0% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.25 0.65 1.44 | 229 41 292 | 13 0 13 | / 9 2 7 / | 6 2 4 | +4 -2 +6 | 81% 100% 75% | 140 35 175 | 16% 33% 15% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.17 0.51 1.39 | 316 83 394 | 17 3 14 | / 12 4 8 / | 3 3 0 | +5 -1 +6 | 69% 50% 75% | 179 51 222 | 18% 0% 20% | 6 2 4 | 3 2 1 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.04 0.64 1.17 | 188 73 227 | 11 1 10 | / 11 2 9 / | 6 1 5 | 0 -1 +1 | 94% 100% 92% | 112 64 128 | 26% 67% 21% | 4 0 4 | 0 0 0 | +4 0 +4 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.06 1.25 0.48 | 276 320 145 | 14 12 2 | / 15 11 4 / | 7 4 3 | -1 +1 -2 | 69% 75% 50% | 190 229 75 | 44% 41% 67% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.72 0.92 0.13 | 139 174 35 | 7 7 0 | / 13 10 3 / | 3 1 2 | -6 -3 -3 | 56% 58% 50% | 89 116 7 | 37% 39% 0% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.66 0.74 0.43 | 153 146 175 | 8 5 3 | / 14 10 4 / | 5 5 0 | -6 -5 -1 | 75% 75% 75% | 84 89 66 | 25% 17% 75% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.64 0.66 0.59 | 194 159 302 | 10 6 4 | / 13 9 4 / | 1 1 0 | -3 -3 0 | 63% 58% 75% | 108 104 118 | 21% 25% 17% | 2 0 2 | 4 4 0 | -2 -4 +2 | |
|
0.39 0.37 0.46 | 125 115 156 | 5 4 1 | / 14 10 4 / | 4 2 2 | -9 -6 -3 | 44% 42% 50% | 84 79 102 | 16% 23% 8% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.15 1.60 1.43 | 364 264 424 | 74 24 50 | / 45 21 24 / | 17 8 9 | +29 +3 +26 | 83% 82% 84% | 204 167 225 | 25% 24% 25% | 17 7 10 | 7 5 2 | +10 +2 +8 | |
|
1.16 1.24 1.21 | 222 248 201 | 50 20 30 | / 33 16 17 / | 8 5 3 | +17 +4 +13 | 73% 68% 76% | 129 143 120 | 21% 20% 23% | 4 1 3 | 2 1 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.42 0.76 1.01 | 152 216 108 | 34 25 9 | / 29 12 17 / | 23 5 18 | +5 +13 -8 | 76% 77% 76% | 86 140 54 | 22% 32% 8% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.67 1.18 0.99 | 201 139 232 | 44 13 31 | / 39 18 21 / | 14 5 9 | +5 -5 +10 | 75% 73% 76% | 126 95 145 | 24% 28% 23% | 3 1 2 | 5 1 4 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.38 1.18 0.88 | 175 98 219 | 34 6 28 | / 40 17 23 / | 20 6 14 | -6 -11 +5 | 81% 73% 86% | 118 90 135 | 20% 30% 16% | 11 1 10 | 8 5 3 | +3 -4 +7 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.85 1.13 0.95 | 219 211 235 | 41 25 16 | / 50 33 17 / | 21 13 8 | -9 -8 -1 | 64% 65% 64% | 145 142 152 | 31% 36% 24% | 5 3 2 | 10 8 2 | -5 -5 0 | |
|
0.93 0.93 0.93 | 191 150 261 | 37 19 18 | / 46 27 19 / | 18 10 8 | -9 -8 -1 | 71% 62% 86% | 129 102 175 | 23% 20% 28% | 4 0 4 | 4 2 2 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.81 1.14 0.93 | 221 185 327 | 45 25 20 | / 47 29 18 / | 7 2 5 | -2 -4 +2 | 64% 51% 86% | 136 122 159 | 25% 30% 21% | 7 3 4 | 9 8 1 | -2 -5 +3 | |
|
0.80 0.93 0.85 | 173 173 172 | 33 19 14 | / 46 31 15 / | 9 6 3 | -13 -12 -1 | 61% 59% 64% | 117 123 106 | 31% 31% 32% | 6 5 1 | 5 3 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.62 0.89 0.72 | 161 136 212 | 30 14 16 | / 48 30 18 / | 20 12 8 | -18 -16 -2 | 61% 57% 68% | 109 93 136 | 26% 16% 37% | 1 0 1 | 8 5 3 | -7 -5 -2 |
100T
ENVY
100T
ENVY
