0

-Boaster

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
Mdkns

I think it’s time. Guy can’t do anything but stare at his minimap. It’s like Fnatic are 4v5

#2
archetype
16
Frags
+

? L

#21
Malki420
3
Frags
+

Boaster is 7th rank player in this masters as per Sideshow top 20 list
No scream or jamppi in top 20 BTW

#3
GENZAMAN1235
0
Frags
+

💀bro wtF are you literally using your mind

#4
ait8k
-3
Frags
+

--boaster +Mdkns

#5
KyLZi
4
Frags
+

Nah don't hate on my man Boaster

#16
Cabarelson
-1
Frags
+

boaster is the best

#6
Mdkns
-2
Frags
+

The fact that this is controversial shows how stupid the Val community is

#7
Mdkns
0
Frags
+

Bonker and boaster are like twins. Bonker could do what boaster does if he had a good enough team. Mechanics are like the exact same between the two.

#8
idkbro
4
Frags
+

mechanically they are as dogshit but boaster can actually use his mouse (not very well but at least he can to do well enough in tier1)

#19
tezz1
1
Frags
+

100 acs is well?

#9
no_noise_979
0
Frags
+

Boaster should move to coach or analyst role. Too much dancing and looking like a clown in front of the camera instead of taking the game seriously

#10
idkbro
3
Frags
+

his teams always have dogshit playstyle
literally find 30 gimmicks dont care about fundamentals and adapting DERKE GO KILL
SO GOOD IGL, according to him they were trying to improve fundamentally prior to champions but its the same shit, once their gimmicks/setplays get figured out they are tier5 team, good calling from boaster against kru, keep playing retake and flanking every round like the last 6 maps of groups while you are getting exploited by kru for it!! top igl for sure, he should try coaching/analyst and get a real igl

#11
burritx
0
Frags
+

0/8

#12
no_noise_979
2
Frags
+

Too many ppl praise boaster for "crazy complicated strats". They are good for a single game but realistically they are unsustainable throughout a prolonged period of time in a tournament and simple fundamental adaptive IGLing is way more effective and sustainable. Example: redgar, nukkye

It's why we see Fnatic after prolonged periods of time in a tournament, they cant sustain those crazy complicated strats and then they crumble. Its better instead to focus on fundamentals (especially with meta changing constantly). It also doesnt help when they are playing with substitutes, its better for simple IGLing when playing with subs. And vs fast aggressive teams that dont give u time or space again simple fundamental adaptive playstyle is better.

#14
idkbro
0
Frags
+

everyone who doesnt agree with what you just said is probably just shit at the game/has no understanding of how tactical fps work

#15
no_noise_979
0
Frags
+

common idkbro W

#13
LouBag
0
Frags
+

Big Balls Boaster shits on you and your opinions.

#17
Marshal_D_Teach
0
Frags
+

Plastic 2 take

#18
Tokyo777
4
Frags
+

-mdkns from this site would be better

#20
gkd00m
4
Frags
+

Some people here might be right, some might be wrong. What's crazy to me is judging an IGL without two of his best teammates/assets. A lot of takes show you haven't played on a team and don't understand the importance of chemistry.

#22
EpicWolf
1
Frags
+

L post

#23
alecpog
0
Frags
+

ok but the thing is boaster and fnc really do rely on set strats to be great, they probably havent had enough time with fea and h1ber to get used to the new style of entries and util.

#24
VirajKnight
-1
Frags
+

As u can see without Derke team is shit. Even with Derke they don't have Braveaf so a normal team.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment