The ranking here is separated by continent and I think it would not be difficult to create a ranking where all teams participate since they managed to make the continental ranking
The ranking here is separated by continent and I think it would not be difficult to create a ranking where all teams participate since they managed to make the continental ranking
How would you ever be able to estimate how good a tier 2 team is without ever seeing them compete against the tier 2 of other regions?
By default you'd only be able to make a (meaningful) ranking for the teams that have been in international events.
isnt that how csgo ranking works? no one complained till this day.. Literally many teams dont compete or qualify to international events but still in the top 20 lol
How is it not? Im one to defend valorant saying that its very different from csgo but the one thing i dont disagree is how valorant tourneys are almost the same as csgo ones
bro
This.
Only like 20 teams in valorant have played internationally. Having the tier 2 teams included in those international rankings is beyond ridiculous.
tbf its kinda hard to do a global ranking now cause of franchising. They need one or two masters before you can really see that.
you only have 3 Intl tournament with a significant time gap (Masters 1,2 and Champion), give us more itl tournaments like CSGO then we talk (which is impossible since rito is very firm on their own vision)