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 0.98 1.60 | 360 302 418 | 32 12 20 | / 21 13 8 / | 9 3 6 | +11 -1 +12 | 85% 85% 85% | 212 194 229 | 22% 21% 22% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.07 0.89 1.25 | 196 208 185 | 18 9 9 | / 16 11 5 / | 4 4 0 | +2 -2 +4 | 69% 62% 77% | 133 142 124 | 23% 16% 33% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.89 0.61 1.18 | 177 159 196 | 17 8 9 | / 18 12 6 / | 5 2 3 | -1 -4 +3 | 69% 62% 77% | 120 107 133 | 28% 19% 40% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.80 0.31 1.28 | 162 118 208 | 15 5 10 | / 19 12 7 / | 2 1 1 | -4 -7 +3 | 73% 62% 85% | 117 108 125 | 24% 30% 17% | 6 1 5 | 4 4 0 | +2 -3 +5 | |
|
0.69 0.81 0.57 | 127 189 67 | 12 9 3 | / 18 11 7 / | 8 2 6 | -6 -2 -4 | 65% 62% 69% | 83 124 42 | 34% 35% 33% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 1.38 1.57 | 325 260 391 | 27 14 13 | / 19 10 9 / | 6 1 5 | +8 +4 +4 | 77% 62% 92% | 177 160 194 | 23% 33% 17% | 5 3 2 | 0 0 0 | +5 +3 +2 | |
|
1.18 0.70 1.66 | 232 164 300 | 20 7 13 | / 19 11 8 / | 8 4 4 | +1 -4 +5 | 69% 62% 77% | 151 108 195 | 25% 39% 20% | 3 1 2 | 6 6 0 | -3 -5 +2 | |
|
0.93 0.53 1.33 | 164 107 222 | 15 4 11 | / 18 11 7 / | 3 2 1 | -3 -7 +4 | 62% 54% 69% | 114 77 152 | 27% 13% 33% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.89 0.69 1.08 | 185 84 287 | 15 4 11 | / 19 9 10 / | 9 3 6 | -4 -5 +1 | 73% 54% 92% | 135 62 209 | 22% 13% 27% | 4 0 4 | 1 0 1 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.80 0.52 1.09 | 174 106 243 | 15 4 11 | / 19 10 9 / | 8 3 5 | -4 -6 +2 | 65% 54% 77% | 118 74 162 | 35% 14% 48% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 |
100T
ENVY
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.88 2.08 1.79 | 416 310 461 | 25 9 16 | / 12 4 8 / | 5 2 3 | +13 +5 +8 | 94% 100% 92% | 214 189 225 | 38% 43% 37% | 7 3 4 | 0 0 0 | +7 +3 +4 | |
|
1.25 1.90 0.98 | 152 194 135 | 11 6 5 | / 6 1 5 / | 10 3 7 | +5 +5 0 | 88% 100% 83% | 76 119 58 | 18% 25% 10% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.20 1.30 1.16 | 230 240 227 | 16 5 11 | / 10 3 7 / | 2 1 1 | +6 +2 +4 | 71% 80% 67% | 116 108 119 | 25% 18% 29% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.90 0.87 0.92 | 198 166 212 | 14 5 9 | / 12 4 8 / | 3 1 2 | +2 +1 +1 | 76% 80% 75% | 124 112 129 | 28% 50% 21% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.88 0.35 1.09 | 176 66 223 | 8 0 8 | / 10 3 7 / | 12 4 8 | -2 -3 +1 | 82% 80% 83% | 125 61 152 | 11% 14% 11% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.25 1.37 0.95 | 235 224 261 | 14 10 4 | / 13 8 5 / | 4 2 2 | +1 +2 -1 | 65% 58% 80% | 163 158 175 | 24% 27% 19% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.89 0.97 0.72 | 184 189 175 | 10 6 4 | / 15 10 5 / | 8 7 1 | -5 -4 -1 | 71% 75% 60% | 119 128 97 | 22% 13% 50% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.85 0.99 0.52 | 216 244 153 | 11 8 3 | / 15 10 5 / | 3 3 0 | -4 -2 -2 | 65% 67% 60% | 148 181 68 | 34% 34% 33% | 5 4 1 | 1 1 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
0.50 0.59 0.28 | 149 155 136 | 7 6 1 | / 16 11 5 / | 6 5 1 | -9 -5 -4 | 53% 58% 40% | 94 91 102 | 23% 25% 20% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.38 0.34 0.48 | 144 129 182 | 8 5 3 | / 15 10 5 / | 0 0 0 | -7 -5 -2 | 47% 33% 80% | 98 97 101 | 36% 28% 75% | 0 0 0 | 5 4 1 | -5 -4 -1 |
Almost certainly 100T vs NV but I could see IMT upsetting either of those teams and making it to the finals.
