NA ≥ CIS > KR > EU > TR > LATAM > SEA > BR/JP
Based off of best team from each, not the overall depth of the region. Thoughts?
Region Rankings
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Since Europeans like to claim CIS/TR as part of their region based off of current results
I'll edit it out tho
If CIS does well they are not part of EMEA
If CIS does not do well they are part of EMEA
and when smb do good, they are tr. when smb do bad they are eu.
life sucks man
when Gambit playing bad, EU team playing good? CIS team
When SMB playing good, TR team. playing bad ? EU team
boulshit bruv
Wow another region ranking, we only see from 30 to 50 of those every day. Thanks for your opinion!
True, I based it off of best team from the region
If it was depth, CIS/KR would be no where near the top because they both have only like 3 teams
For me its
NA/CIS(Gambit) > KR ≥ EU(since F4Q lost to G2 and VS won Acend with less trouble) > TR > LATAM > SEA > BR/JP
I based this off from Berlin. Plus its for those who gets confused between CIS and TR, its never bad to be considerate.
CIS TR and EU are split up pretty sure cause of language and ping/server boundaries
CIS > EU?? Cis its only GMB the other teams are so bad, u cant say if a team its better the other too.
GMB > EU > SMB >CIS > TK
1 team not define a region
True if it was based on depth of region:
NA > EU > KR/TR/CIS > SEA/BR > LATAM/JP
depth of region? EU has many more teams that could actually compete in an event like this than NA has
When SEN won, NA > everyone, now SEN lost but they still say NA > everyone, but now that Gambit won, CIS > EU. When they came with the "If team from this region wins, that means that the region is better because the other teams from there are around the same level". Separating EU/CIS/TR is just stupid since they all scrim eachother, play with eachother on the same servers and play all the important tournaments against eachother. Just based on the same logic NA ppl used after Masters 2, if Gambit wins, EMEA > NA. This region separation is just their way to cope and an excuse to say NA > EU. Maybe at some point, there's going to be no representative from the EU teams in EMEA and be just CIS or TR. Who's going to watch them? Obviously EU people that will root for them. I doubt that people from Phillipines wouldn't root for X10 or Paper Rex if those teams were their only representatives for SEA region, just like NA would root for Soniqs or any Canadian team if that was their region only representative. I know it might sound shocking but CIS and TR people are using the same ranked leaderboards and servers like EU so if we go to a player level, the bar is the same for all of them. As much as I'd like Envy to win so 100Thieves get that spot for Champions and be "good bros" (not so much though, I just wanted Envy to win and if they lost, 100T to win the finals so Envy qualifies too) I want a victory for Gambit more just so Fnatic goes to Champions and skips LCQ.
VS too strong for KR, i would say KR=JP bcs too many similliarity skill and macro. So my list, EU>NA>CIS/TR/>KR/JP/SEA/LATAM/BR
I'm obviously biased, but I'm pretty confident that when you compare the top 5 teams from each region:
VS, NU, TNL, DWG, F4Q > CR, Zeta, Nth, FL, RC
Nah i dont think so, i know NU so strong with LAKIA but now no one even close to VS. Its like gambit in CIS region literraly no one beat gambit. CR>F4Q please dont disrespect JP region like NA kids
I’m not disrespecting JP, I literally cheered for them to win it all behind KR
I guess I should phrased it this way, when you put the #2 KR team vs #2 JP team, and so on, the KR teams are probably better
VS > CR
NU > Zeta
TNL > Nth
F4Q > FL
DWG > RC
Zeta/CR might be better then DWG or TNL, but when you compare the two regions head to head, KR > JP even by depth
Discord