2026 region placements

Frags

–

Top 1-4 - AMER 5 : PAC 4 : EMEA 2 : CN 1
Top 5-8 - AMER 3 : PAC 0 : EMEA 7 : CN 2
Top 9-16 - AMER 2 : PAC 6 : EMEA 2 : CN 7

Santiago 2026:
PAC (4.16th) > AMER (4.83th) > EMEA (7.5th) > CN (9.5th)
London 2026:
EMEA (5.66th) > AMER (6th) > CN (6.66th) > PAC (7.66th)
Paris 2026
AMER (5th) > EMEA (fairly: 5.875th) > PAC (11.625th) > CN (fairly: 12.5th)

2026 region ranking: AMER > EMEA > PAC > CN

previous years:
2021: EMEA > AMER > PAC
2022: AMER >= EMEA > PAC
2023: AMER > EMEA > PAC > CN
2024: AMER > EMEA > PAC > CN
2025: EMEA > PAC > AMER > CN

ScoutViolet

-2

Frags

–

just ignore ewc twin

PAC > AMER > EMEA > CN

sentinelmain377

Frags

–

why ignore EWC

we all know assific is a worse region. We all watched GE PRX and RRQ bottom feed at EWC and GE FS bottom feed at London. We can't be calling Pacific better than EMEA.

Pacific only has better top teams, but is worse overall. Don't even need to tell you about the 4 bum teams like: DFM VARREL ZETA TS (EMEA only has 2 bum teams: GX PCF)