2-0 NV... NV perma ban is Icebox and NV are pretty much better than 100T on every other map... except bind which is a coin flip half the time... but 100T ban that map... NV is better than 100T on Haven and Split so Ascent is 100Ts only chance to pull out a upset IMO
100T 12 year old fanboys will dislike my comment and then be disappointed when I end up being right... 100T have had the easiest bracket up until now... they have proven nothing... they were able to save strats for C9 match since they played T2 teams
I guess you're the 12 year old haha, I didn't even get to say why you're wrong yet Mr. "trash analysis". You said 100T ban bind, one of their best maps. NV's split is amazing, maybe not as good as their bind, but still great. 100T banned it against C9B, they will ban it against NV. Also, 100T were literally showing all of their one-way walls and comms so I don't know if they were really saving strats. Plus, to win that impressively and "save strats" is an accomplishment on its own imo. I agree with Haven being NV-favored. I think statistically NV look better just because they win Haven and Bind more than 100T does, but I still believe in my team to win Bind.
I was referring to the previous two teams they played to even make it into the quarters (Andbox and Ex DIG both T2 teams) but go off my dude... glad I didn't tarnish ur Vlr.gg reputation
NV’s last few teams haven’t been the toughest either. It’s not 100T’s fault they played better in the open qualifiers to get a better seed.
Pretty sure any team would want to save strats if they could. Bias 100T fan so I think 100T will inch it out on ENVY, but there's always the chance I'm wrong. Just gotta wait and see what happens.
Envy 12 year old fanboys will dislike my comment and then be disappointed when I end up being right... Envy have had the easiest bracket up until now... they have proven nothing... they were able to save strats for XSET match since they played T2 teams
bro beb0p ur a legend but u are completely incorrect! u say envy had an easy match up? 100T literally only had to play andbox... probably the weakest team in the qualifiers.
Hes trying to make a copy and pasta... on the most useless social media website ever GL
I think 100 thieves will ban split because they are really bad on the map.
Dude are you joking rn coz last time 100t played against NV on bind it was 13-0. Anyways I think 100t will ban split NV will ban Icebox. 2-1 preety close for anyone
100T 2-1 Envy?
Just watch the actual game first before you throwing out your words dude.
Still I appreciate ENVY at least they tried well...
Who say 100T got easy bracket? ENVY also get easy bracket in open qualifier and what about XSET? So..?
You still hanging in there buddy, coz uk u were about to destroy someone's reputation but what about urs😂😂
Ahahahhah. Yeah, he totally destroyed his reputation in a very important anonymous internet forum for a pc game.
I love it when idiots go all out on attacking the other team, and then get beaten
100T take it 2-1 vs ENVY, last map goes to OT, Hiko clutch wins it for 100T.
Stylistically, these two teams match up pretty nicely. Ascent and Bind are both strong maps for both teams, I'd say 100T look a little better on Ascent, while NV look a little better on Bind. Both teams have also shown proficiency on Haven, but right now, NV look the best on it, even defeating XSET handily on it. Icebox 100% goes to 100T, NV look awful on it while it's one of 100T's best maps. NV is also easily better on split. Assuming Icebox and Split both get banned, I'd say 100T 2-1, with 100T winning Bind and Ascent and NV winning Haven.
2-0 Envy
FNS > Steel
Crashies > Hiko
Victor > Asuna
Nitr0 > Mummay
Ethan > Kaboose
Should be close
Edit: 2-1 ENVY
theres a reason they arent duelists? aim is good when needed but since they are the igls i think the reads and strats are more important for them.
I think experience wise 100t is the better team, I think mechanically speaking NV have the edge. It all comes down to who shows up and who doesn't.
Prediction
100T bans Split, ENVY bans Icebox
Score ends up 2:1 in 100T's favor
100T wins Ascent
ENVY wins Bind
100T wins Haven
My first time making these types of predictions
after watching both Champions and Masters
so go easy on me haha
Yess NV really strong TEAM...I think NV have a higher chance on Haven on duelist side or attacker side..100t right now have clean record of 0-2 they're killing it right now...but who knows both team have great aim
THE TOP COMMENT ARE FIGHTING HAHAHA....Who will swallow their own word....both teammmm are great plss give us a great game...Cuz Faze and Sen are gonna be on next qualifier
I guess all these teams are pretty much qualified for the masters ...so it doesn't matter much at this point
Seeding can make the difference between making it or not. It matters more than you think. Plus, these teams are itching to compete, they don't just want to play stupid. They may play more experimental, but doesn't that make it even more interesting to watch? Just my take on it.
It was meant as a tournament pov and it matters a lot for teams and viewers coz at the end everyone's main priority is qualifying for masters. But nonetheless a treat for fans as we finally have a exciting game to look forward to
This doesn't qualify you for masters it qualifies you for the challengers that qualifies you to masters.
Also there is a 20k prize pool which isnt half bad
Ohh I thought that they call it regional masters and instead it was regional finals and then top 2 from rRegional finals go to Iceland. I guess I got it correct now
These teams definitely want to win. But seeding is kinda fucked since the top 3 teams in masters didnt qualify for challengers 1. So you are most likely getting a tough draw regardless of where you finish in the top 4.
well if u lose here u gotta play 3 games not 2 and prize money is 20k which isnt much but still twice more than second place
so ye i think its good to win here aye
well this match is just super interesting, 2 of the best teams battling to see who is better
Hope so it is an interesting one coz all of the 100t matches have been pretty much one sided affair. It seems like 100t have something up their sleeve for preety much every situation but that might be just due to easy matches as compared to their opponents
Victor was playing Skye like a Phoenix. Running in with his hawks like they are phoenix flashes.
their attack honestly seemed like a throw, Just pushing with no info and intentionally feeding to nitr0/Asuna
why did asuna and nitro push like a potato when they won so many rounds on CT with asuna on cat and nitro rotating heaven?
like hiko cant do shit alone at A cus hes 31 and hes slow asf today compared to yesterday
okay im like very confused about how envy switched up their agent comps completely but like yk what it works ig
its so cringe nv changing comps so they have excuse of "not trying" when they lose
ggs envy go dominate lower bracket comeback and destroy them in the grand finals
asuna popped. The 100t scorecard on a whole will always be top heavy, but what is interesting is the assists of the players on the bottom of scorecard. This just tells, the group tries to support each other even they the kill getting is not even. I mean contribute one way or other. And hiko supported his team better than crashies, in most aspects.(Just saying (; )
just said the last point because 8 fd as sova is lot hurtful to team, but they managed the maps since most of the time it is the victor show for nv
but the most intresting part is they look like sun and moon. The fragging style is very organised for ethan, but we have the server rocker asuna on other hand.
seems interesting, given the huge fuss around CS matchfixing currently you'd have to be awfully bold to do anything like this (I'm aware sandbagging and actually matchfixing are different things but to a lot of people throwing a match is still throwing a match)
He's just jealous I guess. He's dumb and doesn't know how to play so just being toxic is his only way of communicating in his miserable life
that's literally what a bait is, when the other people don't realize it's a bait
and idk man how trash can they be you all got pissed anyway